![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/western_sydney.png)
- Oct 6, 2011
- 34,250
- 10,380
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- Patriots, Golden State, Wildcats
Sportsbetseen the hot favs lose before, all it takes is a bad start, poison odds, who has the market for this??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sportsbetseen the hot favs lose before, all it takes is a bad start, poison odds, who has the market for this??
Gotta feel for Petty who will play being the same odds as someone who isn'tGardner interesting at $41 given he's not playing
What’s the thinking here? You genuinely think the Dogs are no chance or an emotional hedge?For those keen to place a bet on Melbourne winning this week, you may be best served to actually bet on the "premiership winner" market on Betfair, rather than the match odds.
For some reason, Melbourne keeps trading at $1.75 in the 'AFL Premiers 2021' market, yet they are trading at $1.73 in the match odds.
View attachment 1242820
View attachment 1242823
View attachment 1242824
View attachment 1242825
Similarly, if you're keen to back the Bulldogs to win, obviously use the 'Match Odds' market to get a superior price.
Wheres that?Any value in the 'To Poll a Vote' market in the Norm Smith Medal? Gotta remember there are 5 judges as well
View attachment 1243983
I won't be carrying any exposure into the game. My current position is if my lay bet on Melbourne at $1.73 gets matched, I'll guarantee myself a three figure return. My initial stake at $1.75 was calculated so I'd make $100 if I could have a lay bet matched at $1.73. I used the match odds as a guide because I figured the odds in that market would be a more accurate representation of the market. I therefore assessed the $1.75 for Melbourne in the premiership market to be overs. That's why I posted here so others could also take advantage.What’s the thinking here? You genuinely think the Dogs are no chance or an emotional hedge?
PointsBet
Maybe Dunkley? Youd think his form would be slowly building after that injury and still getting the mid minutes.Any value in the 'To Poll a Vote' market in the Norm Smith Medal? Gotta remember there are 5 judges as well
View attachment 1243983
Do we know who the judges are going to be for the Norm? Sorry if this has already been answered.
I just had a look and can't find it in this thread.Yeah it’s a few pages back in the thread. Judd, Niall, can’t remember the other two
If Gawn dominates hes put it down the throat of Clarry and Trac all day, hard to see him beating them, especially when a bunch of midfielders are the judging panel from all reports.Back Oliver and Petracca for the medal, with a saver on Gawn. Easiest way to guarantee a juicy return.
All over Bont there, as good as Gawn played last week Rucks just don't have the history and Bevo is way too good of a coach to let him do as he pleases.PointsBet have H2H Most Norm Smith Votes:
Gawn $1.90 v $1.90 The Bont
When does 40+ ever happen in a Grand Final? Odds feel pretty shit to me in all honesty, cannot recall it happening once in the last 20 years but happy to be corrected.Macrae 40+ is $4.50, poison odds IMO
wutAll over Bont there, as good as Gawn played last week Rucks just don't have the history and Bevo is way too good of a coach to let him do as he pleases.
You're getting even money for a midfielder to outpoll a Ruck, Boyd is the only Ruckman to even poll in the last 10 Grand Finals.
You’re much better off taking Bont to poll at $2.40 (PointsBet)You're getting even money for a midfielder to outpoll a Ruck, Boyd is the only Ruckman to even poll in the last 10 Grand Finals.