thylacine60
Post-Human
- Banned
- #1,001
objection - relevance, your honour..........Just as a bit of an aside, wondering if AFL is the only team sport you watch?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
objection - relevance, your honour..........Just as a bit of an aside, wondering if AFL is the only team sport you watch?
That kick, to a key forward, is a near certain goal. Do you disagree?I mean sure some commentators can be annoying or buffoons, but the way you are completely disregarding my point is strange.
If it were only 1 or 2 commentators who had this opinion then fine, but every commentator who covers footy on TV or radio would talk about a team that was in our position wanting to slow it down and take no risks.
Hodge and Daisy both said it in our game. As I said, every commentator would say the team losing wants to get the ball out in space and put speed on the ball while the one winning wants to keep it slow and in tight.
Why would every commentator say that, many ex footy players? Hodge saying that provides no extra drama or whatever you are insinuating as a commentator, he's simply providing an observation of a mistake and tactical flaw we made. One shared by pretty much every commentator.
It absolutely was not a near certain goal. LoB did amazingly well in the end, but it was Harry and 5 Richmond players in our defensive 50. All our other players had pushed back deep as per instruction to flood our backline...a fast break isn't optimal in that situation we didn't have enough players forward of the ball.
It is one thing Harry has done throughout his short career which I was hoping he would develop out of -- his arse goes to ground a lot in and around contests while Oppo hold there feet ..Slipping over isn't an excuse. Harrly slipped over in 2 contests late in the game, the Richmond players didn't.
Lynch didn't slip in big moments either.
flip side is the pies won around 10 games last year by 12 points or less - or was it 12 games by 10 or less? either way - ****!Just glass half full:
Out last 3 games for premiership points we’ve lost by a combined 6 pts to 3 top 8 teams,2 of those games without SWalsh.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
American sports tend to try to have these kind of 'programmable' players. I think the thinking may be different if you watch more American sports is all, a lot of 'optimizing' strategies and 'clutch' time plans.No, it's not. I'm also not sure I like the implication you're about to make.
MIA.Anyone know what happened to Zac Fisher? Got 6 possessions in Q1, then one possession in Q2, and nothing for the rest of the game. Was on the field for 80 of 120 mins.
That's better than whatever I was thinking you were getting at!American sports tend to try to have these kind of 'programmable' players. I think the thinking may be different if you watch more American sports is all, a lot of 'optimizing' strategies and 'clutch' time plans.
1.42min left on the clock (Score - Us 58, them 52)
Gov kicks out of Tigers defence to Motlop
Motlop handballs to LOB
LOB's run & pinpoint pass to Harry & if Harry had marked the ball instead of slipping/falling over, could have shaved 30sec off the clock, kicked a behind or goal and game OVER!
you'll make your views known and like it............I don't recall a piece of play ever being as discussed as much as last night's Motlop, O'Brien, Harry sequence. I have some views but feel like it's already been covered from every possible angle lol.
RIP Brooksy1991I never said that.........
1.42min left on the clock (Score - Us 58, them 52)
Gov kicks out of Tigers defence to Motlop
Motlop handballs to LOB
LOB's run & pinpoint pass to Harry & if Harry had marked the ball instead of slipping/falling over, could have shaved 30sec off the clock, kicked a behind or goal and game OVER!
I know Reg, I’m sorry having a go at you personally, but I chose you because you’re a quality regular as opposed to the usual rank and file nuffies that only play the blame game on one significant, in their eyes moment out of literally hundreds.I’m in no way blaming LOB for the loss. It’s a game of inches and there were several “inches” which let us down in that last 5 minutes, by several players. Was just fresh of my mind and I needed to vent, but it’s not the sole reason as to why we lost.
All four (Mots, Fish, Martin and Owies) seemed to be too far up the ground most of the time.Back line was good…
Midfield was ok, look slow…
Forward line was ordinary, except for Mots who was buzzing around. Harry and Charlie needed the run, Owies, no words. Martin needs to be closer to goal as he has the skill to make something out of nothing…
Really lacked leg speed…
Easy to see why Voss was so furious about the Cuners incident. Imagine a high HF who can create scores and win his own footy out there last night.
Some incredibly weird takes in here. If anyone should be copping it it's Harry.
Missed two extremely easy goals and then fell over for no reason when the game was there to be won. Played a very good game overall but is exhibiting some worrying signs re: mental midgetry.
And other than Harry not another Carlton player within cooey?******* Sheeran !!
Reading a fair bit about how we handle close games.
I think many have the last 2 games embedded in the memory, 2 games against strong top 8 sides last year
Last year, games 12 points and under, 3 and 3. No doubt we need to be better, but some of the melts are a little heavy
As for this s**t about Voss being out coached, the game was close all game, not a landslide loss