2016 Non-Crows AFL Discussion - Cont. in Part 2 (link in OP)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Voss thing is interesting. Koch has been going on about all of the money they have spent in the football department, and how they have been given everything they need. But they were given Voss, after people were impressed by his reality tv coaching. Was it just publicity, a gift from Koch, was he a marketing suggestion to get another "win" or did the people in charge of football actually decide he was the best candidate for the job. Seems the supporters aren't too happy with the choice now.
It's like they don't know that TV, even relaity shows, are scripted and subject to heavy editing, and re-shoots days and weeks after other spliced in footage is filmed.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The Voss thing is interesting. Koch has been going on about all of the money they have spent in the football department, and how they have been given everything they need. But they were given Voss, after people were impressed by his reality tv coaching. Was it just publicity, a gift from Koch, was he a marketing suggestion to get another "win" or did the people in charge of football actually decide he was the best candidate for the job. Seems the supporters aren't too happy with the choice now.
Voss never did an aprenticeship before taking on the Lions job.

Confidence is one thing, having relevant experience is an entirely different matter.

Port need experienced strategic assistants to compliment Hinkley.
 
apparently, if Ryder was playing in place of Lobbe, Port would currently be sitting 4-1.

You couldn't make this stuff up.

We should take bets on which 2 10 goal losses he alone would have resurrected.

The way they arent working hard enough i suggest they would still be 2 and 3. They wouldnt have beaten us, GWS or Geelong. Instead of losing by a lot they probably would only lose respectably
 
The way they arent working hard enough i suggest they would still be 2 and 3. They wouldnt have beaten us, GWS or Geelong. Instead of losing by a lot they probably would only lose respectably
Correct. Their problem starts after the ruck contest 99% of the time. Setting up to a losing ruck contest isn't that hard. They could bring Sandilands in and still be where they were at. Fremantle not exactly travelling like winners before Sandi was injured.
 
Well the argument is the name isnt copywrited or trademarked. I think its good to see ideas come from our site for the world to see.
Actually copyright is an inherent right that comes into effect as soon as something is created and exists for 70 years after the life of the Author.

Hence the term "the Dash brothers" would be covered under copyright as long as it could be shown that it wasn't independently created by the SEN journalist (i.e. You need to show it was copied).
 
Actually copyright is an inherent right that comes into effect as soon as something is created and exists for 70 years after the life of the Author.

Hence the term "the Dash brothers" would be covered under copyright as long as it could be shown that it wasn't independently created by the SEN journalist (i.e. You need to show it was copied).

A lot of people don't realise that there are some murky issues around slander and publication for putting things on the internet as well. There have been cases overseas pursuing people over things they have written. Some have been thrown out but there are a couple that have been successfully prosecuted. Now there is a lot about the stalking and revenge stuff and impersonation that the law hasn't caught up to yet.

For the SEN thing, it was more a case of the lack of respect from the journo that I objected through in claiming he had come up with something original. He might have, but it was a little too close to a coincidence considering the thread in here.
 
Actually copyright is an inherent right that comes into effect as soon as something is created and exists for 70 years after the life of the Author.

Hence the term "the Dash brothers" would be covered under copyright as long as it could be shown that it wasn't independently created by the SEN journalist (i.e. You need to show it was copied).

Copyright law is far more complex than that. For example, you can't copyright the title of a film or play. Nor can you copyright the name of a character in a play, film or book. I doubt Dash Brothers could be deemed copyright quite apart from the fact that two people may have independently thought of the term.
Attribution is polite though.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

apparently, if Ryder was playing in place of Lobbe, Port would currently be sitting 4-1.

You couldn't make this stuff up.

We should take bets on which 2 10 goal losses he alone would have resurrected.
Maybe they would be 1:4 as they could have thought "it"was just going to happen with Ryder
 
Voss never did an aprenticeship before taking on the Lions job.

Confidence is one thing, having relevant experience is an entirely different matter.

Port need experienced strategic assistants to compliment Hinkley.

Keep it up Ken. Good job Ken. You're the best Ken.
 
I once had a journo tweet something he 'discovered' that was actually just a screenshot of one of my BF posts (without my name in it of course) :p
Was it Sean Craig Murphy?
 
Which shits me a little. Trigg and Harper, when serving their suspensions, weren't even allowed to go to a game of footy. ANY game. AFL sets rules and changes them to suit.

Hey don't punish us more by allowing that. ;)
 
Wow. Just spoke with a friend who knows a port player very well. There are major issues between coaches and players. Culture is for coaches to simply yell at players and they've stopped listening. The players are also yelling at each other often and Ken is not leading. Voss is hopeless. Koch and management have not been focusing on building a football program as all on revenue.Now they are jumping up and down. Tearing apart from the sound of it!
 
I think the "Toast - Welcome Michael Voss" thread on the Port board is one of the funniest things I've ever read, a slow (well pretty fast actually) spiral from the heights of ecstasy to the depths of despair.

It's on par with Carltons "Welcome Liam Jones" thread.
 
apparently, if Ryder was playing in place of Lobbe, Port would currently be sitting 4-1.

You couldn't make this stuff up.

We should take bets on which 2 10 goal losses he alone would have resurrected.

And that is he will keep his job. The excuse/reason trotted out to the Lemmings will be the loss of Ryder.

You can already see the line trotted out it is all players fault and not Kern's. They can not afford to pay him out so he won't be sacked.
 
Wow. Just spoke with a friend who knows a port player very well. There are major issues between coaches and players. Culture is for coaches to simply yell at players and they've stopped listening. The players are also yelling at each other often and Ken is not leading. Voss is hopeless. Koch and management have not been focusing on building a football program as all on revenue.Now they are jumping up and down. Tearing apart from the sound of it!

But I thought that they could never tear them apart?
 
Seems they will stand behind anything, the buddy free was ridiculous.
Be nice if they actually played some of the ones that were actually an issue other then a 50-50 maybe throw HTB.
http://www.afl.com.au/video/2016-04-26/crows-not-denied

That little turd burglar should immediately resign after saying that load of tripe. A blatant case of lying right there, now we know why teams will never beat Hawthorn.Total and utter BS they are allowed to get away with.:mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top