Realise I've done the last 3 posts - I promise this will be it for me (besides, need to get to the pub!)
Lots of posts talk about needing to re-engage with the Melbourne members. Keen to understand what this means. I see that James Kliemt says he is "very concerned and confused about the club's ongoing lack of engagement with our Victorian members". What does that actually mean?
I'm a Melbourne based member - although I admit I'm only a recent convert to the game - and I reckon the engagement (things that the club can control) is actually okay. This year I went to the Simon Black retirement lunch, Brownie's post-game function at Etihad, the Historical Society dinner and the family day/clinic. They were all great events and the club seems to really try to keep Voctorian members involved. Issues raised like the number of games in Melbourne are not within the club's control - they are AFL issues. I'm sure the Board would be happy to play all 11 away games in Melbourne. The problem is that the AFL schedules the Lions to play away games against Victorian teams in Launceston, Wellington, Darwin, Geelong, etc. It's a bit harsh to blame the club for being done-over by the League.
Maybe it's just me. I realisse people like me (generally happy and supportive of the club) are a minority in this sort of forum. Happy to hear other views on Victorian engagement.
Lots of posts talk about needing to re-engage with the Melbourne members. Keen to understand what this means. I see that James Kliemt says he is "very concerned and confused about the club's ongoing lack of engagement with our Victorian members". What does that actually mean?
I'm a Melbourne based member - although I admit I'm only a recent convert to the game - and I reckon the engagement (things that the club can control) is actually okay. This year I went to the Simon Black retirement lunch, Brownie's post-game function at Etihad, the Historical Society dinner and the family day/clinic. They were all great events and the club seems to really try to keep Voctorian members involved. Issues raised like the number of games in Melbourne are not within the club's control - they are AFL issues. I'm sure the Board would be happy to play all 11 away games in Melbourne. The problem is that the AFL schedules the Lions to play away games against Victorian teams in Launceston, Wellington, Darwin, Geelong, etc. It's a bit harsh to blame the club for being done-over by the League.
Maybe it's just me. I realisse people like me (generally happy and supportive of the club) are a minority in this sort of forum. Happy to hear other views on Victorian engagement.