Honestly, if Brad can get a million dollars a year somewhere, I wouldn't begrudge him leaving. He's good but he's not that good, and he's only ever an innocuous injury away from missing a season at a time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly, if Brad can get a million dollars a year somewhere, I wouldn't begrudge him leaving. He's good but he's not that good, and he's only ever an innocuous injury away from missing a season at a time.
If Brad gets up Luko and a top 10 pick, I'll do thatHonestly, if Brad can get a million dollars a year somewhere, I wouldn't begrudge him leaving. He's good but he's not that good, and he's only ever an innocuous injury away from missing a season at a time.
Getting tense and interesting now, draft picks being exchanged and flying all over the place from one club to another.
Its at a stage, Im not sure who has what pick in the top 20.
Wouldnt they just use 6 and 59 to make up the points for Green?
Shame the ball will never get to Luko as our midfield will be very thin. Keep Brad.If Brad gets up Luko and a top 10 pick, I'll do that
I'd do it. Fck emLets say for a second Gold Coast bite that cherry and offer Pick 1 or 2
Would we be so cold even if we did the pick swap of 4 > 6 still bid on Green? Then take whoever we want
That would be amazing! GWS would hate us but it would move 6 up to 5
If Brad gets up Luko and a top 10 pick, I'll do that
The only risk is they don't match it and we miss Anderson - Doh!Lets say for a second Gold Coast bite that cherry and offer Pick 1 or 2
Would we be so cold even if we did the pick swap of 4 > 6 still bid on Green? Then take whoever we want
That would be amazing! GWS would hate us but it would move 6 up to 5
Pretty sure Hamish has a hard on for Green and would almost not want GWS to matchThe only risk is they don't match it and we miss Anderson - Doh!
Thats when you do the 'ol... just jokes k?The only risk is they don't match it and we miss Anderson - Doh!
Maybe the Crows can pay some of his salary
#manurelogic
I understand most things in footy, but I'm not great with the pick swap bidding etc.
What's the gist at the moment - GWS need our Pick 4? Fine, make them squirm and see what they dish up.
The only question is, what else are they going to throw in. Okay, we'll swap pick 4 for pick 6, but they have to give us something extra to make it worth our while. Future first round pick? A player? We'll see.
This is the second time our reputation for bidding on academy players has benefited us. We have an extra second round pick this year (pick 23), simply because we agreed last year to downgrade our pick in the 20s by just a few places so GWS could take an academy player before we had a chance to bid on them.
And Green looks to be a good playerI don't understand why any club would not bid on an academy player? If you rate that player at that spot in the draft, why would you not try to take him? Maybe you'll get lucky and the other team won't match the bid. Worst case, they do match it and you don't get him and you move on to your next preference, which is what you'd be doing anyway. But at least by bidding you don't give an opponent a free hit by not even trying to take the player.
Basically, yeah.
GWS have the rights to an academy player, Tom Green. The Crows also want him and will bid on them (we have a reputation for doing that). If we do so, GWS still get him if they want, but they have to give up some picks to do it. Effectively, they would lose pick 6 (plus some later picks).
If they can do a swap with us, so they have pick 4, and we have pick 6, then they get to use pick 4 on someone else before we get a chance to bid. So they would get two top-end players instead of one.
Presumably they spoke to us about trading pick 4 for both picks 12 and 18, but we said no thanks, we want a top ten pick. I'm guessing that's why they did the trade with St Kilda. It wouldn't make sense otherwise because they actually lose points by doing the swap with St Kilda which makes it even harder for them to match our bid.
The only question is, what else are they going to throw in. Okay, we'll swap pick 4 for pick 6, but they have to give us something extra to make it worth our while. Future first round pick? A player? We'll see. Presumably we'll get more than the difference is normally worth because of the situation. To GWS, they are effectively getting an extra top 4 player for "free" if they can pull the trade off, so they are incentivised to give us a high quality return.
This is the second time our reputation for bidding on academy players has benefited us. We have an extra second round pick this year (pick 23), simply because we agreed last year to downgrade our pick in the 20s by just a few places so GWS could take an academy player before we had a chance to bid on them.
I don't understand why any club would not bid on an academy player? If you rate that player at that spot in the draft, why would you not try to take him? Maybe you'll get lucky and the other team won't match the bid. Worst case, they do match it and you don't get him and you move on to your next preference, which is what you'd be doing anyway. But at least by bidding you don't give an opponent a free hit by not even trying to take the player.
Okay, I appreciate the explanation.
I'd do 4 and a 2nd for 6 and their 2020 1st.
I wouldn't. Our 2019 2nd arguably holds more value than their 2020 1st, given that 2020 is reputed to be a weaker draft and one which is massively compromised by F/S and NGA selections (20 of the top-50).Okay, I appreciate the explanation.
I'd do 4 and a 2nd for 6 and their 2020 1st.
I wouldn't. Our 2019 2nd arguably holds more value than their 2020 1st, given that 2020 is reputed to be a weaker draft and one which is massively compromised by F/S and NGA selections (20 of the top-50). Adding the 2019 2nd vs 2020 1st actually makes the deal worse for us.