Certified Legendary Thread 🏆 GF = PIES WIN PREMIERSHIP #16 🏆🥇

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

I love the way he simplifies things to make a point. Like the “out of form” questions. “What is form? Just do something better and you’ll feel better about yourself”.

I second that.

Fly has had a huge impact on how I go about my everyday life.

I’m constantly telling clients and work colleagues that we need to “get better everyday”.

Simple words, but they work.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Are we ever going to see the goal line footage of that Naicos shot in the last quarter?

Honestly if that wasn't over the line prior to being touched it was so close it at the very least needed to be replayed by the broadcaster.

Would or should I say could still have been a goal to rival one of his dads best and yet we don't even get absolute clarification.
 
Are we ever going to see the goal line footage of that Naicos shot in the last quarter?

Honestly if that wasn't over the line prior to being touched it was so close it at the very least needed to be replayed by the broadcaster.

Would or should I say could still have been a goal to rival one of his dads best and yet we don't even get absolute clarification.
yes that's an ongoing frustration
would also like to see the boundary line and mccluggage leading to the final Daniher goal
probably both decisions were correct but confirmation would be appreciated !!
 
Are we ever going to see the goal line footage of that Naicos shot in the last quarter?

Honestly if that wasn't over the line prior to being touched it was so close it at the very least needed to be replayed by the broadcaster.

Would or should I say could still have been a goal to rival one of his dads best and yet we don't even get absolute clarification.
I still cant understand how they didn't call for a review.
 
Are we ever going to see the goal line footage of that Naicos shot in the last quarter?

Honestly if that wasn't over the line prior to being touched it was so close it at the very least needed to be replayed by the broadcaster.

Would or should I say could still have been a goal to rival one of his dads best and yet we don't even get absolute clarification.

It’s almost like that shot on goal didn’t happen. The silence around it is eerie. The GF moved at such a cracking pace that no one seems to have noticed. But it very much deserved a review. Weird.
 
I still cant understand how they didn't call for a review.

Again, I’ve been banging on about these two, especially the Daicos one for months. Not one single goal line replay, doesn’t anyone find the extremely odd ?????

It’s not going to make a diff l get it but gee the crap on about the Neale goal is so bias compared to anything else
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Are we ever going to see the goal line footage of that Naicos shot in the last quarter?

Honestly if that wasn't over the line prior to being touched it was so close it at the very least needed to be replayed by the broadcaster.

Would or should I say could still have been a goal to rival one of his dads best and yet we don't even get absolute clarification.
That needed to go to review at the minimum, and I believe it was a goal that wasn’t reviewed so channel 7 won’t show a replay/different angle.
Good thing it makes no difference and we are the premiers!
 
would also like to see the boundary line and mccluggage leading to the final Daniher goal
Looked at it frame by frame after the game as I thought it was out of bounds live and the ump behind him was peering side to side trying to get an unobstructed view. Not a Jeremy Cameron level howler, but one that could have been debated for years had we not won.


6206C45E-445B-458C-B7F3-4BEBE775BCA9.jpeg
 
Looked at it frame by frame after the game as I thought it was out of bounds live and the ump behind him was peering side to side trying to get an unobstructed view. Not a Jeremy Cameron level howler, but one that could have been debated for years had we not won.
It’s very difficult to see how that could possibly not be out of play.
Both feet out, ball at least in line with one of his feet.
Oh well, TF we won 😂
 
Looked at it frame by frame after the game as I thought it was out of bounds live and the ump behind him was peering side to side trying to get an unobstructed view. Not a Jeremy Cameron level howler, but one that could have been debated for years had we not won.


View attachment 1886284
good pic thanks

maybe it's one where 99% of the ball is out and 1% is touching the line

I've wondered for some time if there actually is a directive to boundary umpires that when in doubt pay it as in
 
I've wondered for some time if there actually is a directive to boundary umpires that when in doubt pay it as in
Possibly. The problem with the McCluggage was the boundary ump being caught out of position, he was behind with players in between, so would have bloody difficult to spot the footy going over the line for a few seconds. Reckon in time we’ll see the review system extended, not sure what that would look like, but I wouldn’t mind a captains review (1-2 per game only).
 
Possibly. The problem with the McCluggage was the boundary ump being caught out of position, he was behind with players in between, so would have bloody difficult to spot the footy going over the line for a few seconds. Reckon in time we’ll see the review system extended, not sure what that would look like, but I wouldn’t mind a captains review (1-2 per game only).
Just put padding on the fence and have no boundary line. 😂
 
Are we ever going to see the goal line footage of that Naicos shot in the last quarter?

Honestly if that wasn't over the line prior to being touched it was so close it at the very least needed to be replayed by the broadcaster.

Would or should I say could still have been a goal to rival one of his dads best and yet we don't even get absolute clarification.
Strange how they review some and not others.

I was also amazed that Sidey's goal line mark in the PF was not reviewed. Was close but looked OK.

Having said that, at least the umpires had the guts to make the calls, nothing worse than calling a review when it's obvious.
 
Strange how they review some and not others.

I was also amazed that Sidey's goal line mark in the PF was not reviewed. Was close but looked OK.

Having said that, at least the umpires had the guts to make the calls, nothing worse than calling a review when it's obvious.
Or calling for it and ****ing it up roylaly so a team misses the 8..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread 🏆 GF = PIES WIN PREMIERSHIP #16 🏆🥇

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top