Mega Thread 2013: Trade Hypotheticals

[Bert Man]

Brennan is a weird one. His best is great and his bad is really bad.

Rischa is just a shadow of his Brissy days. No idea what's going on with him.

Rischa only really had one good year which was what GC recruited him on.

 

[Bert Man]

Brennan is a weird one. His best is great and his bad is really bad.

Rischa is just a shadow of his Brissy days. No idea what's going on with him.

Rischa only really had one good year which was what GC recruited him on.

 

[pinot]

I have no idea to be honest - I'm guessing if it were to happen it would be for something like a third round pick?



I disagree with this.

If you read between the lines and have listened to what Swann has said over the past few weeks - we are looking to make some major changes to personnel and a large number of players will be turned over; I'm thinking somewhere around 8 players?

I doubt we'd be able to bring in another 8 quality listed/senior players ... we'll look to the draft as well and need to maximise our position within the first 2 rounds (and early third round).

No point Carlton overhauling the list and accumulate a bunch of 18 y.o. Free Agency and players on final year of contract will be targeted first imo.

 

[Two Planks]

Lenny Hayes, Simon Black, Daniel Kerr, Darren Glass, Adam Selwood, Dean Cox, Kane Cornes are all on the wanted list for GWS like they did with Cornes, Power, McDonald etc in first year.

If they could add Franklin and a couple of the above without giving up anything they would be in a good position to attract the premium talent with pick 1 as prospective recruits would feel they could improve rapidly.

 

[Carbine Chaos]

Matthew Watson to St. Kilda?

Nah just a suggestion ....

Don't think you understand the premise of the thread.

 

[Tragic sainter]

No point Carlton overhauling the list and accumulate a bunch of 18 y.o. Free Agency and players on final year of contract will be targeted first imo.

Yes there is. Judd era isn't going to win a flag so you need to rebuild what better way than with 18 year olds?

 

[pinot]

Rubbish

McInnes (21)
Tuohy (22)
Jamison (27)
Henderson (23)
Murphy (25)
Gibbs(24)
Kreuzer(24)
Yarran(22)
Graham (18)
Walker (27)
Garlett (23)
Betts (26)
Menzel (18)
Watson (21)


Solid core group of players for at least another five years.

Judd (29)
Carrazzo (29)
Scotland (32)
Simpson (28)
Waite (30)

Other than Scotland and Waite I see the rest playing on for at least another two years.

Yes we need to find at least three quality players two of them being key forwards.

 

[Joshen]

This is a trade rumours thread. Send general trade stuff this way: http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2013-trade-hypotheticals.1008215/.

 

[The_GTrain]

If we trade Luke Parker for Mitch Brown we are being absolutely Milned.

Wasn't that formerly known as being 'Micky O'd' http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2004/s1069962.htm

 

[tigs2010]

well u said key defender you didn't say how good

For real? You guys need a ruckman don't you? We need a small forward. Derickx for Cyril. Who cares if they aren't equal value?

 

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Then it's not going to happen - we are not going to trade a 3rd drop behind Jamo and Henda KPD for nothing. Maximum value or go find someone else.

Aww drats. I suppose we'll just have to hang onto the gun midfielder in the making and you can keep...who was it again?

 

[Sydswans0512]

what about we give west coast out first pick they give you Mitch brown and you give us Parker

Are you serious I think we'd rather take the pick not saying we would.

 

[doona]

what about we give west coast out first pick they give you Mitch brown and you give us Parker

how about gold coast trade o'meara for tayte pears???

really, wtf????

 

[Sydswans0512]

how about gold coast trade o'meara for tayte pears???

really, wtf????

Why don't we toss up Jesse White for Omera

 

[riolimagic]

Are you serious I think we'd rather take the pick not saying we would.

no I wasn't

 

[Sydswans0512]

no I wasn't

Hawthorn do need a Parker type soon with Sewell going backwards at a rate of knots

 

[riolimagic]

Hawthorn do need a Parker type soon with Sewell going backwards at a rate of knots

I know we will have to picks under twenty If buddy leaves would that be sufficient

 

[pinot]

I know we will have to picks under twenty If buddy leaves would that be sufficient

If Buddy accepts $10 mln they will get him through free agency, Hawthorn not able to match it - no need to trade.

 

[Tragic sainter]

If Buddy accepts $10 mln they will get him through free agency, Hawthorn not able to match it - no need to trade.

You really are an idiot aren't you?

 

[pinot]

You really are an idiot aren't you?

Too hard for you to understand?

The player is eligible to field offers from all rival AFL clubs.

If he wishes to change clubs, the player must decide on the best offer of his choice from one rival club.

His club has the right to match the presented offer.

If the club matches the offer, he may choose to remain with his original club, seek a trade or enter the Draft.

If the club does not or can not match the offer, the player can move to the new club of his choice.

His original club will receive a compensation pick for the loss of the player, on an AFL-determined formula to apply where clubs lose more free agents than they gain in any single transfer period.

 

[Tragic sainter]

Too hard for you to understand?

The player is eligible to field offers from all rival AFL clubs.

If he wishes to change clubs, the player must decide on the best offer of his choice from one rival club.

His club has the right to match the presented offer.

If the club matches the offer, he may choose to remain with his original club, seek a trade or enter the Draft.

If the club does not or can not match the offer, the player can move to the new club of his choice.

His original club will receive a compensation pick for the loss of the player, on an AFL-determined formula to apply where clubs lose more free agents than they gain in any single transfer period.

So that would leave hawthorn with two top twenty picks which they could use to get a midfielder to replace Sewell which is what the hawthorn poster who you quoted was suggesting. You are a peanut.

 

[pinot]

So that would leave hawthorn with two top twenty picks which they could use to get a midfielder to replace Sewell which is what the hawthorn poster who you quoted was suggesting. You are a peanut.

What on earth are you talking about? I don't understand gibberish. lol

 

[Tragic sainter]

What on earth are you talking about? I don't understand anything. lol

Edited for accuracy.

 

[riolimagic]

If Buddy accepts $10 mln they will get him through free agency, Hawthorn not able to match it - no need to trade.

yeah we will get pick 20 for him at a minimum

 

[go you pups]

Give us back Tom Lynch and you can have Milera

Hahaha epic fail that 1, spose with Riewoldt being there though it be hard for him getting a kick