HF - Higgins (27) jones (24) grant (25)
FF - Mayes (20) Cordy (24) dal (22)
So half our forward line will be duds in 2015?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HF - Higgins (27) jones (24) grant (25)
FF - Mayes (20) Cordy (24) dal (22)
It's ridiculous to label Jones and Cordy duds so early in their careers.So half our forward line will be duds in 2015?
84% chance - not 83%, not 85%, definitely 84%. I like a man with conviction.
What about the chances of Melbourne beating Adelaide at the MCG this weekend?
I can't see Melbourne winning.Last time I tipped Melbourne against a team that wasn't an expansion side they won. I'll do it again, for the sake of the draft picks!
I can't see Melbourne winning.
Adelaide have far too much to play for & they will be fired up after last weeks poor effort. Hope I'm wrong but I expect this will be a percentage boost for Adelaide.
I would definitely take Toumpas if he is available as I think he is as good as anyone in the draft and is just the sort of player that we need.Sadly I think you are 100% correct PW. Would be bloody nice to have picks 3 and 4 wouldn't it. What would you do if it were your call and you had picks 3 and 4?
I saw this too, but feel it relates more to your first point. Cordy had the front position and Malceski blatantly pushed him in the back because there was nothing else he could do. Cordy does need to start reading the play better though. Hopefully this will come with time.During the 1st quarter on Sunday I saw him get pushed under the ball by Malceski (?!?), although he got a free kick and kicked a goal, I was disappointed he was rewarded a free in this instance due to his poor positioning in the contest.
I would definitely take Toumpas if he is available as I think he is as good as anyone in the draft and is just the sort of player that we need.
Our second pick is more difficult. I think we need midfielders more than KPP's & for that reason I would pass on Grundy & Plowman even though I rate them highly & would look at one of Mayes, Wines or even Garlett.
What do you think?
I agree with you in regards to not bidding for Viney, as I don't think he is a genuine top 5 pick in this draft, and we don't want to risk losing a really top class player just to try and force Melbourne's hand.Hard for me to say given I haven't seen any of the kids play, but first question I'd want to ask JMc. and Fantasia is just how highly they rate Martin and have they done their due diligence around his willingness to be drafted by us. It shouldn't come into it, I know, but I'm a bit wary given some of the stuff you hear about Martin only wanting to go to certain clubs. First decision is therefore do we try to trade one of the picks for the first Mini-Draft pick, or do we stick with the main draft?
Toumpas sounds like a fantastic fit and sounds like he'd be the kind of character that BMc wants. Will he still be available? If we don't go with a trade for Martin with pick 3, then I guess we also need to then decide between Toumpas (if available) and Viney - do we bid pick 3 for Viney and take the risk that Melbourne will baulk? I would play it safe and not bluff, so unless the recruiting staff were adamant that Viney was a better selection than the Toumpas or Mayes (or whomever was available at pick 3) I'd not force Melbourne to use their first round pick on Viney (which is also why I can't see GWS or GC bidding picks 1 or 2 on Viney.)
From what I've read on the phantom drafts (very unreliable) and from Shifter and Ablett's AFL reviews on players so far I think the possible players to select appear the same as the ones you listed: Toumpas, Mayes, Wines, maybe Garlett, maybe even Stringer if he looks like he's regained his explosiveness, leap and agility in the testing at the draft camp.
Bloody hard to work it out this year with the Mini-draft and possible father-son bidding. Made even harder if we do end up with picks 3 and 4 instead of 5 and 6 or 6 and 7.
At the end of the day I think we have to go with picking the best available - Stefoid convinced me of that in one of the other threads. The hardest question in the AFL is always who is the kid best available at your pick?
That backline is extremely tall.Possible Round 1, 2013 Team (my opinion, let me know what you think.)
That backline is extremely tall.
Liberatore will have served his time by then, and he's best 22 every day of the week, and Cordy or Jones would surely be given first go over Panos.
Gia? Higgins?
I'd say our first two draftees will be in there as well, whoever they are.
That's just my opinion, of course.
Not a bad effort though - however I do agree with Igloo about a few who should be in it, including possibly one or more 2012 draftees.
If we ened up higher than Melbourne, then if we bid on Viney they only need to use their next pick I believe. GWS or GC are the ones that have to big on Viney to make them use either of their first 2 picks.....
I will comment if and when is proved to be true.....but do you think they would be doing this now? I would be suprised. Willi still has a finals series....Seems to be strange....and it is after all just rumour....