Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I like rowe as a player. He has natural footy talent. As the side gets better he is the sort of player who will thrive imo. If he heads to a team like geelong or tge dogs with quality midfield, he might do quite wellRowe to the dogs..
It’s interesting because he’s clearly a natural footballer, but he’s got very clear physical deficiencies at AFL level that hold him back. Personally I think if we’re bringing Rankine in then he’s worth putting up for trade.I like rowe as a player. He has natural footy talent. As the side gets better he is the sort of player who will thrive imo. If he heads to a team like geelong or tge dogs with quality midfield, he might do quite well
Our smalls all have deficiencies yet they give their all and have had patches of solid contribution at different times . Ned and Murphy have definitely improved this last 6 weeks .I like rowe as a player. He has natural footy talent. As the side gets better he is the sort of player who will thrive imo. If he heads to a team like geelong or tge dogs with quality midfield, he might do quite well
Billy Frampton
Elliot Himmelberg
Mitch Hinge
James Rowe
Brett Turner
James Borlase
Tariek Newchurch
Ben Davis
We lost the centre clearances today 19-7.Brown is cooked, but contracted. Hard to see another club being interested, so we're probably stuck with him.
I think Seedsman will be moved to the rookie list, thence to the inactive list, replaced via the PSSP or MSD. Agree that Sholl, Crouch and (apparently) Berg are all likely to be traded (though I'm struggling to think of a club which would have interest in Crouch).
Prefer to stick with the development of Newchurch and trade Murphy who will have trade currency and if Rankine comes then trade or delist Rowe.Our smalls all have deficiencies yet they give their all and have had patches of solid contribution at different times . Ned and Murphy have definitely improved this last 6 weeks .
As our team evolves and players like Taylor and Cook with Rankine * come in it will be good for the squad to have those 3 to fight it out for a spot .
Won't happen.We lost the centre clearances today 19-7.
There might well be Crouch rumblings for selection next week.
Wait for the epic melts on Thursday night if it happens.
Former recruiter calls out Crows criticism, claims they’re “way better” than competition thinks
“The Crows have been playing like this for quite a while.”www.sen.com.au
Fair callPrefer to stick with the development of Newchurch and trade Murphy who will have trade currency and if Rankine comes then trade or delist Rowe.
So it's now 3 senior list players that aren't contracted. Fair to say none of them have trade value now given they all must be delisted anyway to use minimum draft picks. Even if Crouch goes, that's still 2 of 3 that must be delisted, value won't be increasing at all.
edit - forgot SANFL stalwart Turner is on senior list. What a joke.
Rather give Davis another year than keep Turner.Nah, Turner (and all midseason draftees) are Cat A rookies.
Also, it’s highly likely that a current player on our senior list will be downgraded to the rookie list this offseason to make room for an incoming player or draft pick. Himmelberg and Rowe are the most likely candidates.
Assuming list sizes remain the same (which they might not), I think our senior list changes will be as follows:
Out:
Crouch (trade)
Sholl (trade)
Frampton (trade / delist)
Rowe (delist or send to rookie list)
Himmelberg (trade or send to rookie list)
** note: NEITHER of Rowe or Himmelberg will be on our senior list next year IMO, but I think ONE (not both) will be on our rookie list
In:
3x draft picks including Michalanney
Rankine
One more player acquired via trade
Cat A Rookie list changes will be as follows:
Out:
Davis (delisted)
In:
One of Himmelberg or Rowe (with the other one leaving the club)
Turner’s position on the rookie list will depend on whether we have someone in mind after the end of the National Draft who we prefer over Turner. If someone is there who we like enough, Turner gets dumped to make way. If no one is there, Brett sticks around.
Maybe just maybe the other clubs knew something when they didn’t interview Turner, a Hamish special
I agree would be dominant in a good team. People forget he is considered elite for effective possessions suggesting a elite decision maker.I like rowe as a player. He has natural footy talent. As the side gets better he is the sort of player who will thrive imo. If he heads to a team like geelong or tge dogs with quality midfield, he might do quite well
Doubt it, though could be from the media.We lost the centre clearances today 19-7.
There might well be Crouch rumblings for selection next week.
Wait for the epic melts on Thursday night if it happens.
Yeah I wasn't aware Berry had the job on LDU in second half but you'd have to say he did a decent job, the impact come off the match in a big way.Doubt it, though coul be from the media.
Berry changed the game fornuswth the job he did in the 2nd half on LDU at CBAs.
Nah, Turner (and all midseason draftees) are Cat A rookies.
Also, it’s highly likely that a current player on our senior list will be downgraded to the rookie list this offseason to make room for an incoming player or draft pick. Himmelberg and Rowe are the most likely candidates.
Assuming list sizes remain the same (which they might not), I think our senior list changes will be as follows:
Out:
Crouch (trade)
Sholl (trade)
Frampton (trade / delist)
Rowe (delist or send to rookie list)
Himmelberg (trade or send to rookie list)
** note: NEITHER of Rowe or Himmelberg will be on our senior list next year IMO, but I think ONE (not both) will be on our rookie list
In:
3x draft picks including Michalanney
Rankine
One more player acquired via trade
Cat A Rookie list changes will be as follows:
Out:
Davis (delisted)
In:
One of Himmelberg or Rowe (with the other one leaving the club)
Turner’s position on the rookie list will depend on whether we have someone in mind after the end of the National Draft who we prefer over Turner. If someone is there who we like enough, Turner gets dumped to make way. If no one is there, Brett sticks around.
Yeah I wasn't aware Berry had the job on LDU in second half but you'd have to say he did a decent job, the impact come off the match in a big way.
When I suggested something similar along those lines I got howled down..Reeks of list management silencing talent ID.
His close attention at cba was impressive, kept touch on him the whole time.Did a great job. LDU only had 9-10 touches second half after 24-25 at half time
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
You said Nicks influenced us selecting him and that Ogilvie shouldn’t be held responsible because he wouldn’t have seen him much.When I suggested something similar along those lines I got howled down..
All I got was Hamish Hamish Hamish by the usual suspects.
You must be be very special because they haven't teed off on you for suggesting very similar.
I've got no doubt Turner's stellar Glenelg game against us early in the season was a factor in us selecting him and I'd be very surprised if Hamish or Justin who are both Victorian based would have been in attendance.
What will be most interesting will be whether he's offered a rookie spot for 2023.
That does worry me a little bit, sounds like the club feels like they’ve done their stint at the pointy end of the draft and wants to push up the ladder next year. From a list management perspective that shouldn’t be our goal, if they young group improves and that’s what gets us there next year fantastic, but we should be willing to cop another year out of finals and a high draft pick.
Happy to spend first rounders bringing in Rankine and JHF types, but if the club is looking at someone like Dunkley that would be a mistake IMO.
More likely Godden and the SANFL assistants than Nick's.You said Nicks influenced us selecting him and that Ogilvie shouldn’t be held responsible because he wouldn’t have seen him much.
That is just bullshit.
As for 1970crow post, he’s not always right but he has a bit more credibility than you when it comes to assessing Hamish’s drafting
Probably not..If Seeds and the club decide he needs to call it quits can we still pay his contract out and not have it count towards salary cap?