Teams 2020 Rate My Pre-Season Team

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Sorry if not posting in the correct spot but I'm lost.

I cant seem to pick my team at all. Click edit team and it just reloads the dashboard screen.

Also trying to create a league and no option to do so. Only groups
 
I usually like to have Laird in my team, but after last year, I'm not too sure

After yesterdays internal trial I am looking at possibly getting Laird back in . His scoring has only gone down since Smithers ( came back from injury) and Milera played mainly from half back . Yesterday they both spent the trial swapping between the middle and the wing in rotation with Jones , the Crouches and Sloane . Laird could have the playmaker role from half back his own again . The other issue from the trial was Ned Mc Henry not making the “ firsts “ side so may have to juggle the reserves bench .
 
Sorry if not posting in the correct spot but I'm lost.

I cant seem to pick my team at all. Click edit team and it just reloads the dashboard screen.

Also trying to create a league and no option to do so. Only groups
Clear your browser's cache mate then try again
 
Sorry if not posting in the correct spot but I'm lost.

I cant seem to pick my team at all. Click edit team and it just reloads the dashboard screen.

Also trying to create a league and no option to do so. Only groups

I had the same issue. Clearing cache may work but it didnt for me so i sent a brief email and they sorted it. Not sure what they did but i havent had any issues since
 
Anyone surprised by the low ownership % of Dangerfield and Zac Williams

View attachment 823689

I think Dangers is about right. Gawn at 29% and Doedee/Steven above him at 30/31% is funny

I think ZWill is a better pick then Lloyd but a lot of more casual players wouldn't so Lloyd at 30% and Williams at 22% seems right.

Fyfe at 39% is waaaay too high
 
I think Dangers is about right. Gawn at 29% and Doedee/Steven above him at 30/31% is funny

I think ZWill is a better pick then Lloyd but a lot of more casual players wouldn't so Lloyd at 30% and Williams at 22% seems right.

Fyfe at 39% is waaaay too high
Neale 27% surprises me. Agree Fyfe is too high and I’m a Danger/Fyfe fanboy since 09
 
I think Dangers is about right. Gawn at 29% and Doedee/Steven above him at 30/31% is funny

I think ZWill is a better pick then Lloyd but a lot of more casual players wouldn't so Lloyd at 30% and Williams at 22% seems right.

Fyfe at 39% is waaaay too high
Would a lot of casual players have their teams picked yet ?

Understand Gawn's ownership % .....but why do you think Fyfe's ownership is too high ? .....new Coach, I can see Fyfe having a good season
 
Would a lot of casual players have their teams picked yet ?

Understand Gawn's ownership % .....but why do you think Fyfe's ownership is too high ? .....new Coach, I can see Fyfe having a good season
Set to play more fwd ala Bont - not sure if it’s a good/bad thing
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Set to play more fwd ala Bont - not sure if it’s a good/bad thing
All crap .....PS talk ....the Freo midfield needs Fyfe in there .....that talk is foolish
 
All crap .....PS talk ....the Freo midfield needs Fyfe in there .....that talk is foolish
Exactly why would they play their best player down forward there would be no one to kick it down to him.
 
Exactly why would they play their best player down forward there would be no one to kick it down to him.
Exactly .....Freo's midfield is developing ....but it's nowhere near an "A" grade unit yet

Will be interesting to see if Blakely gets a shot in the mids .....but Freo simply will lose games without Freo in the midfield
 
View attachment 823734
92k in the bank, should i bring in young in defence?
Kelly for Macrea or Dunkley?
Good side Edmund

No to Young .....$190K - $210K rookies, unless special, have had a high failure rate in the past

The only slight on Kelly is durability .....you can afford 1-2 questionable durable players ...just a balancing act

7 on-field rookies maybe too many ....depending on quality of rookies exposed over the PS campaign
 
Would Kelly be the better option to start the season?
i won't have enough to get Kelly and Young.
I think Young is a must have - elite kicking etc

Just keep Dunkley he could avg 125+ - I don’t trust Bevo personally
 
Good side Edmund

No to Young .....$190K - $210K rookies, unless special, have had a high failure rate in the past

The only slight on Kelly is durability .....you can afford 1-2 questionable durable players ...just a balancing act

7 on-field rookies maybe too many ....depending on quality of rookies exposed over the PS campaign
Gould, King, Rowell and Hill would be almost certain starters imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top