Position 2013 SC midfielders

[Double the Fist]

Surely ---- hmmm surely I WILL be 100% strating with him and as captain!

I;ll be mixing that with Swan too.

 

[toxic]

I;ll be mixing that with Swan too.

And a great mix it is too!!!!!

 

[crystalbreathX]

i have got a huge list on the midfield
cotchin
ablett
luke ball look my three locks at the moments.

 

[toxic]

i have got a huge list on the midfield
cotchin
ablett
luke ball look my three locks at the moments.

why are you set on Luke Ball? he might average 80-90 at best, surely you can find a rookie that will average this and cost you 200K less?

 

[crystalbreathX]

ball or hrovat at the moment mate.

 

[TheOz]

I'm not sure if Ball will average any higher than the low 90s considering Beams essentially took over Ball's spot in the midfield last season. That is not to say that Ball wont contribute, however his impact could be more diminished this season.

 

[1989]

why are you set on Luke Ball? he might average 80-90 at best, surely you can find a rookie that will average this and cost you 200K less?

Agreed. Although Ball's not a bad pick, a rookie and a premium will generally be a better option than two mid-pricers.

 

[crystalbreathX]

im starting to think hrovat and a premium.

 

[Kangaman 94]

Made 3 sides the only differences in the midfield, would like to know what people are thinking with the set up
Team 1 had 3 premiums 2 undervalued premiums 2 mid rangers and 3 rookies
Team 2 had 4 premiums 1 undervalued premium 1 mid ranger 4 rookies
Team 3 had 5 premiums 5 rookies
Would like to know how I should set it up??

 

[crystalbreathX]

i would go with team 2 or 3.

 

[Kangaman 94]

i would go with team 2 or 3.

what would your thoughts be on mundy & ball vs selwood (around that price) + rookie

 

[crystalbreathX]

mundy and ball i think mate like ball he is a lock for me and mundy could break out even more.
where selwood is a gun but a rookie is too risky.

 

[toxic]

Made 3 sides the only differences in the midfield, would like to know what people are thinking with the set up
Team 1 had 3 premiums 2 undervalued premiums 2 mid rangers and 3 rookies
Team 2 had 4 premiums 1 undervalued premium 1 mid ranger 4 rookies
Team 3 had 5 premiums 5 rookies
Would like to know how I should set it up??

Team 3 or a version with 6 premiums.....just for a real pod, just gotta find value elsewhere

 

[toxic]

what would your thoughts be on mundy & ball vs selwood (around that price) + rookie

Mundy is awesome value, selwood is a gun... juggle other areas so u can have them both, barring .injury its a fair chance you'll keep both for a longgggg time

 

[1989]

what would your thoughts be on mundy & ball vs selwood (around that price) + rookie

I'd go for Selwood and a rookie out of those options. Selwood is a top eight midfielder and a decent rookie will generate a heap of cash. Mundy and Ball might just end up clogging up your midfield, unless you think they'll both score well enough to be in your team come season's end.

 

[Kangaman 94]

Mundy is awesome value, selwood is a gun... juggle other areas so u can have them both, barring .injury its a fair chance you'll keep both for a longgggg time

Is there enough depth in rookies in the backs or forwards I wonder though, would have to monitor nab cup but to go with this model would require 9 rookies fro backs and forwards

 

[crystalbreathX]

Is there enough depth in rookies in the backs or forwards I wonder though, would have to monitor nab cup but to go with this model would require 9 rookies fro backs and forwards

5 rookies is too much because 1 or 2 always score crap a.k.a chad wingard.

 

[Kangaman 94]

5 rookies is too much because 1 or 2 always score crap a.k.a chad wingard.

Im going to lock in 4 in Mitchell, Viney, Crouch and O'Meara, i was saying with the management to have 5 premiums and Mundy would require about 5 rookies in the backline and 4 in the forwards as well but I dont think there is enough depth in the backline and forward line rookies to do this

 

[toxic]

5 rookies is too much because 1 or 2 always score crap a.k.a chad wingard.

5 rookies where ? In one area?
And rookies only score "crap" if u choose the wrong rookies: ie Chad Wingard v Toby Greene v James Magner v Sam Gibson. And trust me i have chosen some pretty crap rookies (thats what trades are for to correct the fire truck ups we make)

 

[crystalbreathX]

midfield at the moment
ablett,cotchin,murphy,scully,mitchell,viney,hrovat,o'mearea or osbourne or toumpas

 

[crystalbreathX]

why are you set on Luke Ball? he might average 80-90 at best, surely you can find a rookie that will average this and cost you 200K less?

it is not easy to find a rookie that will average 90 plus.

 

[crystalbreathX]

i am also starting to like the like of lachlan hunter averaged 137 in supercoach during the carnival.

 

[toxic]

it is not easy to find a rookie that will average 90 plus.

Luke Ball wont average 90 IMHO, 90 is not a keep value - so if a rookie averages 80 and rises 250K in the process and Luke averages 90 and rises 100K in the process and Luke cost you an extra 200 in the first place i think the rookie is a far better option

 

[crystalbreathX]

maybe but i like hrovat and hunter from the dogs so he might get pushed out.

 

[Super Hans]

Don't touch Hunter, will play VFL for atleast the start of the year. Hrovat is a good bet though, should play from round one onwards.