List Mgmt. 2015 Trade, Free agency and draft rumours

[Big A]

What's the consensus on Woody peeps? Will we re-rookie, or might there be another plan in store?

 

[moginie]

What's the consensus on Woody peeps? Will we re-rookie, or might there be another plan in store?

I was under the impression that he would definitely be picked up on the Rookie list.

 

[Big A]

I was under the impression that he would definitely be picked up on the Rookie list.

Yeah....i dont know much bout this stuff but theres been talk of Glass, Nash, Shem on the rookie list, not much room there and one would have to be promoted to fit Nash in? Just wondering if he ties up a spot next year whilst rehabilitating

 

[heh]

Yeah....i dont know much bout this stuff but theres been talk of Glass, Nash, Shem on the rookie list, not much room there and one would have to be promoted to fit Nash in? Just wondering if he ties up a spot next year whilst rehabilitating

Glass and shem are international rookies, woody would be normal category.
whoops
Just realised i misread your post.
Back to sleep for me.

 

[moginie]

Yeah....i dont know much bout this stuff but theres been talk of Glass, Nash, Shem on the rookie list, not much room there and one would have to be promoted to fit Nash in? Just wondering if he ties up a spot next year whilst rehabilitating

Nash is only speculation. Woodward replaces Hardisty on the Rookie list.

 

[savagelunchbox]

Yeah....i dont know much bout this stuff but theres been talk of Glass, Nash, Shem on the rookie list, not much room there and one would have to be promoted to fit Nash in? Just wondering if he ties up a spot next year whilst rehabilitating

International/Cat. B Rookies don't count towards the limit a club's allowed.

 

[hfc70]

Nash is only speculation. Woodward replaces Hardisty on the Rookie list.

excuse my ignorance but who is Nash ?

 

[Big A]

excuse my ignorance but who is Nash ?

The second Irish gun we're apparently getting. Just to be sure

 

[streetspirit]

Conor Nash a young Irish Gaelic footballer / Union player. Not eligible til at least next year

 

[Easy Slips Catch]

excuse my ignorance but who is Nash ?

An Irish prospect we are sniffing around - along with a few others.

 

[Big A]

International/Cat. B Rookies don't count towards the limit a club's allowed.

Yeah OK. Was trying to beat around the bush, but I think Woody might be rookie list clogging if there's somebody else out there with more upside. There I've said it, sorry

 

[moginie]

Yeah OK. Was trying to beat around the bush, but I think Woody might be rookie list clogging if there's somebody else out there with more upside. There I've said it, sorry

Given what Woodward has gone through I'd be really surprised if the club discarded him. They didn't do it to Bailey.

 

[threesixpio]

Given what Woodward has gone through I'd be really surprised if the club discarded him. They didn't do it to Bailey.

When did he do his knee again? Any chance of a game late next year?

 

[moginie]

Without going through posts to check, I think it was in June. Depending on the speed of his rehab they might be able to play him late next year. But that is all guesswork on my part.

 

[threesixpio]

Without going through posts to check, I think it was in June. Depending on the speed of his rehab they might be able to play him late next year. But that is all guesswork on my part.

Yeah well clearly they won't rush it. WX took a while. The difference with WX is that he was in our best 22 before his knees went. Woody is speculative

 

[Big A]

Yeah well clearly they won't rush it. WX took a while. The difference with WX is that he was in our best 22 before his knees went. Woody is speculative

Speculative and was going to leave us b4 he did his knee again

 

[savagelunchbox]

Yeah OK. Was trying to beat around the bush, but I think Woody might be rookie list clogging if there's somebody else out there with more upside. There I've said it, sorry

Of the 6 rookies on the list, 2 were Cat. B. Of the 4 who were Cat A. 2 of them played all the season in the development squad, 1 of them played a majority of the season in the development squad, and the last of them was only on the rookie list because he was contracted for 2016 and was never in contention for a game for Hawthorn.

 

[Davo-27]

our rookies 2015 were

Category A
Grimley (delisted)
Hardisty (delisted)
Miller-Lewis - potential
L.Langford - nepotism

Category B
Heatherley (upgraded to list)
Tatupu - potential

2016

Category A
Miller-Lewis
L.Langford
1. ? (Woodward)
2. ?

Category B
Tatupu - Kiwi
Glass - Irish

 

[Big A]

Of the 6 rookies on the list, 2 were Cat. B. Of the 4 who were Cat A. 2 of them played all the season in the development squad, 1 of them played a majority of the season in the development squad, and the last of them was only on the rookie list because he was contracted for 2016 and was never in contention for a game for Hawthorn.

Wow OK. Looks like deadwood then
Edit: worth keeping him then

 

[LegendLewis]

would we pick up Morabito?

 

[kirbatron]

No

 

[Big Hotdog]

would we pick up Morabito?

I cannot think of one reason why would pick up Morabito.

1. Maybe he's a good bloke.......
2. ?

 

[savagelunchbox]

I cannot think of one reason why would pick up Morabito.

1. Maybe he's a good bloke.......
2. ?

Using the Watson logic, he was a top draft pick thus making him a great depth player.

 

[PhatHQ]

Using the Watson logic, he was a top draft pick thus making him a great depth player.

I think your Watson logic is a bit off.... Lol anyway

 

[cryptor]

our rookies 2015 were

Category A
Grimley (delisted)
Hardisty (delisted)
Miller-Lewis - potential
L.Langford - nepotism

Category B
Heatherley (upgraded to list)
Tatupu - potential

2016

Category A
Miller-Lewis
L.Langford
1. ? (Woodward)
2. ?

Category B
Tatupu - Kiwi
Glass - Irish

While it's fair to say L.Langford was picked on the back of his father and brothers name there is form in the family of them being late bloomers who are worth the wait. Rookie list is exactly where you have those speculative picks. If he hasn't shown enough by the time the maximum rookie period transpires then he'll be cut without hesitation. Though "enough" may not be as much as we'd like to think based on how long someone like Grimley was able to stay on the list.