Maybe not much if St Kilda have to give up their current first pick for Hill. Melbourne have also been talked about as wanting to trade their first.
That why Saint want to split their first in to two later 1st rounders.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe not much if St Kilda have to give up their current first pick for Hill. Melbourne have also been talked about as wanting to trade their first.
Ummm, we had four Rising Star noms last year, and have blokes like LDU and Walker who have elite traits at senior level.
And the ones that do become stars don’t hang around. I’m a true Roos supporter but let’s be honest, it’s been a long time since we’ve had players that other teams want or genuine stars that want to join us.That isn't enough though. We need a larger pool of talented players around the same age, not everyone who get a rising star nomination becomes a star.
They might be throwing names up who are potentially available, but this off-season with the staff turnover we've had and all that, I expect it's Rhyce that is doing the majority of the discussions with players he wants.More referring to Michael McMahon but yes cam also
Both guys won’t be here next year but are in positions we need to talk and identify targets
And the ones that do become stars don’t hang around. I’m a true Roos supporter but let’s be honest, it’s been a long time since we’ve had players that other teams want or genuine stars that want to join us.
With respect, none of those are “big dogs”. Higgins can’t even attract a solid long term offer.I think we have had players other teams want, a lot of teams would want Brown, Higgins, Cunnington, Tarrant, etc. We just have too many guys who plateau at too low a level to be a contender.
On rumoured coin of $1M a year.Banking on Grundy going back to SA the following year when a free agent
Really? In what way?
The fact that he gets to contests, wins plenty of 1 on 1s, is strong over the ball and an elite decision-maker? Probably gets him lots of points, but that's because what he does is quality, so the points counting is essentially irrelevant.
Please tell us you're not going to follow that well worn path of applying the label "Dreamteam / Supercoach mentality" as a means of dismissing others' views.
I agree that Ahern has potential in that role, but Laird is a multiple All-Australian half back. He's on a completely different level to Ahern. It's also yet to be determined if Ahern is consisently defensively competent enough to play in the back half. Ahern may end up more damaging, but Laird is defensively good and excellent, albeit maybe not as skillful as Ahern, going the other way.He's a key player in a leaky defence in a side that's fallen apart over the last two years and just sacked their coach.
He's got neat skills and runs hard. I'm not saying he's a bad player, but when I've watched Adelaide, he doesn't seem hugely damaging.
If we have limited currency in terms of a valuable pick to trade and have to choose between using it on a small forward or Laird, I'm going trhe small forward every time.
As I said, I'm backing Paul Ahern to play a distributing half back role next year.
Ahern can be more damaging by foot out of the backline than Laird.
Banking on Grundy going back to SA the following year when a free agent
Marley Williams would not be happy if Laird lobbed up with us.
They're like for like.
Room for bothMarley Williams would not be happy if Laird lobbed up with us.
They're like for like.
He's a key player in a leaky defence in a side that's fallen apart over the last two years and just sacked their coach.
He's got neat skills and runs hard. I'm not saying he's a bad player, but when I've watched Adelaide, he doesn't seem hugely damaging.
If we have limited currency in terms of a valuable pick to trade and have to choose between using it on a small forward or Laird, I'm going trhe small forward every time.
As I said, I'm backing Paul Ahern to play a distributing half back role next year.
Ahern can be more damaging by foot out of the backline than Laird.
So whats wrong with our center clearance? Too slow/less responsive with both Ziebell and Cunnington in there?
See this makes sense.
I saw a few games where TT was able to extract the ball too easily as, Jy. So I guess where do we keep Cunnington/Ziebell - both in the forward line? Totally agree with you, I'm just lost on where they can likely be moved to. I feel like it's a bit of surplus with the two running around - while Cunnington is definitely the lock in.
And the ones that do become stars don’t hang around. I’m a true Roos supporter but let’s be honest, it’s been a long time since we’ve had players that other teams want or genuine stars that want to join us.
One thing we got terribly wrong this year was 666. There's definitely no room for both of them at centre bounces but Cunners still did his bit though. Cunners real strength is at stoppages. There's more stoppages than centre bounces. Centre clearances are suited to burst players with high twitch muscles. That's why Jy jumped out of the ground, Geelong played Selwood on a wing and blokes like me remain dumbfounded why Atley doesn't start in the middle.
Ziebell's role can look no further than notch hann. He is someone u want one out in the goal square against a small defender or on the Lead against a taller defender. Also ziebell is devastating around 50 arc. He is our cut with market as a power toward once he grows more physically. Brown is the mobile running big forward as u want him to run and jump in that order.
Cannington has more midfield usefulness but only during general play. He us still a monster when there is a congestion but not at center bounce. Our center bounce 3 should be Anderson, Simpkin, ldu, thomas from 2020 onwards as we need to dutch Higgins to accelerate the evolution of the team.
I looked up "dutching" via the urban dictionary, I aint volunteering my services! Probably why Rioli is currently in a pickle