Wonder if Adelaide would bid for #3 if that happens....????Sounds too straight forward.
1. Smith
2. FOS
3. Draper
A crow’s worst nightmare.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Wonder if Adelaide would bid for #3 if that happens....????Sounds too straight forward.
1. Smith
2. FOS
3. Draper
A crow’s worst nightmare.
It'll be kinda like 2010 all over again, when we were 'the worst team since Fitzroy' and lost our first nine games before a glorious win over Port in the slop in Adelaide. Didn't even end up with the spoon. As a fan I really enjoyed that year. But that team had Jack Riewoldt winning the Coleman (at 21, in the second-bottom team, what a champion), as well as young Cotchin, Martin, Edwards, Rance, Astbury and Grimes on the list if not all in the ones at that stage.Trying to get ahead of the Tassie draft concessions. I can understand why but jeez 2025 is going to get ugly for them.
Agree. Only caveat... Norf may back themselves to finish ahead of Saints and/or Dees next year, and so might consider adding F1 to pick 2. But they'd really want to be confident it would work out that way.I'm just not seeing the NM pick split happening in the end despite all the talk.
If Richmond offer 6+18 for 2 is that worth it for North Melbourne? Surely North would rather just ensure they get who they want (even if they are reaching for somebody), as opposed to hoping in exchange for an extra pick that'll be in the 20s after bids.
On the flipside I don't see how Richmond could offer 6+10/11. It's too much. As much as they would like the top 2 picks, they can get another gun mid prospect at 6 plus add a KPP at 10/11 which is surely smarter early in a rebuild. Reid/Smillie + Tauru/Armstrong/Trainor > Smith/FOS/Lalor.
Saints and Dees would want something substantial back from North to part with both top 10 picks. I'm not sure North would be keen on that. If they were willing to swap both top 10s for pick 2, I imagine they would have gone harder at WC pick 3.
Trying to get ahead of the Tassie draft concessions. I can understand why but jeez 2025 is going to get ugly for them.
Agree. Only caveat... Norf may back themselves to finish ahead of Saints and/or Dees next year, and so might consider adding F1 to pick 2. But they'd really want to be confident it would work out that way.
Yeah, thought that to. They could also do 2+F1 for 6+10 from Richmond. Richmond's might be keen if they want to spread out their picks. But North sure would want to be confident. Super Risky and a big premium to pay to move their pick forward into this years draft from 2025.
I would expect the dees to go for Tauru. Jason Taylor generally likes the tough types and the only time that he's gone for soft ones (aka Jefferson, Weideman) has been because we've been so desperate for forwards so I expect Tauru, then Langford and I'd imagine we'd look at Armstrong at 9 but I'm not sold on Armstrong. So many of his goals are crumbing type goals and his kicking looks horrible just from his highlights. Seems to helicopter so many goals. But that's just me, I could be wrong. I've heard he's a great contested mark but not many of his highlights show his great contested marks. There's many more contested mark highlights in Tauru's.if we keep 2 i expect us to take lalor or FOS
top 4 not incl FS i think is locked in some order Lalor, FOS, Jagga, Draper
dees at 5 is hard to predict do they go Langford, Tauru or armstrong?
I assume Tauru is after the Kako bid of courseI would expect the dees to go for Tauru. Jason Taylor generally likes the tough types and the only time that he's gone for soft ones (aka Jefferson, Weideman) has been because we've been so desperate for forwards so I expect Tauru, then Langford and I'd imagine we'd look at Armstrong at 9 but I'm not sold on Armstrong. So many of his goals are crumbing type goals and his kicking looks horrible just from his highlights. Seems to helicopter so many goals. But that's just me, I could be wrong. I've heard he's a great contested mark but not many of his highlights show his great contested marks. There's many more contested mark highlights in Tauru's.
I'm just not seeing the NM pick split happening in the end despite all the talk.
If Richmond offer 6+18 for 2 is that worth it for North Melbourne? Surely North would rather just ensure they get who they want (even if they are reaching for somebody), as opposed to hoping in exchange for an extra pick that'll be in the 20s after bids.
On the flipside I don't see how Richmond could offer 6+10/11. It's too much. As much as they would like the top 2 picks, they can get another gun mid prospect at 6 plus add a KPP at 10/11 which is surely smarter early in a rebuild. Reid/Smillie + Tauru/Armstrong/Trainor > Smith/FOS/Lalor.
Saints and Dees would want something substantial back from North to part with both top 10 picks. I'm not sure North would be keen on that. If they were willing to swap both top 10s for pick 2, I imagine they would have gone harder at WC pick 3.
The draft numbers don't matter now, if North move from 2 to 6 it's because they believe the guy they want will be there at 6. They get 18 as a bonus.
10/11 or 18 doesn't really matter as they're making the move for a particular player. Sure they'd rather 11, getting the bloke you want at 6 and then having 18, it's still a good deal.
Yep, agreed.That's true but if they only get 18 they'd want to be 100% sure their man is there at 6. Not worth the risk if there is any doubt.
N Fing way are we drafting that dud from Essendon (still under contract) ...but if you were to say Sid Draper at pick 4...Could anyone see Richmond trading pick 6 & 10 (pick 7 & 13 here) for North’s pick 2 (3 here), assuming Rioli/Bolton get done. Richmond can take both Lalor and Jagga and North can take Tauru (who they seem keen on but pick 2 might be a little high) and best available. Who says no here?
- Richmond - Sam Lalor
- Brisbane (Bid) - Levi Ashcroft
- Richmond - Jagga Smith
- Carlton - Finn O’Sullivan
- Adelaide - Sam Draper
- Melbourne - Murphy Reid
- North - Alix Tauru
- Essendon (Bid) - Isaac Kako
- St Kilda - Harvey Langford
- St Kilda - Josh Smillie
- Gold Coast (Bid) - Leo Lombard
- Melbourne - Harry Armstrong
- North - Tobie Travaglia/best fit
What's the feeling over your way banzai - trade for pick 2 or not? And if so, what gets it done?
I'd hope not considering we are in a win-win spot at 4! Will get 1 of Smith, Lalor, FOS or Draper. I'd be happy with any of them tbhWonder if Adelaide would bid for #3 if that happens....????
I think Melbourne may look to split pick 9 to a team like Richmond who have so many picks but may want to come up the order simply because they can.I don’t see Melbourne passing on Langford, Draper or Smith if they are available at 5. Seems to be a gap between top 5 mids and next group for me. I think more likely they will go KPP at 9.
Similar reason to why I think North takes FOS or Langford at 2 if we don’t trade back.
I think Melbourne are elite at climbing to the top of the draft and getting who they targeted. No way I can see your team dropping back - just not your modus operendi. Honestly - you have one of the best in class at negotiating up to elite picks at the pointy end of the draft.I think Melbourne may look to split pick 9 to a team like Richmond who have so many picks but may want to come up the order simply because they can.
agreed but I think this would be a dumb draft to trade up in. If we trade up, we'd have to trade 5+9 which I can't see happening or moreso it can't be north melbourne because they don't have a good enough 2nd pick to give back to us. And either do Carlton.I think Melbourne are elite at climbing to the top of the draft and getting who they targeted. No way I can see your team dropping back - just not your modus operendi. Honestly - you have one of the best in class at negotiating up to elite picks at the pointy end of the draft.
Given we have 10 and 11 I don't like your chances.I think Melbourne may look to split pick 9 to a team like Richmond who have so many picks but may want to come up the order simply because they can.