Cameron_Jezza
Team Captain
- Sep 12, 2021
- 428
- 409
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Congrats on the flag. I would suggest trading your 2022r2 for richmond pick 40,44 to get the picks to help fill your 6 lost spots.Means we have 6 spots for them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Congrats on the flag. I would suggest trading your 2022r2 for richmond pick 40,44 to get the picks to help fill your 6 lost spots.Means we have 6 spots for them.
There's no way Hawks let Gunston go for pick 30-45
Imagine finishing 2nd last and then having the 4th worst draft hand!? WTF have Collingwood done!?
Always oneThis aged.
This aged.
It’s kind of the best part of this.Plus they’re still paying Treloar. Plus they are still way over this year’s cap. Plus they traded away pick 2. Plus they need more points points for Discos.
It’s so good.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
which draft video? can u link me?Finally got lucky.
Interesting in the draft video from 2019, Richardson was one of the coaches that was saying we should draft Jackson with #3.
which draft video? can u link me?
I think there’s a fair bit of revision going on with McCartin. There was huge pressure on the Saints to pick a key forward - their leading goalkicker was Riewoldt and the club was a real shambles with how Watters was sacked and their on field collapse. They still had Montagna, had just brought in Savage and seemingly had addressed the mids with both Billings and Dunstan.Finally got lucky.
Interesting in the draft video from 2019, Richardson was one of the coaches that was saying we should draft Jackson with #3.
I think there’s a fair bit of revision going on with McCartin. There was huge pressure on the Saints to pick a key forward - their leading goalkicker was Riewoldt and the club was a real shambles with how Watters was sacked and their on field collapse. They still had Montagna, had just brought in Savage and seemingly had addressed the mids with both Billings and Dunstan.
It’s as much about the concussions as anything, and no one could have predicted that.
when a recruiter is willing to put his name to the comments that 17 other clubs had Trac at 1, that is pretty damning.I think there’s a fair bit of revision going on with McCartin. There was huge pressure on the Saints to pick a key forward - their leading goalkicker was Riewoldt and the club was a real shambles with how Watters was sacked and their on field collapse. They still had Montagna, had just brought in Savage and seemingly had addressed the mids with both Billings and Dunstan.
It’s as much about the concussions as anything, and no one could have predicted that.
He was but we were also in the context of the GC/GWS entry years where Lynch, Patton, Boyd and Cameron were all never available, Hogan had just effectively come in for multiple firsts to the Dees and where we had specifically seen the Dogs give up Griffen, pick 6 and $6mil over 7 to get Boyd. The KPF market was insanely hot and they thought they were on the bounce and took him based on that.McCartin was a terrible pick but I do agree that their mids looked alright - Dunstan and Billings were really promising in their early years.
Wonder if Hore could get a decent run whether he could fill Hibbo's role.
The funny thing is Richo was a big advocate for picking Jackson when he came to us. You win some you lose some I guess.
He's an absolute potatoAlso Rendell is a massive captain hindsight so take what he says with a grain of salt.
No chance.There's no way Hawks let Gunston go for pick 30-45
Spot on. Gunston isn't in our best 22. You can't play Fritta and Gunston, and Fritta is better.The issue I have with Gunston is that he plays the same role as Fritsch. He's lost his pace and isn't big enough to contest the high ball in a way that will at keast bring it to ground.
To bring him in means either we lose forward pressure (spargo/Koz) or pack smashing to bring to ground (TMac/Brown) - or we drop our leading goalkicker who plays in a similar way.
He's a great player, but i dont see what we compromise to get him in the starting 22 guarenteed?
This is what interests me about Andrew and where he goes. All the reports are he’s physically raw even with his talent; he’s going to need serious development time though given how undersized he is. But the pressure will come to play him.We don’t need Gunston or anyone really. We have a young list and should be focusing on securing them long term over paying other players to come here.
21 and under we have a ruckman in Jackson, Key defender in Petty, Midfielders in Sparrow and Jordan, small medium defenders in Bowey and Rivers, and small forwards in Spargo, Pickett and Laurie.
We need a young key forward to go with that group and should focus on improving our draft hand. Not sure who is available in the draft, Mac Andrew would be perfect as a 3-4 year development project (just like Petty) and be ready for when Ben Brown and Tom McDonald (both basically 29) are no longer up to the standard. If not Mac someone else.