Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
113 in a day , unbelievable , is 1500 a chance
I have to believe that if Warner's situation is as simple as $X gets it done, it will get done by hook or by crook. We'll free up the money somewhere.We need Parker to go to get our offer to Warner in the same ball park
I have to believe that if Warner's situation is as simple as $X gets it done, it will get done by hook or by crook. We'll free up the money somewhere.
I don't understand much of that.Pick 44 is where parker lands do I agree with it no but Daniel won’t get traded anyway. North take 2&25 to the pick swap area. Rich trade with North for pick 2 imo
If you value Lukosius at #18 and Richards at 40 then Port effectively got #18 and #12 out of Houston, thats a pretty good deal for what they wanted.Do GC have an indoor meeting on how we can bend over for a club each trade period? Just fold them
That’s the deal for Houston lol
Not sure who is worse GC or Port accepting it
Could be both finishing out of the 8.If you value Lukosius at #18 and Richards at 40 then Port effectively got #18 and #12 out of Houston, thats a pretty good deal for what they wanted.
All GCS need is for one of Port or Collingwood to miss the 8 and then this deal strikes gold for them
Win Win.Could be both finishing out of the 8.
And thats how GCS win their trades because they bet on you being shit and then suddenly next year they will have 2 or potentially 3 top 10 picks and then they recycle the process againCould be both finishing out of the 8.
If you value Lukosius at #18 and Richards at 40 then Port effectively got #18 and #12 out of Houston, thats a pretty good deal for what they wanted.
All GCS need is for one of Port or Collingwood to miss the 8 and then this deal strikes gold for them
I don't understand much of that.
Daniel apparently wants to move to North. North have to pay something. I expect picks are involved. Therefore I reckon North will prioritise a player on a four year deal at a younger age than an older player on a 3 year deal.
Picks have to be involved. Therefore/conclusion = Daniel might be prioritized higher than Parker.
Therefore/conclusion the Daniel deal might be holding up the Parker deal.
I'd also take clones of Lloyd just for the opportunity for a few Lloyd chains and BT to pass out in the box out of breath.Nothing's happening, so here's a question for folks.
If you could clone three current Swans players so there was two of them in the side, who would you choose?
So GCS is a betting agency.And thats how GCS win their trades because they bet on you being shit and then suddenly next year they will have 2 or potentially 3 top 10 picks and then they recycle the process again
So GCS is a betting agency.
Not interested in winning flags or making the the eight.
More interested in winning the 888 and making flags.
Can only have one of each!I'd also take clones of Lloyd just for the opportunity for a few Lloyd chains and BT to pass out in the box out of breath.
That was never stated.Can only have one of each!
Still works if there's 2 Lloyds and they're chipping it back and forth late.Can only have one of each!
He is a very good one to be fair and GC don’t need 6, they get Lombard for zilch.
Yes to a certain extent. They are now just waiting for their GCS academy graduates to get good. I believe they will make finals in the next 2-3 years just need to wait because once they start making finals it will be tough for them to fall down given how strong their academy isSo GCS is a betting agency.
Not interested in winning flags or making the the eight.
More interested in flagging and winning the 888.
Collingwood effectively paid #11 and their F1 for Houston.
I know people will go on about the F1 not mattering because of their F/S but what if they collapse and finish bottom 4. I'm pretty sure that they can get a better deal out of trading it away in the future than now.That future F1 will be ladder pending much deathriding to do
Never have I seen the Swans pay 2 first rounders for a player. Is that a reason we usually make the eight and don't bottom out much. Two first rounders in a draft that is very even from pick one through 10ish. Wasting picks. Great stuff. Go beat yourselves up.Collingwood effectively paid #11 and their F1 for Houston.
In any case, one trade period doesn't define them.Just wondering if the Swans' recruiting team have turned up for trade week?
Maybe:
1. They're satisfied with the current list, or
2. Paying close to the maximum of the salary cap and have no funds for any new established recruits?
Either way, what a disappointing period it has been so far!