List Mgmt. 2017 Trade Free Agency and List Management Watch Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Ignore my previous post - Oh, you already have

My understanding is that any extra point (plus or minus) get added to, or subtracted from, the next pick. So if the Dogs bid at 16, we match and have extra points that move pick 20 up to (I guess) about 18. So we actually most likely lose virtually nothing. And we gain a pick in the space where there will be quality players. Anything over 30 this year is dodgy. So we've moved from 2 goodish picks to three goodish picks. Actually sounds OK. Not genius, but fine. And if someone slides we might just get that tall we want.
 
"Trust me, we are still really interested in Schache, we're just waiting to get him at the right price".

--- Dogs trade picks 25 and a packet of crisps to Lions for Schache ---

#nicesauces
#greatcred
#howaboutanotherpodcast

Lol he can’t get everything right, you have made yourself look like the biggest tosser lately.
 
"Trust me, we are still really interested in Schache, we're just waiting to get him at the right price".

--- Dogs trade picks 25 and a packet of crisps to Lions for Schache ---

#nicesauces
#greatcred
#howaboutanotherpodcast

Dude... you’re just a flat out douche. Wtf is your problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Good to have just won the flag & have 3 picks inside 25. Pretty good when you look at it that way. Just a concern though that even if we pick 2 talls realistically they won't be ready for a year or 2 still
 
Schache got extremely emotional in our interview with him when asked about his headspace and interviewed with us really poorly.

Stringer stormed out of his interview with us because we were pretty upfront about his offield issues and asked him upfront if he was willing to change.
Are both of these events confirmed?
 
Dude... you’re just a flat out douche. Wtf is your problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A man that sticks to his bets

giphy.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

we need a jack replacement the reason im pissed is because 15 gave us a chance to nab best available of anyone who slides be it mid/or key position the dogs will bid on naish at 16 they have a massive hard on for him we will match and there goes 17

so we need to find our tall jack protege with 20 or 25 brander is now out of reach

hayes could slide but he is a dinosaur ruck who doesn't suit the modern game
oscar allen is a taller version of lemon
balta looks good but is a defender and try's to do too much with the pill
 
My guess is it was all for insurance.
If the Dogs bid 16 on Naish, then we match it with 17 and take 20 and 25 to the draft.
All a bit underwhelming.
Remember thouugh that we got a premiership and pick 15 (turned into picks 20 and 25) for Deledio, who will barely play another game.
My read as well. We really felt we needed to split one of those 1st picks and Brisbane are desperate to get Connor Ballenden so we extracted something out if it - think we were smart!
 
None of our competition got stronger. #yellowandblacktoback
Adelaide got weaker Cameron will be a big loss for the way they play. Betts is now on his own up there.
GWS has lost even more depth
Cats may have got Ablett but lost Fatlop, Lang, Lonergan and Mackie. Ablett is 34 and barely on the park lately.
Port Stronger move into top4
Essendon stronger move up to 5th
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2017 Trade Free Agency and List Management Watch Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top