2021 Non-Crows AFL Discussion Part 1: we can have lots of fun!

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is about the time I go on my anti-Trigg rant

But we all know he's an insufferably arrogant nincompoop.

Should we talk about the back-to-back wooden spoons coaching Sturt?

Tippettgate?

The opening day of membership sales at Carlton?

If you ever needed a lesson in failing upwards, watch this man.

Is mates with Scott Morrison?
 
Glory be. So many, many Duursma's in tonights game of Cricket. That was that much hatching I expected an egg to roll out.


2teams1cup-gif.987819
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You do realise that story is like 10 years old?

Secondly, only in the US, was the obvious reference to their size as a "child", nothing to do with assaulting umpires.
So are we going to draft this little hard nut or parole him.
 
Williams knows why no club has employed him ....he knows this is his last chance ....he surely can't be dumb to repeat past errors
Hasn’t he got brain damage from concussions?
 
I’m glad that Melbourne have picked up Choco. I’m just interested to see if he’s got one more act in him

They’re clearly willing to try something a bit left field. Little to lose from Goody’s point of view

Should add a little interest to the year
 
I’m glad that Melbourne have picked up Choco. I’m just interested to see if he’s got one more act in him

They’re clearly willing to try something a bit left field. Little to lose from Goody’s point of view

Should add a little interest to the year

I just don't see the appeal of Williams. Obviously was a good coach but whenever I have heard him talk the last few years he has sounded really out of touch.

Having said that I think Melbourne should improve this year and Choco will be the first to take the credit
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ahh yeah, except Im pretty sure our camp hadn't even happened when Melb's players all shat themselves.
That’s not very sporting of them. They foresaw that camps are bad especially ours and didn’t warn us.
 
1607672374663.png

SEN’s Sam Edmund first reported a deal has been struck which will force Collingwood to pay the full difference between Treloar’s old contract at the Magpies and his new deal at the Dogs.

However the Bulldogs have agreed to front-load Treloar’s contract, which will give Collingwood some relief in its ongoing salary cap struggle.
 
View attachment 1026694

SEN’s Sam Edmund first reported a deal has been struck which will force Collingwood to pay the full difference between Treloar’s old contract at the Magpies and his new deal at the Dogs.

However the Bulldogs have agreed to front-load Treloar’s contract, which will give Collingwood some relief in its ongoing salary cap struggle.
Surely the AFL could have come to an agreement that puts them both over the cap!
 
View attachment 1026694

SEN’s Sam Edmund first reported a deal has been struck which will force Collingwood to pay the full difference between Treloar’s old contract at the Magpies and his new deal at the Dogs.

However the Bulldogs have agreed to front-load Treloar’s contract, which will give Collingwood some relief in its ongoing salary cap struggle.

This is kind of confusing. How can this part of the deal happen after the trade?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top