2016 Midfielders

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thinking of playing a Fyfe Pendles Ablett Rocky Libba Mills Rookie rookie midfield.

Feels like the best balance to get overall strength on all lines.

Would love to squeeze danger in but that will come

Will be very common I think. Mines exactly that at the moment. Tried to add another premo but it left the other lines pretty weak.
 
Thinking of playing a Fyfe Pendles Ablett Rocky Libba Mills Rookie rookie midfield.

Feels like the best balance to get overall strength on all lines.

Would love to squeeze danger in but that will come

Will be very common I think. Mines exactly that at the moment. Tried to add another premo but it left the other lines pretty weak.

Also going exactly the same. Don't think you can go wrong with those premos, but agree having Danger would make it :fire::fire::fire:. Been trying to fit him in but compromises the other lines too much. Can't have them all I guess. Hopefully he starts slowly;)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Also going exactly the same. Don't think you can go wrong with those premos, but agree having Danger would make it :fire::fire::fire:. Been trying to fit him in but compromises the other lines too much. Can't have them all I guess. Hopefully he starts slowly;)
Yeap exact same for me except I will be waiting on other rookies before selecting Mills.
 
Also going exactly the same. Don't think you can go wrong with those premos, but agree having Danger would make it :fire::fire::fire:. Been trying to fit him in but compromises the other lines too much. Can't have them all I guess. Hopefully he starts slowly;)
I've got a team with Danger in it as well, but with 2-0-1 in the rucks, it leaves me with 6 cheap rookies on the field between the DEF's & FWD's. If the rookies come in abundance, I might give it a go, but I doubt it will happen.
 
I've got a team with Danger in it as well, but with 2-0-1 in the rucks, it leaves me with 6 cheap rookies on the field between the DEF's & FWD's. If the rookies come in abundance, I might give it a go, but I doubt it will happen.


I've tried this and I'm very happy with the forward rookies although Petracca might've put a dent in that but I have very little confidence in 3 back rookies
 
Thinking of playing a Fyfe Pendles Ablett Rocky Libba Mills Rookie rookie midfield.

Feels like the best balance to get overall strength on all lines.

Would love to squeeze danger in but that will come
Yeah I'm also going to run with Fyfe, Pendles, Ablett, Rocky and Libba.
Mills is still 50/50, I want him, but he's expensive and that hurts. Will all depend on how my Def and Fwd look, and whether we get enough cheap cash cows
 
Thinking of playing a Fyfe Pendles Ablett Rocky Libba Mills Rookie rookie midfield.

Feels like the best balance to get overall strength on all lines.

Would love to squeeze danger in but that will come

I'm keen on Sloane or maybe Jelwood if he lines up in R1 as a POD to Fyfe. I'm scared not starting Fyfe but the $ saved is very tempting.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I have all the above except I also have sidebum (could morph into Shiel, Parker, jelwood ect depending on pre-season form)

No doubt it leaves my fwd a tad thinner, but I'm just not as convinced in premo fwds in that price range. Still a while to go... I just want to see the round 1 teams NOW!!!
 
Dogs fans know anything more about this knock Libba copped. Should we be concerned? Pogba
Bev said he just got a little knock at training so it's not worth risking him. He will 100% play NAB2 unless something happens though.
 
Having GAJ at M4 looks so, wrong...and yet so right! Anyone else considering?
Considering? Ah what? What beer to have with lunch? Or which horse in the next race at rosehill? For me to pick Gaj needs zero consideration what so ever.. Hes in and wearing the C against Lessendon!
 
Considering? Ah what? What beer to have with lunch? Or which horse in the next race at rosehill? For me to pick Gaj needs zero consideration what so ever.. Hes in and wearing the C against Lessendon!

Think he's suggesting having all of Fyfe, danger and Pendles- pushing gaz back to M4.

If you can do that without compromising the rest of your team, good luck to you. I tried it though, and it didn't work for me. The rest of the team looked completely out of whack.

Besides - having a beer with lunch should NEVER be the subject of a decision making process. Just do it! And what do you like in the next? :)
 
Think he's suggesting having all of Fyfe, danger and Pendles- pushing gaz back to M4.

If you can do that without compromising the rest of your team, good luck to you. I tried it though, and it didn't work for me. The rest of the team looked completely out of whack.

Besides - having a beer with lunch should NEVER be the subject of a decision making process. Just do it! And what do you like in the next? :)
Tremizzina, chris wallers.

Absolutely agree, i couldnt decide if I wanted a pint or a schooner tho

Edit: Tremor a sneaky chance also
 
Tremizzina, chris wallers.

Absolutely agree, i couldnt decide if I wanted a pint or a schooner tho

Edit: Tremor a sneaky chance also
:thumbsu:

I usually start with a schooner, work my way up from there.
 
Think he's suggesting having all of Fyfe, danger and Pendles- pushing gaz back to M4.

If you can do that without compromising the rest of your team, good luck to you. I tried it though, and it didn't work for me. The rest of the team looked completely out of whack.

Besides - having a beer with lunch should NEVER be the subject of a decision making process. Just do it! And what do you like in the next? :)

Correct.

Got backline of Shaw, Laird, Houli, Bartel, rookie x 4. Mids as above + Libba, rookie x 6, Rucks Goldy, NicNat plus r, Fwds Dusty, Dahl Barlow, rookie x 5.

So with that lineup, no Rocky, which concerns me, and only 65k left, which doesn't. I most likely won't run with it, but it looks bloody good on 'paper'.
 
Correct.

Got backline of Shaw, Laird, Houli, Bartel, rookie x 4. Mids as above + Libba, rookie x 6, Rucks Goldy, NicNat plus r, Fwds Dusty, Dahl Barlow, rookie x 5.

So with that lineup, no Rocky, which concerns me, and only 65k left, which doesn't. I most likely won't run with it, but it looks bloody good on 'paper'.

Rocky is an interesting one. Everyone will have him, so leaving him out is a big gamble.

probably the first team I've seen without him, but you have to give something to get the big 4. Could pay off for you.

Getting The rookies right is so important this year, maybe more then usual. There's a lot of sameness about teams being posted recently.
 
Rocky is an interesting one. Everyone will have him, so leaving him out is a big gamble.

probably the first team I've seen without him, but you have to give something to get the big 4. Could pay off for you.

Getting The rookies right is so important this year, maybe more then usual. There's a lot of sameness about teams being posted recently.

Don't know why you would pay Pendles price when you can rocky so much cheaper.
 
Don't know why you would pay Pendles price when you can rocky so much cheaper.
upload_2016-2-24_17-12-13.png

6 consecutive years over 110 with 4 120+ while only missing 5 games in that period. Although Rockliff did have that 132 season, he doesn't have the scoring and durability history of Pendles, so would pick him ahead of rockliff for sure if forced to choose. (would rather have both:D:D:D)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top