They know he's going and they won't get pick 2
This is just more spin to set up the Kick a Vic / AFL Conspiracy narrative and keep the masses on side
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Make that decision next year after we actually (hopefully) see Hayes play some football. I’m a huge fan but he’s still an unknown who’s done an ACL. Unless the suns come offering one of the 2 SA lads it’s not even remotely worth considering, particularly for players who a 3rd rounder should get it done.I don't want to trade Ladhams, but if we hold on to Hayes he won't even be the best ruckman at Port Adelaide in three years.
If we feel a ruckman is surplus and we can get good value in a trade, then time to hark back to the days we were ruthless and put Lycett on the block. For numerous reasons (fear of supporter backlash and over confidence we're 'so close' primarily) we of course won't, but that'd be a move that'd push my estimate of Costanza up, even if the Facebook mum's would crack the shits.I don't want to trade Ladhams, but if we hold on to Hayes he won't even be the best ruckman at Port Adelaide in three years.
Ah, a chance to roll out my favourite rant that the downward spiral of Port, was not started by the 2007 GF, but that the 2004 trade/draft period was spent sipping the bathwater (mission accomplished!). With teams crying out for a KPF, we could have traded Thurstans for a massive premium then. Instead all the time wasted on trying to keep Carr and missing out on Port loving, Crow hating Thompson because of it.Nothing mind blowing in the comments to follow but I think any good trading strategy should draw on the halo effects of good or bad team performance.
For example, when a team is performing well it elevates the status of everyone playing regularly for that team. The opposite is true when teams are underperforming.
But that creates an opportunity to buy players from poor teams ‘low’, sell ‘high’ when your own team is performing well (especially if there are players you know are benefiting from the system/performance of other team members) and avoid trading for average players from other high performers whose own value is being inflated.
Yes, we’ve been reluctant to trade fan favourites in the last few years.If we feel a ruckman is surplus and we can get good value in a trade, then time to hark back to the days we were ruthless and put Lycett on the block. For numerous reasons (fear of supporter backlash and over confidence we're 'so close' primarily) we of course won't, but that'd be a move that'd push my estimate of Costanza up, even if the Facebook mum's would crack the shits.
Yes, we’ve been reluctant to trade fan favourites in the last few years.
Sarcasm.Huh?
I wondered about this too.Caldwell is just what we need.
Also on AA, anyone think we are getting him to be a mobile second for Lycett and that may well spell Ladhams trade?
No current season stats available
One's with clear flaws or that we couldn't 'fix'. Lycett doesn't fall into those categories, so it'd be ruthless to trade him.Yes, we’ve been reluctant to trade fan favourites in the last few years.
Trading either young rucks this year is lunacy, it’s not being ruthless.
Caldwell is just what we need.
Also on AA, anyone think we are getting him to be a mobile second for Lycett and that may well spell Ladhams trade?
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
He is 196cm actually and most definitely classifies as a tall back.Aliir doesn't even classify as a tall back at 194cm.
At this stage I'd send Clurey packing far before McKenzieI understand that but if we get a taller defender we could get some currency for him and out of Cluery and Jonas, he’s most expendable
Yeah tall and massive leap.He is 196cm actually and most definitely classifies as a tall back.
The club use to trot out “he hasn’t got the tank yet” when Hayes’s name was put forward in filling in for Pistol during those 3 weeks off. It always sounded a bit sus, so perhaps the Port hierarchy did not consider Hayes as any good?Would not be trading Ladhams. Everyone keep saying Hayes is the 2nd coming, but the guy has not set foot on an AFL field. How many years of Lycett left? We should be aiming for out next ruck combo to be those 2, not getting rid of one who has shown quite a bit and is still young.
If we feel a ruckman is surplus and we can get good value in a trade, then time to hark back to the days we were ruthless and put Lycett on the block. For numerous reasons (fear of supporter backlash and over confidence we're 'so close' primarily) we of course won't, but that'd be a move that'd push my estimate of Costanza up, even if the Facebook mum's would crack the shits.
Ladhams/Caldwell?
GWS has a need.
Hayes into the first 22 next year.
Seems to be a mostly inside mid. Really would rather quick linebreaking midfielder.I like this!! Caldwell will be a very good mid, a much better player than Hately..
Caldwell requests a trade to essendon