Position 2015 SuperCoach midfielders

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Newton- 70
Cripps- 85
Sheed- 70
Jed- 50 (Higher if not sub)
Heeney- ^
Salem- 75
MClarke- 75
Hogan- 65

In the case of Anderson and Heeney both will have reasonable max prices which don't reflect the average as i'm sure both will have games non sub affected which will boost them up
I can't see Hogan averaging more than 50 tops. Just my opinion tho
 
A slight word of caution on CEY. Though he will likely play round 1 he is no lock for the season by any stretch. He has pretty much come from nowhere but I guess that might be down to Walsh seeing more in him than Sanderson. He is in my team but don't expect an 80 plus average and certain JS.
 
A slight word of caution on CEY. Though he will likely play round 1 he is no lock for the season by any stretch. He has pretty much come from nowhere but I guess that might be down to Walsh seeing more in him than Sanderson. He is in my team but don't expect an 80 plus average and certain JS.

Just need him to play until Adelaide's bye. With Crouch being out for 10 weeks, CEY's JS should be fairly solid, until then at least. At his starting price he should be just about ready to moo by the end of Rd10 if he can average 70-75
 
With Fyfe and barlow taking the tag can we see lachie neale being a premo?
 
With Fyfe and barlow taking the tag can we see lachie neale being a premo?
He'll average around 100 imo, good stepping stone to a fallen 110++ averaging premium, not as a keeper
 
anybody else thinking they wont take Ablett even if he lines up rd1?
I'm feeling crazy, need some support here lol
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You don't win because you got the best $/pt ratio. You win because you get the best total pts.

You risks losing 5ppg in the backs by picking, lets say Docherty over "someone else more expensive" to get that 120ppg player in the mids. If you spend too much in the backs you could lose 20ppg. A point spread of 15 ppg potentially. And that is for just 1 player.

You need to switch from "best value" mindset to "best total score" mindset and back. Too much focus on "value" will leave you without the best total scorers overall.

This approach works well for overall.
In a league context though the intention is to obtain the best/highest scoring team per round for finals. This is where the value approach is necessary to maximise initial teams and to generate cash, even if it means dropping ppg in the short term.
 
No Ablett, No Pendles, No worries!

I have Fyfe, Selwood & Sloane while backing Parker & Wines to become ultra premos.

Bit nervous about it tbh, but I just can't imagine anyone, (even GAJ), averaging 130+ over the first 6 rounds with little to no competitive hitouts in the preseason.
 
I have Fyfe, Selwood & Sloane while backing Parker & Wines to become ultra premos.

Bit nervous about it tbh, but I just can't imagine anyone, (even GAJ), averaging 130+ over the first 6 rounds with little to no competitive hitouts in the preseason.

I'm taking a similar approach - Fyfe, Selwood, JPK with Wines & Griffen. Nervous about leaving out both Ablett & Pendles and I actually wouldn't be surprised if Ablett came out and started scoring 130's - he's that good.
 
OK:

Judd: priced at his 2014 average which includes an outlier of 6 as sub/injured against the Bullies

average high 90s in the NAB with 70% game time.

Is he SC relevant again? and does he potentially represent a mid-priced option to be rolled into a premium around round 7?
I personally won't pick him but if he is an m5 or m6 then might be worth it.
 
I'm sure others have asked but can't be arsed searching...

Lachie Neale?

Finished last season strong and a big NAB series. Can he become top 10?
no way he'll be top 10, will average around 100 imo
 
I'm sure others have asked but can't be arsed searching...

Lachie Neale?

Finished last season strong and a big NAB series. Can he become top 10?

No way top 10.

May as well go jack steven in that price range. Will average more imo although probably still not top 10.
 
anybody else thinking they wont take Ablett even if he lines up rd1?
I'm feeling crazy, need some support here lol

yes, but my sphincter is getting tighter and tighter by the day at the thought
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top