Trades 2023 Round 2 Fantasy Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
at least Xerri and jones did you a favour and got injured week 1, rather than be spuds for 3 weeks, and then you stuck with poor scores, no cash gen, and behind everyone else who are already using trades to upgrade their team.
Xerri was a ****ing jet mate. Would have been a top 3 ruck in the week on the trajectory he was on.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Am I crazy for considering Bont > Ziebell and Xerri > English? (Already have green, Setterfield, JHF).

I’m super bullish on Ziebell and I think averages 90 from here priced at 64 or so. Plus gets me the best ruck and deals with an injury. Pretty confident English can average 110 and be the top ruck.

Gives me 160k to fix up Rookies next week.
 
Am I crazy for considering Bont > Ziebell and Xerri > English? (Already have green, Setterfield, JHF).

I’m super bullish on Ziebell and I think averages 90 from here priced at 64 or so. Plus gets me the best ruck and deals with an injury. Pretty confident English can average 110 and be the top ruck.

Gives me 160k to fix up Rookies next week.

I would say yes, youre crazy. Find the cash elsewhere, don't trade Bont
 
I did suspect he could lose his spot regardless so I have planned for it. On field wise it won't hurt me too much as I will have to keep Bruhn and play him in that spot.

It's more about losing a potential good cash gen rookie and trade plans are put back even further. 3 moves behind the rest the comp now
Yeah, disappointing news on Bytel ....I'm now trading him out, but prepared to trade him back in & get his cash increases .....I'm not holding injured players

So change in trade plans .....my, isn't 6 hours in Fantasy a long time 🤣

1679392622088.png
 
Yeah, disappointing news on Bytel ....I'm now trading him out, but prepared to trade him back in & get his cash increases .....I'm not holding injured players

So change in trade plans .....my, isn't 6 hours in Fantasy a long time 🤣

View attachment 1635945
It can be like a lifetime for some - died a million deaths in their mind;)
:tearsofjoy:
 
2103 over the weekend so happy with that

1679397374539.png

Rookie correction trade Johnson > Chandler
Nothing really jumps out for the second trade. If anyone has any ideas, hit me
 
It seems like they have put a lot of effort into the trading mechanism on the site....

1679397980787.png

I was looking at:

Cowan out - Uwland back, Davey to mids, Pedlar in as Util
Cummings out - Cox in.

What a ****ing crock of shit....
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

2103 over the weekend so happy with that

View attachment 1636021

Rookie correction trade Johnson > Chandler
Nothing really jumps out for the second trade. If anyone has any ideas, hit me
Try and get Flanders to Ziebell .....rest looks good
 
2103 over the weekend so happy with that

View attachment 1636021

Rookie correction trade Johnson > Chandler
Nothing really jumps out for the second trade. If anyone has any ideas, hit me
How much in the bank?
Obvious one is Flanders, Have Horne-Francis, Powell and Bruhn.
If not just change rookies if any extra red dots.
 
2103 over the weekend so happy with that

View attachment 1636021

Rookie correction trade Johnson > Chandler
Nothing really jumps out for the second trade. If anyone has any ideas, hit me
flanders to worpol

and put chandler F6

I watched a half of that GC game, and flanders was playing small fwd... thats a position you dont need in your life for 500k+
 
Happy with this currently .....nailed all the Rookies

Planning to get Laird in 2-3 weeks .....I love shopping at Op Shops 🤑

View attachment 1635350
I’ve looked at this but with Jones instead of Chesser. Means fielding Wilmot at D6. Out of interest do you have Green? Because that’s the only thing holding me back from this…is it means fading Green
 
I’ve looked at this but with Jones instead of Chesser. Means fielding Wilmot at D6. Out of interest do you have Green? Because that’s the only thing holding me back from this…is it means fading Green
I don't have Green .....I have him in SC but not Fantasy .....don't think my POV on him has changed after one game (yet)
 
flanders to worpol

and put chandler F6

I watched a half of that GC game, and flanders was playing small fwd... thats a position you dont need in your life for 500k+
Dunno about putting Chandler at F6. He won’t be scoring 100 again and could easily drop a 30-40. I’d keep Flanders and get Chandler for your bench at most.
 
Dunno about putting Chandler at F6. He won’t be scoring 100 again and could easily drop a 30-40. I’d keep Flanders and get Chandler for your bench at most.

Thought Chandler's tackling demonstrated that he has a pretty strong floor in his scoring.
 
Dunno about putting Chandler at F6. He won’t be scoring 100 again and could easily drop a 30-40. I’d keep Flanders and get Chandler for your bench at most.
its not really flanders vs chandler
its
Uwland + flanders vs Chandler vs Worpol

you could always get Pedlar instead, more JS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top