Better Loosen Up
Brownlow Medallist
I still prefer McKercher and pick 14 than Reid. I just don't think there's that much difference between the two and i think McKercher's game suits our needs better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
GC would be well aware how hard Vic clubs are coming for Ben King over the next 12 months. Their dream scenario is a future forward line featuring both King and Walter. Their nightmare is having neither.Pick two, and, assuming we get it, pick 3. Maybe.
Wouldn't Walter be a tantalalising addition to our team.
The actual pick numbers are irrelevant - as is the fact you’re only moving one spot in the draft.Completely disagree myself. It’s a one pick upgrade for us and one down for them, but they get an extra first rounder.
Further to this the massive haul the Bulldogs are offering is not that flash when it’s pushed back with various picks and they would be expecting to make finals next year.If West Coast trade with anyone but us they get neither Reid or Curtin and quite likely McKercher. They couldn’t sell that to their supporters and rightly so.
They managed it last year - splitting a high pick and getting two good players but none of the top tierIf West Coast trade with anyone but us they get neither Reid or Curtin and quite likely McKercher. They couldn’t sell that to their supporters and rightly so.
I think the dogs picks will very similar to what they stand at now when the Walter bid comes in. McKay compo the only likely effect at that stage.Further to this the massive haul the Bulldogs are offering is not that flash when it’s pushed back with various picks and they would be expecting to make finals next year.
My understanding is the Dogs offered those picks to gc for pick 4. Not to WC.I doubt Walter slips past 10, so the first will be 12 or worse. The 17 will slip into the 20’s. How would you feel about giving up pick 1 for 12, 21 and a f1 (likely in the teens)?
It may well be Reid + McKercher v McKercher, Curtin &14I still prefer McKercher and pick 14 than Reid. I just don't think there's that much difference between the two and i think McKercher's game suits our needs better.
It may well be Reid + McKercher v McKercher, Curtin &14
It may well be Reid + McKercher v McKercher, Curtin &14
I think it’s fair. Might look a bit silly trading the port pick for Reid, but that’s what you get if you finish second last. Kinda have to deal with itIf find it a bit weird that people don't want to give up 2 and 14 for Reid, but are ok with trading up from 14 or 19 to get Caddy or O'Sullivan inside 10. If we give up 14, we can potentially get back inside 15 with future pick(s) to clubs who need them. If we can get away with not giving up 14 this year then great, but I have a feeling the picks might move around a bit.
Ethan Read getting top 3 in the 2km time trial is a huge result for a big fella. Lifts him into the top 10 surely.
It’s incredible effort. 2 seconds slower than Hollands time last year and he was an athletic freak this year.
That's just stoopid. Walter wont slip past 2.I doubt Walter slips past 10, so the first will be 12 or worse. The 17 will slip into the 20’s. How would you feel about giving up pick 1 for 12, 21 and a f1 (likely in the teens)?
Reid even, 'eh Hearts to hearts ?14 will definitely go for Harley.
Dirk Gently confirms that holistically, trading JHF for Wardlaw and Ried is the panacea we as North Melbourne deserve.