List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread II - Goldy&Bucket➡️✅/'24 EoFR & #44➡️Stephens&#25✅/#21&#25➡️Fisher&#17✅/'24 EoFR➡️#18✅

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hello Shinboners!

The embedded resources below are kept up to date by the trade board mods (as much as possible – we are human after all). Enjoy!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Today he writes that they might not achieve band 1. Tomorrow he writes about how Clarko said that we will only accept Band 1. Next day he writes what a trade would look like if we matched them. The day after that he writes it’s more likely than not that we achieve band 1.

I could be wrong but this creates a lot of content and keeps Ralph’s in a job.

I think we could get ChatGPT to replace Ralphy
Correct. Then Friday comes and free agency starts, McKay is the first one done and band 1 is given to us
 
I think everyone needs to calm down.....all these articles stating this and that, is just speculation to get clicks. As both WCE and NM showed last year, they are willing to sit down in good faith so everyone gets what they want, in a reasonable fashion. We wont want the easgles to get screwed and they wont want us to. I am guessing that to help their rebuild, they will be looking to get at least a couple of shots at the first round, with the number of them depending how high they are, and we would like to get Reid. If it can't be worked out, they will take Reid and we will take our picks.

This nonsense of them just taking Curtain at 1 is nonsense, and wont happen. We either trade up to 1 and get Ried or we pick from the rest.
 
Assuming North get 3 as compo for McKay

North give: 2, 19, F19, F20
North get: 1, 20

GC give: 5
GC get: 19, F19, F20, no bids on Walter with first three picks

Eagles give: 1, 20
Eagles get: 2, 5

^^^ From the Wc board.

I like.

North hand ends up 1, 3, 14, 20. ....maybe a little too good looking at that.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

I can't see that happening. North and WC to combine later picks to snare GC pick 4(5).

And then only if North get Pick 3 compo for McKay will this scenario work.



North 1 and 3
WC 2 and 4(5)

North will keep 3 as we will be using more collateral than WC to help snare the GC pick.



Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk
North get Reid & Curtin.

West Coast get McKercher and Sanders. Midfield rebuild well on the way for them with 4 first round mids picked in 2 years. Would make sense for them to keep the two Tassie kids together. All seems too good to be true.
 
Today he writes that they might not achieve band 1. Tomorrow he writes about how Clarko said that we will only accept Band 1. Next day he writes what a trade would look like if we matched them. The day after that he writes it’s more likely than not that we achieve band 1.

I could be wrong but this creates a lot of content and keeps Ralph’s in a job.

I think we could get ChatGPT to replace Ralphy
As I’ve said, North matching is not what North, Essendon, McKay or McKay’s Manager want.

The media on the other hand would love it as it would cause a lot of interest/discussions.
 
^^^ From the Wc board.

I like.

North hand ends up 1, 5, 14, 20. ....maybe a little too good looking at that.
Comedy Central Lol GIF by The Jim Jefferies Show
 
With all the West Coast players that have retired, do West Coast really need to dump Gaff's money?

I suppose that they might want to start front-loading existing contracts.

What they need pales in comparison to the ability to say it’s Gaffening.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

^^^ From the Wc board.

I like.

North hand ends up 1, 3, 14, 20. ....maybe a little too good looking at that.

In that scenario we can just trade 2, 19, F19 and F20 to Eagles for 1 and 20 so we don't need to be involved with their trade with GC.

That would be two end of first round picks plus downgrading 19 to 20 to move from 2 to 1. It seems steep but it isn't the worst trade proposed.

I think we are also in talks with GC for pick 4, for their pick 4/5 so it might be an issue involving them in a trade for 1.
 
Now if we were to downgrade one of those future PPs into a future second of some type, that I can get behind. Even WC's future third rounder wouldn't be a bad deal.

Dunno, maybe just me but I think the sweet spot for upgrading 2 to 1 is somewhere between 1 of the future PP's and both of them. Just have to find the right way to do it and keep everyone happy.
 
Hey DuckYeah, just curious to know how you know about Lowanna College and your thoughts on it? Cheers.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Mirboo North High ….. not dux 😂 I have no faith in any town of gippsland these days. I went back to the mother land after we sold our farm over a decade ago, a decade between visits and its nothing how I remember it. Its sad, it really is, what from my memory and i’d say everyone elses memory, the place (latrobe valley) had so much going for it. Then once the privatisation of powerstations the first initial decline after, and farming absolutely dismantled by free trade. The joints ****ed. Based on current economic dispositions of the surrounding towns, Lowanna will be sub par state education.

And I doubt we’ll see an AFL player from that region for some time. Even though, in the day, Latrobe Valley was a red hot region for young footballers. We’ll see a few here n there but not to the level they were once were.
 
Last edited:
I hope we go to WCE and offer pick 2 for pick 1 straight swap. I wouldn't even offer up Liam Anthony as a sweetener. * them and their problems.
Being that WCE helped us land Sheez and the Warlord, I'd be happy to work with them a bit. If it was Dodo they were dealing with my response would be much different.
 
Now if we were to downgrade one of those future PPs into a future second of some type, that I can get behind. Even WC's future third rounder wouldn't be a bad deal.

Dunno, maybe just me but I think the sweet spot for upgrading 2 to 1 is somewhere between 1 of the future PP's and both of them. Just have to find the right way to do it and keep everyone happy.
I don't want to get too conspiratorial, but maybe one of those future picks was given to us and we are just temporarily holding the other for our mates in Perth.

So we give them both but we only ever really had one to begin with.
 
As I’ve said, North matching is not what North, Essendon, McKay or McKay’s Manager want.

The media on the other hand would love it as it would cause a lot of interest/discussions.

I don't really see it benefitting Essendon if we match.
 
IMG_2053.JPG
bit flat on this but assuming we must have something else cooking in the ruck department. can’t see Clarko willingly going into the season with Xerri as number 1.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top