-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals
- Thread starter hairy biker
- Start date
- Tagged users None
TheGoatBaron
Bigfooty’s Head Shake Officer
- Jan 4, 2010
- 18,087
- 9,189
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Port Melb, Eintracht Frankfurt.
Probably because we are disparate for a big bodied in & under contested beast and the toughest one we had is now walking to North because he was either used as a fwd or not played.
Pick #40 would be quite ironic. We drafted him with that pick to begin with.
He showed he could impact in smaller bursts in the midfield and was a goal threat in some matches, but was off the pace of the game much of the time.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Just happy we won't ridiculously offer some heinous overs for Frost
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,227
- 2,096
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Yep and we love to draft players in the 30s and 40s so hopefully we get a good one
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Just wonder whether it is possible to get a second from North. Now they have 22, we aint getting that okay, but lets say they can split 22 with GC and we can get a pick in the late 20's or 30's that would be perfect. Means North still keep a second too
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,227
- 2,096
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Actually thinking about it but if we could get F3 and F4 that might be more valuable for Parker. Thats because that F4 would come rocketing in with all the bid matching and would potentially end up coming in from #60 or so into like #45 or so
F3 is effectively the equivalent of current 40 with North, within 5 picks anyway.
Any future 3rd or 4th round picks we have are to be swallowed up by academy matching next year, so that's the reason we'd get them, not to use them earlier than the position suggests.
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,227
- 2,096
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Thats what i meant is that with the projected 10+ matchable players in the top end of the 2025 draft the pick will become valuable to match our 3 academy boys
- Oct 10, 2012
- 2,331
- 2,688
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I suspect we will get future pic that has points attached to help with 2025 academy. We will only draft 3 or 4 players this year and I expect 2 to be academy rookies so that just leaves 17 & 19 as only live picks.
Rana_swans
Debutant
I think we trade/delist:
Parker
Ladhams
Konstanty
McAndrew
One of Arnold/Francis (looks like Arnold)
Vickery (less preferable Magor)
So that's 6 spots, with Hanily from the MSD just taking Reid's spot.
Another pick inside the top 40 would be nice. Take 3 or 4 at the ND, 1 or 2 rookies, at least 5 players and maybe leave an SSP spot open.
I love Tom but every time the ball comes into the backline I see someone who is in a blind panic running into our other defenders and giving up goals.
He should be moved forward, which is where he started and where we have a screaming need for a mobile forward who can take a contested mark and kick straight. He needs to be reinvented. Allows for certain players to have a run in the 2s to hone their skills when they don't deliver in the 1s.
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,227
- 2,096
- AFL Club
- Sydney
So we are now moving our best KPD up forward? Why?
He's ranked 16 on RookieMe....not that I'd have any idea but that's a fair distance from top 3 in what is apparently the best draft in ages. Looks good for a pick at 13 if our imaginary Warner trade this year plays out that way....
Post GF psychosis.
Because he's no longer our best KPD. He's been piss poor in comparison to his usual standard. His strength used to be his timing but now all he does is get caught behind or under the ball, and running into teammates. I have never felt more assured a half decent opposition ball would end up in a mark to his direct opponent.
Melican has gone past him. Ideally we need someone better than Melican in addition these two. Would be happy to tolerate mccartin as the 3rd defender. Otherwise I would be more than happy to try him as a forward because Amartey gives me the shits.
Reports Tim Kelly with a year to run has had clubs enquiring. 31.
Would pick 3 and Tim Kelly be enough for Warner?
Swans get a plug and play replacement mid / half forward who can rack it up. Very good centre clearance mid.
Plus get a crack at a top 4 mid with pick 3 for the long term list profile / balance.
Would that be close?
Would pick 3 and Tim Kelly be enough for Warner?
Swans get a plug and play replacement mid / half forward who can rack it up. Very good centre clearance mid.
Plus get a crack at a top 4 mid with pick 3 for the long term list profile / balance.
Would that be close?
Benmacca33
Senior List
- Aug 27, 2019
- 183
- 255
- AFL Club
- Sydney
And Warner goes to west coast so we don’t have to see him run around and win a flag anytime soon
Better than going to freo
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
He will go way before that and RookieMe is a shocker for rankings especially defenders
SwansLifer
Senior List
- Aug 29, 2024
- 241
- 323
- AFL Club
- Sydney
So a guy that wants to go to WA for a guy that would want to go back to WA...again? Nah we good.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
How quickly do you want no? Just no. Pick 3 plus the Hawks 1 this year (Barass trade). Surely that’s more than fair. Has to be the equivalent of two firsts this year (whether it be those two or your f1 but I’ll assume you wish to keep your f1) most Swans fans would be beyond annoyed if if just pick 3 and a bloke that would last a year before wanting to go home again.
Honestly, I'd take that.
