List Mgmt. 2023 List Management and Trading

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Geezuz.. go back and read the thread..

He placed EVERY stat of laird side by side with EVERY stat of Cripps’s..

If he wasnt fxkking comparingbthe pair then what the fxxk was he doing?..

Ffs.. I’m not the one constantly moving the goal posts here..

I simply said I couldnt give a flying toss bag about the stats.. even attempting to compare laird and cripps in any way is just laughable.

He bought cripps and stats into the conversation.. not me.
Nice try Clam.

Still trying to lose your initial rubbish in a storm of bulldust?

I posted a link to the comparison between Laird and Cripps (where the site lists the stats for each side by side) AFTER you posted the reason Laird was a b-grader being his kicking and his poor shots on goal. As I have said since, this was to highlight that using Disposal Efficiency and Clangers and even Goal Accuracy to determine an A-Grader in the midfield was flawed.

I understand why you say it's laughable to compare Laird to Cripps - that was why I chose Cripps. Duh. I knew you would love Cripps and dream of Laird being like him ... even though he is comparable if not worse in the exact stats you were proclaiming made Laird ordinary.

You are trying to move the goal posts - You are also trying to amass a full 22 built of straw men.

Just admit that your reasoning for Laird not being "A-Grade" was wrong, and all is fine and dandy.

I don't expect you concede ... you will try and say that you are the f#!@$% smart one, because nothing screams intelligent point making like a few filtered out expletives. But, as I have not spent as much time on construction sites as you, I'm somehow now a snowflake.

Laird is a good footballer. The reason he is not the elite top of the pile game breaker has nothing to do with the traits you tried to sneak through with your usual dribble.

And just for fun, Keays is best 22 all day long.
 
In the end you have to make list changes.

I think all we could offer was two years and he would of wanted longer. He has never been great at looking after himself and given he is getting older I can see why we did what we did.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mcadam's manager or McAdam himself has fed this fitness department spat story to Rooch and evidently okayed the release of this information.

Very interesting (******* stupid) tactic to publicly take on Darren Burgess.

Each to their own, not something I would have done.
Being unhappy with the fitness department is probably a lie, but if it was true it says he didn't like hard work. Burgess is as good as they get
 
From a whole of list management perspective there maybe more to it.

It's possible Gollant got offered something better from an interstate club and we convinced him to stay promising more opportunities.

That's a very long bow but there may well be more to it from a list management perspective.
 
Melb have picks 5, 15,24,34.
24 would be what I'd ask for. I'd take 34 though.

I love McAdam. He's been a fave of mine. Still ok with him going tho. Maybe we will keep Newchurch? Or maybe this is where the Hayward rumors originate from??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top