List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

[bedford]

So we’ve ruled out it being Lloyd, McCartin, Warner, Sheldrick, Papley, Florent and McDonald

Who’s left?

Wrong

 

[Bloods86]

Wrong

Either you've said No, or they aren't the younger brother.

The only one is Lloyd, where you said No after someone asked, but you could have been saying No about something else.

Or Warner.

 

[Wheresbuddy]

Either you've said No, or they aren't the younger brother.

The only one is Lloyd, where you said No after someone asked, but you could have been saying No about something else.

He's playing this week

 

[Bloods86]

Well it has to be Warner then, or Bedders is misleading us or wrong on something.

 

[TheMase]

Either you've said No, or they aren't the younger brother.

The only one is Lloyd, where you said No after someone asked, but you could have been saying No about something else.

Or Warner.

I don’t believe he said no to McCartin and he loved my post. So he either loved it because McCartin is correct, or he agrees with my VFL assessment

 

[Cadsky]

Charlie’s older than Tom

But younger than paddy.

 

[Tedeski]

McCartin for sure.

 

[Bloods86]

But younger than paddy.

Paddy isn't a player for us

 

[Cadsky]

Paddy isn't a player for us

Was. It's pretty obvious he's talking about Charlie.

 

[Bloods86]

Was. It's pretty obvious he's talking about Charlie.

Bedders loves correcting even minor spelling mistakes, I'm sure he was being precise. If he meant ex-player surely he would have said to avoid confusion and not waste peoples time.

 

[bedford]

Bedders loves correcting even minor spelling mistakes, I'm sure he was being precise. If he meant ex-player surely he would have said to avoid confusion and not waste peoples time.

I'm as bad as anyonE spelling , it's when people uSe yank spelling

 

[TheMase]

Charlie’s older than Tom

I know? I didn’t say anything about age at all or who was younger or older…??

And Bedford never said it either:
“Take it to the bank a brother of a player has been put away from all footy for the season and we will add him”

 

[Bloods86]

In any case, I'd have thought Lloyd is the one worth considering. Charlie seems a long shot.

 

[Bloods86]

I know? I didn’t say anything about age at all or who was younger or older…??

And Bedford never said it either:
“Take it to the bank a brother of a player has been put away from all footy for the season and we will add him”

He edited his post to remove "younger"

 

[TheMase]

In any case, I'd have thought Lloyd is the one worth considering. Charlie seems a long shot.

I definitely agree

 

[TheMase]

He edited his post to remove "younger"

Ah thanks makes sense.
Was obviously an error

 

[hairy biker]

It never ceases to amaze me that people keep falling for bedford's crap.

Just a reminder from earlier in the season (June);

Has anyone heard if Charlie McCartin is going to stay on for a few more games, or the rest of the season?

Ill ask his manager tonight

Will only play for us .

Charlie hasn't been sighted for us since and has been back playing at Lorne.
So we have bedford's source, a player manager who didn't know where his client was playing in the following weeks.

Let's not forget all the other 'take it to the bank(s)' eg if Logan signed we couldn't afford Hayward, we were 'right into' Jordon Sweet, who two days later lodged a request for a trade to Port (at the same time Grundy requested a trade to Sydney).

And this same source has also all the news on Papley's injury, which just happens to fully coincide with the Swans injury news put out earlier in the week.

Now eventually bedford's source will actually get one right, but the amount of weight put on these rumours is IMO absolutely ridiculous.

 

[ashep]

Ah thanks mates sense.
Was obviously an error

Certain to be acknowledged any moment...

 

[bedford]

Ah thanks mates sense.
Was obviously an error

I do make many

 

[Bandicoot]

With the success of our first round selections over the past number of years, I'd suggest we trade it for whatever we can get for it.

 

[bedford]

It never ceases to amaze me that people keep falling for bedford's crap.

Just a reminder from earlier in the season (June);






Charlie hasn't been sighted for us since and has been back playing at Lorne.
So we have bedford's source, a player manager who didn't know where his client was playing in the following weeks.

Let's not forget all the other 'take it to the bank(s)' eg if Logan signed we couldn't afford Hayward, we were 'right into' Jordon Sweet, who two days later lodged a request for a trade to Port (at the same time Grundy requested a trade to Sydney).

And this same source has also all the news on Papley's injury, which just happens to fully coincide with the Swans injury news put out earlier in the week.

Now eventually bedford's source will actually get one right, but the amount of weight put on these rumours is IMO absolutely ridiculous.

Fantastic post well done . Sometimes mistakes are made by anyone . Logans contract was put back due to the size of Wills contract and we had to juggle the books , hence as KB said we won't be chasing any big fish this year.
Hopefully going forward you can contribute something meaningful to the debate and not crap as you say .

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Least Bedford winning the gold medal will be fun after not loving the thread hehe

 

[rustycrate]

Least Bedford winning the gold medal will be fun after not loving the thread hehe

I thought Bedford wanted this thread to be locked until after the GF. Why is he posting in this thread now?

 

[LukeParkerno1]

I thought Bedford wanted this thread to be locked until after the GF. Why is he posting in this thread now?

Secret love of this thread

 

[bedford]

I thought Bedford wanted this thread to be locked until after the GF. Why is he posting in this thread now?

F'd if i know , just encouraging LP1 for the Gold. My apologies Rusty , probably bored as well and it's not as over the top as in previous years