2012 Player X v Player Y

[SwanBet]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Caddy + Clarke + Morris v Pfieffer + Lake + Clarke/Morris

First one. Lake at best will average around 75, i feel Caddy will have a huge season and average around 85-90, Morris and Pfieffer will average around the same, so i would go with the first option.

Dickson vs Hall

 

[entourage]

Re: Player X v Player Y

You're in part going Hargrave over Lake due to age when Hargrave is 6 months older.

Interesting theory.

Holy crap! Someone told me he was only 25 or so

Woulda gone Lake if i knew! Too late now, would take some serious restructuring to get Lake in-not worth it.

 

[Keystone agony]

Re: Player X v Player Y

I'm unsure of the lake vs hargrave, i'm going hargrave purely because of age, bit cheaper and appears to have had a better preseason. I think they are both winners, so i just picked hargrave for that bit of extra coin. Although, despite Lake's low scores he looked in pretty good touch imo.

You must be picking Dustin Fletcher

 

[entourage]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Nah fletch is too young, rather a bit more experience

 

[mike262]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Hmmm stuck on.

Grimes v Waters

Both have injury concerns. but leaning waters because he looks like he could play the loose man in defense role during the preseason

 

[entourage]

Re: Player X v Player Y

waters easy

 

[loeskow]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Definitely Waters

 

[Rudeurrection]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Horsley vs Neale vs Zorko.

To take advantage of a GWS emergency with a ton.

 

[CrozaN]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Horsley vs Neale vs Zorko.

To take advantage of a GWS emergency with a ton.

And what are you going to do if none of those guys get selected till round 10?

 

[Rudeurrection]

Re: Player X v Player Y

And what are you going to do if none of those guys get selected till round 10?

This is why im asking, the people in the know about their own clubs and rookies.

Obviously you are in the same boat as me. No idea when they will return.

 

[Leeroy Brown 15]

Re: Player X v Player Y

McEvoy/Giles
or
Jacobs/Giles

and why?

 

[Mattrox]

Re: Player X v Player Y

McEvoy/Giles
or
Jacobs/Giles

and why?

McEvoy..... Should get the bulk of the ruck work, perhaps more consistent scoring. Not sure if a Ruck in a side that will get killed most weeks will get a score that will complement Giles. Besides Giles is that ruck in a side that will get killed most weeks. Do you want 2 rucks in your side like that?


I suppose the Saint's preseason hasn't exactly filled us with confidence either...

Guthrie V Hargrave V M Clarke

 

[Butler]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Hargrave will score the most out of those three and has better JS but he also costs more. If you have the money then i would go with him.

Mitchell v Murphy?

 

[matty lloyd the champ]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Hargrave will score the most out of those three and has better JS but he also costs more. If you have the money then i would go with him.

Mitchell v Murphy?

Line ball but you would give Murphy the slight edge with his goal kicking abilities.

 

[Little Jerry]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Heppell + Clarke vs Shaw/Birchall + Morris

 

[Ziebellion]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Line ball but you would give Murphy the slight edge with his goal kicking abilities.

But, Mitchell has the possession edge

 

[matty lloyd the champ]

Re: Player X v Player Y

But, Mitchell has the possession edge

Murphy has a higher kick to handpass ratio I think. This is off the top of my head though.

 

[Butler]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Went with Mitchell. He loves to get involved with the chipping around so plenty of +6's. Not much in it though.

 

[nameless]

Re: Player X v Player Y

OK so right now Duffield and Waters are my 3rd and 4th backs with Hargrave, Ellis and Bugg rounding it out.

My mids are Pendle, Ablett, Boyd and Watson - rest are rookies.

Is it worth downgrading duffman to Lake or Golby etc and bringing in Swan for Watson?
Or is that just overkill in mids and too weak in backs?

I'm just scared of missing out on Swan is he goes BANG! while i really don't want to give up any of the other mids.

Cheers.

 

[Keystone agony]

Re: Player X v Player Y

OK so right now Duffield and Waters are my 3rd and 4th backs with Hargrave, Ellis and Bugg rounding it out.

My mids are Pendle, Ablett, Boyd and Watson - rest are rookies.

Is it worth downgrading duffman to Lake or Golby etc and bringing in Swan for Watson?
Or is that just overkill in mids and too weak in backs?

I'm just scared of missing out on Swan is he goes BANG! while i really don't want to give up any of the other mids.

Cheers.

Now that you know Bugg is going to avg 103 i think you can weaken your backline with that known and strengthen the mids and get Swanny in.

 

[nameless]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Now that you know Bugg is going to avg 103 i think you can weaken your backline with that known and strengthen the mids and get Swanny in.

Haha, while he's shown a bit in 1 game i'm not relying on him for scores like that again.

I do take your point though, maybe I will do it, durability of swan another positive.

 

[lmaohelp]

Re: Player X v Player Y

lol goddard or scotland argh!!>?

 

[flackjack]

Re: Player X v Player Y

Hargrave will score the most out of those three and has better JS but he also costs more. If you have the money then i would go with him.

Mitchell v Murphy?

Both are pretty even. Guaranteed guns. I'd lean towards Murphy slightly due to Mitchell missing more games over the years.

 

[FromDaics2Dids]

Re: Player X v Player Y

SJ & Porps

Or

Gray & Dangerfield

 

[skirk34]

Re: Player X v Player Y

SJ & Porps

Or

Gray & Dangerfield

I would go Gray/Danger from those - I reckon that combo will average 10ppg more than SJ/Porps

Who should I go out of Danger/Gray/Robinson
I was leaning towards Gray as a bit of a unique pick - Danger looks like he may score similarily but is a lower price but he has burnt for a couple of years so am quite reluctant. I can also afford Robinson but will he score higher than these other two for that extra price?