List Mgmt. 2022 List Management: Draft, Trade and FA

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
If we do end up trading with Melbourne I think they would prefer Meek to Lobb, I don't think they have any rucks after Gawn and Jackson and Lobb is too old to be in a succession plan.
 
freo_leo29 said:
I don't think Jackson comes but if he does come then Lobb is 100% gone, he is already a chance to go but he definitely leaves is Jackson comes

Frees up his position, frees up cap space and adds a pick to our trade capital, its a no brainer
Click to expand...
Well Lobb would theoretically get to remain 100% a key forward if we land Jacko which is what he wants? I really don't want to lose Lobb, our next two KPFs in Amiss and Treacy are still years away from replicating his scoreboard impact.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Snuffaluphagus said:
We will have done well to get one of Jackson or Gus, I really dont see how it's possible to get both. Aside from the fact that getting two top 15 players from a premiership side has never been done before there is the fact that;
1) Getting one gives Melbourne money to pay the other enough to probably make them stay
2) There is no way we have the trade capital to trade for both. Melbourne would force a trade for Gus as an RFA, if anything, just to fu** over a team stealing two of their best players while both teams are in a trade window. Getting Gus as a RFA is already dependent on Melbourne thinking a pick from 17-20 is close enough to also save on the capspace and show Gus goodwill, I'd imagine they'd match immediately if we look like getting both.
Click to expand...

The Free Agency window closes very early in the trade period and Jackson going on holiday for that period of time allows both to occur.

Brayshaw is done for cash. Melbourne let him go. They have the money now to offer Jackson a bigger contract, but the reality of that decision is that they knew Brayshaw was going and have already allocated his cash by that time.

We need Brayshaw to be done first then,
Trade future second for Cam Zurhaar
Trade a contacted Lobb for everything we can get and hopefully it's Melbourne that want him - if so, skip to step three
Trade for Jackson with whatever we have available. We won't have a future first available without getting a future second back as part of the deal.

Ends up with 2022 First, 2023 First for Jackson and Melbourne's future second. (if we can retain anything from a Lobb trade I'll be happy)
 
Taylor said:
The Free Agency window closes very early in the trade period and Jackson going on holiday for that period of time allows both to occur.

Brayshaw is done for cash. Melbourne let him go. They have the money now to offer Jackson a bigger contract, but the reality of that decision is that they knew Brayshaw was going and have already allocated his cash by that time.

We need Brayshaw to be done first then,
Trade future second for Cam Zurhaar
Trade a contacted Lobb for everything we can get and hopefully it's Melbourne that want him - if so, skip to step three
Trade for Jackson with whatever we have available. We won't have a future first available without getting a future second back as part of the deal.

Ends up with 2022 First, 2023 First for Jackson and Melbourne's future second. (if we can retain anything from a Lobb trade I'll be happy)
Click to expand...
I’d love for you to be given one trade period in charge, the shenanigans would be hilarious
 
Snuffaluphagus said:
I’d love for you to be given one trade period in charge, the shenanigans would be hilarious
Click to expand...
I don't want to be in charge. I want to be sitting at the back of the room with a smug smile on my face when Walls gets called a sneaky C word.
 
Snuffaluphagus said:
I think this is reflective of the change in performance. Draft picks are meh for the next two years, we have talent. Now the challenge is keeping the talent
Click to expand...
I still rate a mid teens pick but definitely value keeping our talent over picking up new talent to develop, bringing in ready made talent is good as long as it doesn't ruin our ability to keep our talent.
 
When you look at most of our best players there is a common thread, we drafted them via the National Draft. It's working don't get sucked into the poaching established players at other clubs, it's a financial drain and it hasn't worked in the past. Keep doing what we have been doing because it's working.
 
JammoMonty said:
This is a ridiculous article. WCE f****d up with the Tim Kelly deal. Set the club back 3 years. They will not throw the kitchen sink at Jackson for a rebuild. There’s going to be a lot more noise after the bye on Jackson’s contract. From what I’m hearing he’s made his mind up with Melbourne and heading home. Has knocked back two contracts so far. The two year extension everyone expected him to sign (myself included) and rejected was the biggest hint yet he wanted to return to WA.
Click to expand...
WC won't give up pick one or two for Jackson, not that Jackson would want to come to a club at the start of a rebuild.
We are running so deep at them moment that we can afford a couple of drafts to have minimal picks.
If Lobb goes we would be right into Jackson, it will cost us our 1st this year and 1st next year, we will probably get a second back (maybe).
 
These are the players who were added to our list either by directly trading for them or as part of a trade for the pick they were taken with:
Sam Sturt, Griffin Logue, Caleb Serong, Sean Darcy, Jordan Clark, Andrew Brayshaw, Blake Acres, Aish, Ryan, Wilson, Brodie, Tucker, Hamling, Henry, Amiss, Chapman, O'Driscoll, Colyer, Cox, Lobb, Johnson

Trading is part of list management.

Some of those above might have been taken with our actual pick and others I've assumed were might not have been, but you get the picture.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Waterhouzin said:
A Jackson for Lobb plus picks makes sense if so, keeps Melbourne in the window and all players are happy.
Our picks wont be anything special but we could sweeten it all by offering Angus Brayshaw a very good front loaded deal as a free agent so that Melbourne also score a high pick as compensation.
Belly will drop the mic and load up with feathers if this all comes to fruition!!🤣🤣


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...
Compo for Melbourne would be first round after their pick, or start of second round wouldn't it?
 
CapitalA said:
If we do end up trading with Melbourne I think they would prefer Meek to Lobb, I don't think they have any rucks after Gawn and Jackson and Lobb is too old to be in a succession plan.
Click to expand...
Apparently they got a gun ruck in the VFL so they're pretty well stocked
 
I wonder if they are clones of David Mundy,,,;);):cool::cool:
280039803_2527906490684942_5611208333259832132_n.jpg
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

go_the_dockers
  • Poll
List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets
807 808 809 810 811
Replies
20K
Views
871K
CaseySibosadoHOF
CaseySibosadoHOF
Lore
  • Locked
List Mgmt. 2023 List Management thread - Pt2 Now With Added Wailing & Gnashing of Teeth
304 305 306 307 308
Replies
8K
Views
323K
Snuffaluphagus
Snuffaluphagus
G
The 2022 draft
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
apuchar
apuchar
Purple7x08_24
21st century mock draft
Replies
0
Views
205
Purple7x08_24
Purple7x08_24
Tonga Bob
  • Sticky
Women's Footy AFLW Buddy Draft 2024 - Run & Done
2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Tonga Bob
Tonga Bob
purplerunsdeep2
List Mgmt. 2024 Mid Season Draft
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
275
Views
16K
Swiggy
S
Lach72
  • Locked
List Mgmt. 2023 List Management thread
499 500 501 502 503
Replies
13K
Views
563K
Midnite65
Midnite65

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top