Anywhere you know of where I can? I can oy find highlightsIf anyone has forgotten how good billings is,please go watch quarter 4 against the Bulldogs in round 6. It still amazes me how good he was in that final change
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Anywhere you know of where I can? I can oy find highlightsIf anyone has forgotten how good billings is,please go watch quarter 4 against the Bulldogs in round 6. It still amazes me how good he was in that final change
Afl website big guy. Under videos smart reply off the top of my headAnywhere you know of where I can? I can oy find highlights
How's this sound?
6 and our 2nd next year for
GC (3) and their 2nd next year.
They would be hopeful of finals next year after a shocker this year. Could see them rise from a low 30s to a low 20s. Gives us a shot at parish.
On another note: if they lose Dixon, do they still go for parish? They have an abundance of outside skill, maybe they need another tall?
Or am I drunk?
Fyfe? Get Shiel as he becomes the 1st of the 6 year Free Agents in the pool.
But if we couldn't convince him to come this year what hope do we have later on?
E:
Weitering goes number 2, no chance he lasts to 6That is a fantastic suggestion.
I feel that to trade up to pick 3 we may have to give up a little bit more, but in reality I think landing Parish at 3 would make it worth while. We need elite top end talent and if trading away a 2nd rounder next year means we nail our first pick this year than so be it! Assume the 2nd rounder next year is equivalent to Ross/Wright/White. In reality it's a well calculated punt.
I'd do - 6 and 2nd next year (27-28?) for GC 3 and 37 this year. GC would be confident of landing say Weitering or Curnow at 6 if they want a forward to replace Dixon.
Go to draft with
3 - Parish
37
42
69 - Sinclair
Could always look to upgrade 37 and 42 for a pick in the late 20's too.
Just did. Glorious. Just flipping glorious. And the scary thing is that he didn't just kick those three goals to finish with four for the match - he missed two other pretty easy opportunities! AND he was instrumental in about four other scores.If anyone has forgotten how good billings is,please go watch quarter 4 against the Bulldogs in round 6. It still amazes me how good he was in that final change
No chance drug cheatI think the saints should draft Lachlan Keeffe from Collingwood.
I know he is suspended but we can get him for a cheep pick and when his suspension is over we will have a ready made FB or CHB
Weitering goes number 2, no chance he lasts to 6
WeidemanSorry meant Weidering the other 'W' theme who's a forward that would have gone higher (presumably) if not for the reported injuries etc..
I think the saints should draft Lachlan Keeffe from Collingwood.
I know he is suspended but we can get him for a cheep pick and when his suspension is over we will have a ready made FB or CHB
Second rounder at BEST and as I said would probably not slide into our starting 22 so why would we trade away our first pick for a player who would mainly play VFL?Which is essentially rating Ross as a second rounder, therefore the offer of Ross + our second rounder for your first rounder is not as ridiculous as you seem to make it out to be. Using your theory it would be the equivalent of 2 x Second round picks, for your First round selection.
So you're not happy with Saad being on our list?No chance drug cheat
That's his value in that trade...[/QUOTE\]
But he wouldn't play ones footy at the tigers so again why would we trade for him?
Really ?So you're not happy with Saad being on our list?
Saad was a bit different keefe was deliberate cheatingSo you're not happy with Saad being on our list?
Weideman
I can understand the comment.Saad was a bit different keefe was deliberate cheating
Don't fall for that line of crap, what drug dealer laces a cheap drug with an expensive muscle builder?I can understand the comment.
The argument would be that Keeffe unknowingly took a banned substance due to a dodgy batch of drugs laced with it. So really, Keeffe is as much a drug 'cheat' as Saad in my opinion, which to clarify it if that doesn't make sense - neither are drug 'cheats'.
A drug cheat would surely be someone who knowingly takes something illegal to improve their performance - both can be argued as being unlucky, although, Keeffe is a fool for doing drugs and I wouldn't be interested in getting him even in 2018.
I don't know the first thing about drugs, costs or otherwise. Assumed that most drugs are laced with something to make it go further hence more profit for the dealer but didn't realise the banned substance they were tested for was expensive.Don't fall for that line of crap, what drug dealer laces a cheap drug with an expensive muscle builder?
Go to your local gym and try and buy some "Bute" and then ask why they would lace a $20 eccy with itI don't know the first thing about drugs, costs or otherwise. Assumed that most drugs are laced with something to make it go further hence more profit for the dealer but didn't realise the banned substance they were tested for was expensive.