Eddie Betts?
List Mgmt. 2021 Trade Targets
- Thread starter Ports1870
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Eddie Betts?
As soon as Port strike a deal where we use 16, suddenly the Dawson deal will get done, that takes the threat of Port waiting in the wings out of the equation.
Burton played all 24 games this season so thats a good sign
Richmond did very well out of that.
To get a future 2nd rounder from the bottom team with the first pick in the psd for ccj
Ladhams >>>> ccj
I reckon ccj had a couple of good games at Richmond but I think he’s a risk to bomb at north. Not sure what his best position is yet, can he be a first ruck? Best return so far is 16 hitouts in a game. Just haven’t seen enough of him in the ruck to know.
To get a future 2nd rounder from the bottom team with the first pick in the psd for ccj
Ladhams >>>> ccj
I reckon ccj had a couple of good games at Richmond but I think he’s a risk to bomb at north. Not sure what his best position is yet, can he be a first ruck? Best return so far is 16 hitouts in a game. Just haven’t seen enough of him in the ruck to know.
Unrestricted free agent Tarrant done as a trade, so's not to affect the level of F/A compensation they're getting for Chol.
Doctor Feel
Shitposter In Chief
Why do Port specifically target perennially injured players? Seems like a play to get a good price.
The difference is CCJ plays for a victorian team and Ladhams plays for an "interstate" team
In this scenario anyone who is from a victorian team will always be worth more
Because we want to look outside for quick fix solutions, and funnily enough teams seem more willing to let players with injury issues go more often than stars with no issues.
Yeah so he did, I keep thinking back to that horrible coaching move to ff in the 2020 prelim when he twigged his ham string
If JOM had no injury record and the last 4 years like 2021, he’d take two first rounders. His price is half that with his history.
Burton played 24 games total in his first 2 seasons at Port and then 24 this season so hopefully all his soft tissue injuries are over
Rory Lobb likes this !
The Coleman-Jones trade means North won’t be wasting the first PSD pick on him. Leaves it free for Dawson!!!!
Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 82,756
- 204,407
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
- Moderator
- #7,867
Also shows how reasonable they are being by working an appropriate deal with Richmond so all team benefit, not like the crows who just want to screw clubs over by using the PSD
The sooner the PSD is scrapped the better
only if we win a cup imo. Omeara could win back to back all-aus guernseys but if he’s just here for the last days of hinkleys reign for us to be also-rans I’ll mark it down as a loss.
- Mar 26, 2007
- 21,494
- 46,395
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Anaheim Ducks, White Sox
In what alternative universe is this opinion common.
Quite interesting that we're willing to pay part of Ladhams contract for more draft capital
I'm with you but also agree that we need to strengthen our list both for the short and long-term, irrespective of our coach's glaring weaknesses.
I just don't get the Wingard love. O'Meara on the other hand brings us that speed out of stoppage and running ability that Boak has and is a better replacement for what we will lose when he moves out of the midfield. He will be 28 early next year. You probably expect to get 3 years out of him and pray for a Boak/Burgoyne like extension of his form beyond 30.
We've all been bitten by the failure of "missing link" recruits (Dixon, Ryder, Polec, Rockliff, Aliir) to add trophy-ware to our cabinets. But what do you do? If you can get O'Meara for our current first round pick, or for the pick that we get from Ladhams, I think you'd do it. It would also mark SPP's cards to the point that we'd probably push him out for any second rounder.
If we walk away with Finlayson, O'Meara, pick 30-ish having lost Ladhams, SPP, future third-rounder, it looks like a well-balanced trade period.
Rory Lobb this season..
Similar threads
