List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

[Ticky009]

 

[Tomorrow]

Geez that is one helluva pitch.

I couldn't pick the kid out of a line-up and I'd sign him right now.

He's not flash but always in the trenches fighting alongside. A welcome change from our last 2, 141 point gf slaughters.

VFL Showreel, R16: Dom Brew highlights

Enjoy Dom Brew's standout VFL performance for Werribee

www.google.com

 

[The King!]

Good luck to opposition finding a matchup for Blakey. He will cause nightmares. The confusion alone caused by his wheels due to opposition needing constant handovers for him.

We should be able to force favourable matchups and loose players with his presence up there

Is there a new Blakey?

 

[The King!]

North can at least start at a pick in the 40s.

This isn't a garage sale.

 

[giantsully]

Pick 62, not unexpected.

What's a little unexpected is us playing hard ball. Thought this would be a formality.

 

[hairy biker]

What's a little unexpected is us playing hard ball. Thought this would be a formality.

The Parker/Swans marriage has reached its natural conclusion.
No animosity, Both sides amenable to moving on.

But pick 62 is basically Luke's new partner giving us the finger.

I assume their strategy is start low, (and in different circumstances WCE were happy to take pick in the 60s for Darling) but why make what should be a relatively straightforward trade complicated, in any sense?

Pick 44 (as it currently stands) seems to me to be a fair price.

 

[BloodySwan]

The Parker/Swans marriage has reached its natural conclusion.
No animosity, Both sides amenable to moving on.

But pick 62 is basically Luke's new partner giving us the finger.

I assume their strategy is start low, but why make what should be a relatively straightforward trade complicated, in any sense?

Pick 44 (as it currently stands) seems to me to be a fair price.

I think we still see ourselves in the premiership window, losing Parker weakens where we are.

He might not be the first picked for the middle, however he is important to our 22.

North see Parker providing them value for the next 3 seasons, pick 62 doesn't reflect what he means to us or North

 

[Millky95]

Beat 22 and played in a GF side and cintracted

Pick 2 or **** off

 

[The King!]

I think it will be who blinks, Sydney at the end of the day have basically publicly farewelled Parker - yes they could go back on it, but would want to do the right thing for him at this stage.

North have said we think you have 3 more years and we want you, so they need to make it happen too

 

[Roadrunner]

Will split pick 44 to Richmond for pick 51 and 61. Just give pick 61 to the Swan for Parker. Job done

 

[The King!]

Will split pick 44 to Richmond for pick 51 and 61. Just give pick 61 to the Swan for Parker.

Yeah 62 was a no but 61 is just right

 

[Membling]

Richmond’s initial asking price earlier this week for Daniel Rioli wasn’t just pick 6. It was also pick 13.Details.

Wowzers this is what happens when you are considered soft in the trading stacks.

If GCS pay that they can fold

That is just deluded.

If I was GC would walk. Better value elsewhere

 

[Andyjh]

Will split pick 44 to Richmond for pick 51 and 61. Just give pick 61 to the Swan for Parker. Job done

Who let this douche in here?

 

[bedford]

Will split pick 44 to Richmond for pick 51 and 61. Just give pick 61 to the Swan for Parker. Job done

I'm back , JOG ON

 

[Heeney2Franklin]

That is just deluded.

If I was GC would walk. Better value elsewhere

My god the value of Chad should be 3x top 10 picks based on that

 

[FreeAgent1]

north need 25 for Caleb Daniel

35

Caleb Daniel

Age

28

Ht

171cm

Wt

72kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

21.3

5star

K

11.5

4star

HB

9.8

5star

M

3.5

4star

T

2.9

4star

CL

1.4

4star

D

19.5

4star

K

11.1

4star

HB

8.4

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

2.0

3star

CL

1.0

3star

D

16.4

4star

K

7.2

3star

HB

9.2

5star

M

3.4

4star

T

2.6

4star

CL

0.2

2star

who I expect will nominate them.

Therefor I think the final trade will be:
44 + future 3rd for future 4th + Parker

Gives us 44 this year and helps with points for next year.

I actually think when all the academy bids come in 44will be mid 30s

 

[Tedeski]

Just spoke to same source , same who gave me info on partner

They want to sign Warner for 1 year when he gets back from holiday. They have pumped up money and are pumping him up same time. ( loves the pumping up apparently lol) they think will get it done. Premiership window. Thibk we are chance next 2

Garcia went through the club but we said no due to asking price money wise.

We still need Parker of books for things to happen next year.

Harley and horse when back are doing a full review on the game , apparently will be putting players on the spot more so.

Harley the one pushing this , not acceptable by the club

Nice Punts.

 

[Kbroome]

north need 25 for Caleb Daniel who I expect will nominate them.

Therefor I think the final trade will be:
44 + future 3rd for future 4th + Parker

Gives us 44 this year and helps with points for next year.

I actually think when all the academy bids come in 44will be mid 30s

44 won't be mid 30s sadly because half of the picks used for academy matching will be 45-50, especially given the Richmond trade for 20. Still 44 will atleast hold its ground but it could depend on how Essendon get picks for Kako bid

 

[LukeParkerno1]

That is just deluded.

If I was GC would walk. Better value elsewhere

On the positive still a better deal than the Bowes deal lol

 

[FreeAgent1]

44 won't be mid 30s sadly because half of the picks used for academy matching will be 45-50, especially given the Richmond trade for 20. Still 44 will atleast hold its ground but it could depend on how Essendon get picks for Kako bid

I didn’t think brissy or GC have enough list spots to attach to points that worthless…

 

[Bloods86]

Will split pick 44 to Richmond for pick 51 and 61. Just give pick 61 to the Swan for Parker. Job done

Go meep yourself.

 

[Kbroome]

I didn’t think brissy or GC have enough list spots to attach to points that worthless…

Still under the old draft index and Brissie will delist 2-3 more to open up the spots to take the 3 pick combo of 40s selections for pick 20. They will go into deficit but it depends by how much. GC will do it easily tbh we just don't know which picks will end up not being used on Rioli/Noble and trading away 13 for what

 

[Bloods86]

For those wanting small forwards, there's a couple that might go a bit later than the ones that usually appear on the top 30 rankings. Personally I'd be going with players we already have, or a rookie pick, but if we do...

- Jasper Alger, Oakleigh, 182cm, 4th in 20m sprint, 10th in agility at combine, 18 in December (so on the younger side of the draft), rated 30-40 by Twomey in July (see below), 3 goals vs SA, 2 vs WA in champs

Cal Twomey's Phantom Form Guide July extra: The 10 next best

AFL.com.au's draft guru Cal Twomey looks at the players who were unlucky to miss being in July's Phantom Form Guide

www.afl.com.au

Nicholls (KPF) and O'Farrell (KPD) are other tall options mentioned here if our picks are in the mid 20s.

- Cody Angove, 182cm, Claremont - any info Dubai Quacker (apologies if you've already mentioned)? Looks impressive with his effort and some decent delivery (to where the player will be, even if he made the players work for it).

 

[Shaq_01]

If we can move up to 13 or higher

I would love Alex T or Armstrong

Alex T would be great cause I think he could step right into the swans and replace Rampe kinda like a AJ

I put him ahead of Armstrong

Because there are a few other quality forwards in the 20s and 30s like a Gerryn who probably will go 30s

If we can move up to p13 and nab another pick in the late 20s early 30s

We could get great KPD and KPF

Otherwise we could keep our current picks and if we can get another in the late 20s early 30s

We can pick up hybrid Forward KPF and KPD

 

[Shaq_01]

If cochranee can be developed into a running Utility or take over Blakey role and we give Blakey license to roam like Goodes use too

What would that do to our game especially if we nab Alex T and have him in the mix with rampe next year and without him after

We would have a pretty dynamic black 6 and Blakey roaming causing havoc

I have always liked what Geelong have done with Stanley and Essendon are trying to do with cox

I think we almost have all the personnel to pull it off especially if we can get bigger rampe replacement into the mix

 

[Adnico26Parker]

Here is the latest ESPN draft rankings (October):

AFL Draft: Bolters emerge as combine takes centre stage

One of the most important weekends on the junior footy calendar has been run and won, with standout performances littered across the combine making ESPN's draft board for October a little clearer.

www.espn.com.au