List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

[Ticky009]

 

[zyzzbruh]

In that case Gulden, Heeney & Warner seems pretty straight forward. A Gulden on each wing, Heeney playing forward, with 2 x Warner & Heeney at stoppages.

Which Gulden are you cloning? the one that runs hard defensively, or the one that doesn't?

 

[ScrewInStuds]

Which Gulden are you cloning? the one that runs hard defensively, or the one that doesn't?

I'm pretty sure Adam retired.

 

[Tedeski]

Can't say Jordan and Grundy weren't successful! We don't get Grundy and we are subjected to Ladhams as the ruck!

He should have been given more games to let Grundy rest up.

 

[Kiama Chris]

Or Darcy Fort

Can't teach 208cm with long arms.

 

[Heeney2Franklin]

Almost all the deals just got done

 

[Kiama Chris]

I think the club has more faith in our (tall) forwards than this board.

More about risk management I think.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

He should have been given more games to let Grundy rest up.

Agree there that’s on Horse who was terrible in the back half a season

 

[Heeney2Franklin]

Callum Twomey

@CalTwomey

Houston to Pies, Noble to Suns, Lukosius to Port, Atkins to Port, Richards to Port. All done.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

What an awful trade by Port and yet expected with those mugs keeping Ken

 

[Tedeski]

Nothing's happening, so here's a question for folks.

If you could clone three current Swans players so there was two of them in the side, who would you choose?

Papley, Amartey & Hayward so that we don't go anywhere near another GF we have no right to be in.

 

[RedBloodBlackSwan]

Nothing's happening, so here's a question for folks.

If you could clone three current Swans players so there was two of them in the side, who would you choose?

I think you need to do your research on cloning. Cloning could never turn 3 players into 2. It would just make more of them.

And with that grammar joke, I will see my way out…



Okay, so I would to with:

1. Heeney (mid plus forward)
2. Mills (mid plus defender)
3. Melican (two KPDs)

 

[Jewelsbon]

Nothing's happening, so here's a question for folks.

If you could clone three current Swans players so there was two of them in the side, who would you choose?

Heeney, Rowie, Papley

 

[rustycrate]

I reckon the Caleb Daniel

35

Caleb Daniel

Age

28

Ht

171cm

Wt

72kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

21.3

5star

K

11.5

4star

HB

9.8

5star

M

3.5

4star

T

2.9

4star

CL

1.4

4star

D

19.5

4star

K

11.1

4star

HB

8.4

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

2.0

3star

CL

1.0

3star

D

16.4

4star

K

7.2

3star

HB

9.2

5star

M

3.4

4star

T

2.6

4star

CL

0.2

2star

to North is holding up the Parker deal.
Hope it does not happen.

 

[Bloods86]

Which Gulden are you cloning? the one that runs hard defensively, or the one that doesn't?

Warner too.

I think one is enough. Though you could throw the extra Gulden into a forward pocket.

 

[Superstar swan]

We need Parker to go to get our offer to Warner in the same ball park

 

[LukeParkerno1]

I reckon the Caleb Daniel to North is holding up the Parker deal.
Hope it does not happen.

Doubt it has no influence on the picks

 

[Tedeski]

Which Gulden are you cloning? the one that runs hard defensively, or the one that doesn't?

Not the one that fails against the top teams.

 

[Kiama Chris]

Just as they are now I guess.

Tricky.
Melican - I want another lockdown so McCartin can intercept and we are safer from injury.
Heeney - Mid 100% tog and forward. Lose a tall maybe.
Papley - get the energy going up front.
Thought long and hard about Grundy for 50% tog each.

 

[Olian]

Cornes is excited about the Port SANFL chances

 

[rustycrate]

Doubt it has no influence on the picks

What are North using then? Players?

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Do GC have an indoor meeting on how we can bend over for a club each trade period? Just fold them

That’s the deal for Houston lol

Not sure who is worse GC or Port accepting it

 

[LukeParkerno1]

What are North using then? Players?

Pick 44 is where parker lands do I agree with it no but Daniel won’t get traded anyway. North take 2&25 to the pick swap area. Rich trade with North for pick 2 imo

 

[Bandicoot]

The reason for his slide is because of concussion issues? Not sure that's true.

To the best of my knowledge, he went into concussion protocols once (as do most players from time-to-time). I don't think (?) he's had a history of concussions.

Maybe there's more to it - but I thought the "slide" has been more about him being a defender, not a mid or key forward.

I did not assert that Trainor isn't a risk. All draftees are a risk. But a prodigiously talented early draft pick is a better chance of becoming a quality AFL player than late or rookie draftees.

Not when we're doing the picking.

 

[caesar88]

Warner too.

I think one is enough. Though you could throw the extra Gulden into a forward pocket.

Yeah I have no idea why Gulden cops it for his lapses in effort so disproportionately to Warner. One is a far greater offender than the other.

Because Gulden's lapses are exactly that - lapses. Uncharacteristic sloppy moments during games where he is otherwise busting his absolute arse consistently. Warner is just lazy, and you can cite examples of it all throughout matches.

Granted, Gulden's got things he still needs to work on. I'd still like to see more selfless footy from him, and the berating of teammates needs to be put in the cooler ASAP. But he's an incredibly hard-working player and it's unfair that when he has those lapses they are highlighted as so disastrous, yet because everyone just expects it from Warner, they go unscrutinised.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Only Port could waste everyone time for pick 50 and still take that putrid deal