Search results for query: *

Best chance of that is with a time machine to 2010.

Post #1310.

Not much, justamug. He's probably sitting back, enjoying a slice of pizza or something as we speak.

Goodes and Pendlebury at 21's!! I'm backing the truck up now. EDIT: Alright, everyone else can play now...

Nice one, James :thumbsu:!

Ahh, relief! I rated McVeigh's game tonight too, though he might not have done enough to be amongst the votes. EDIT: Sorry if anyone else thought I was trolling there. Although participation may have died down a bit this year if you compare to last year, I'm still keen to give back to the...

Very much so, mate. May I ask, from a non-biased, non-drunk perspective, is that the best game Juddy has played in a Blue jumper? Because I've made the call, and I'd like to think it's not a result of the state I'm in atm... 25+ contested possies is absolute class!

I'm not a troll mate, I'm just a rather inebriated poster. I'm happy to be told I'm wrong on this one :thumbsu:

3. Judd, nuff said. I hope danielnadjek comes in and gives him 3 votes for his game tonight. 2. Goodes, was always amongst it tonight, and the umps love him too. 1. Betts, I was wrong about him.

Good set of votes there ajs! I'm almost completely with you: 3. Chapman - another BOG for me, could be posing some real value now (on 7-8 with me). 2. Taylor - may be a key defender, but polled three against Port last year in a similarly huge game. 1. Mitchell - class as always...

My god that was frustrating. My votes were a little different to yours, ajs, but I guess it was hard to find a standout amongst the carnage! I had: 3. Johncock - I thought that his run was outstanding. The 'Don't argue' he gave to Judd really stuck in my mind. Representing some huge value as...

Burgoyne's an interesting one atm. I think I have him on 2, but could easily be 4-5. Centrebet haven't allowed multi's on team leaders since the Vince/Hayes/Lecras fiasco of '09. Good times, those :thumbsu:

Not bad mate, it'll be interesting to see how Yarran polls if he keeps up this current form, as he could get amongst the votes in the very near future. Same applies for Garlett...

Your votes, mate? Mine: 3. Shaw - clear best on for mine, plenty of kicks, and lot of marks from opposition kicks, really caught the eye from row BB in the 'G. 2. Judd - ran the lines well all night, quite similar to his game last year R6, a lot of contested footy too. Can't be blamed for...

Yeah, sorry mate. These early mornings will be the death of me :thumbsu:. Hopefully Juddy earns his three next week!

Mate, this was done to death last year. It's a well known fact that Judd polls in games where someone like Swan wouldn't. But hey, there are games Adam Goodes polls in where Brendan Goddard wouldn't, so I reckon it might be time for the Collingwood glasses to come off. Not a direct stab, it's...

Decent point. But you have to think also, Judd and Ablett have been capable of winning on shortened seasons, but that in large is because in their year, they haven't had someone of their particular Brownlow calibre complete a full season against them (Ablett was in a league of his own in '09...

Exactly. It's as much of a lottery as injuries basically. Except there are those select few that you wouldn't bet on, simply because of the fact they are highly likely to be suspended. Quite often, these players and those in the running for the Brownlow don't overlap though. Players I'd be...

Keeping in mind he did miss the first 3 games from suspension last year Cam, so he's not exactly the MRP's golden child like he is with the umps. That said, he got away with one against Pav last year, and he surely would have close to 100 carryover points? We all know the MRP is a bit of a...

What a terrible post. Some of us are going to uni and don't have that much money, and when you post clearly and informatively like that, it seriously makes us consider parting with what little of our hard earned we have. Take a good hard look at yourself :thumbsd:. But seriously, great post...

^^ My thoughts, word for word.

If you wanted to make idiots of Sportingbet, you can still get on him to be Top 3 at $34. But I don't see it as worth it.

I agree that Murphy has had a ripper preseason, and could go nuts (I have a nibble on him), but a little advice, leave your bias at the door :) if you let bias cloud your mind, you'll end up wasting a lot of your money. And no one wants that...

Hear, hear. Very nicely put :thumbsu:

I'd rate Riewoldt and Franklin (barring suspension) as the only chances at the Brownlow as a key forward. But I'd be leaning towards Franklin, been hearing some very good things about him, he just needs to keep his elbows down and his shoulders out of other people's heads... I'm still happy with...

Sorry Doc, but I'd be with Twarby on that one. Roo would be way down the pecking order for mine, and I wouldn't be taking him at 101s, let alone 51s. Key forwards (the last being Lockett, who was something else) just don't win the Charlie, though I'd be happy for him to win it.

Your last sentence pretty much covers it, Kahuna. I'd be considering Buddy ftw, but we all know a suspension is likely at some stage...

Practice votes from tonight's games: Game 1: Adelaide v. Melbourne 3. P Dangerfield 2. B Green 1. A Otten Game 2: Port Adelaide v. Melbourne 3. C Sylvia 2. J Trengove (Melb.) 1. M Thomas Game 3: Port Adelaide v. Adelaide 3. S Thompson 2. B Symes 1. B Reilly

I have been told I would be the world's worst bookie. But in all seriousness, if Krak were to win the Charlie, I'd expect the Pies to be the shortest priced favourites in the GF for quite some time...

Not cool, dude! Smashing, I agree. I'm all over it. At this stage, Jack winning Sydney's votes will have me in profit for the year, if I bet as much as I intend :thumbsu: