List Mgmt. 2024 GWS Giants List Management - Academy, Free Agent, Trade & Draft

[Giant Strides]

I have the same sentiments as I had with HH. Would like to keep him as a local lad and academy grad, but the benefit of those aspects needs to be keeping him for less $$$ than he can get elsewhere. Both are role players rather than stars. I won't say that you can find anyone to fill their roles, but it should not be to the price being offered by other clubs.

I can understand that he's torn, and I will understand if he leaves for the $$$. It would be hard to knock that much back.

 

[GWS Goose]

He's not worth that $$$ to us.

Sucks, but I reckon our current offer is right, and the rest is now on him.

He is not worth the $800+ others are offering, but he is worth the $650k we are.

 

[Capital hawk]

Swans in the race will come down to what Warner decides as well

Love to know how the Swans would fit him in their salary cap !

 

[Giant Strides]

Love to know how the Swans would fit him in their salary cap !

 

[PaythePerryman]

A wild Fonti appearing has definitely dampened the blow of potentially losing Perryman.
But will we lose Cumming as well? More importantly....we can't overpay for a guy doing 600 soft tissues injuries and playing on a wing. Thought he had a great few games but just isn't the type of player you throw the cheque book at.
I'd prefer to keep Perryman over Cumming but the price is WAY overs.

 

[JC100]

A wild Fonti appearing has definitely dampened the blow of potentially losing Perryman.
But will we lose Cumming as well? More importantly....we can't overpay for a guy doing 600 soft tissues injuries and playing on a wing. Thought he had a great few games but just isn't the type of player you throw the cheque book at.
I'd prefer to keep Perryman over Cumming but the price is WAY overs.

It’s not the players as such but more so the experience we lose if they leave. In fahey, Fonti and stone think we have Pez covered and through the midfield we have Leake, Wehr and Angwin plus the small forwards who can move up the ground with Gothard coming in. But all makes a relatively inexperienced side more inexperienced

 

[Giant Pete]

It’s not the players as such but more so the experience we lose if they leave. In fahey, Fonti and stone think we have Pez covered and through the midfield we have Leake, Wehr and Angwin plus the small forwards who can move up the ground with Gothard coming in. But all makes a relatively inexperienced side more inexperienced

We need a 200cm plus ruck forward.
We also need a couple of quality mids.

 

[Giant Strides]

We need a 200cm plus ruck forward.

Not 200cm, but almost. (199cm)

I like the look of this guy ...

I remember when we were interested in Luke Jackson, so I wonder if Kayle Gerreyn would get any interest from us. He's meant to be rated in the 20s or 30s, depending on which draft watcher ... but he might go earlier if a club sees a need. Melbourne for example.

This game (WAFL Colts) he had 30 HOs, 30 disposals & 2 goals.

 

[Giant Strides]

We also need a couple of quality mids.

Have you looked at any of the U18 of CTL games to have any idea of the mids that catch your eye?

 

[captainMyCaptain]

Safe to say we won't move on dollars with Perrynan. But given he won't be 26 until December and our last offer was 6 years, could see us upping the offer to. 7 years if we rate his leadership as much as Spike did when he was the caretaker coach.

 

[Danny88]

We need a 200cm plus ruck forward.
We also need a couple of quality mids.

Who doesn’t play for that 200cm ruck forward out of interest

 

[Colonial]

New deal on table for Crow, Lion eyes 14th season, flag Pie signs

Check out all the latest trade news from around the League

www.afl.com.au

Thomas extends a year, We want Ward to stick around, he is unsure, Elliott is also not as all for the Giants as last season.

Of course it could be all just bull.

 

[MelbourneGWS]

Fox has listed us as one of the (many) possible suitors for Clayton Oliver

13

Clayton Oliver

Age

27

Ht

189cm

Wt

88kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

27.8

5star

K

9.5

4star

HB

18.4

5star

M

3.2

3star

T

6.3

5star

CL

6.3

5star

D

25.1

5star

K

11.1

4star

HB

14.0

5star

M

3.6

4star

T

5.6

5star

CL

5.9

5star

D

19.2

5star

K

4.6

2star

HB

14.6

5star

M

2.0

3star

T

4.4

5star

CL

3.8

5star

- Melbourne will pay a (significant?) portion of his $1million salary

GWS might be another to assess the potential upside of acquiring Oliver in order to further bolster its list. Despite the likelihood that the Giants are storming to another finals berth, they haven’t quite been the same side in the second half of the year as they were in the first. Possibly a byproduct of that is Tom Green

12

Tom Green

Age

23

Ht

192cm

Wt

92kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

11.5

3star

K

4.3

2star

HB

7.3

5star

M

1.8

2star

T

2.3

4star

CL

2.8

4star

D

11.5

3star

K

4.3

2star

HB

7.3

4star

M

1.8

2star

T

2.3

3star

CL

2.8

4star

D

11.5

3star

K

4.3

2star

HB

7.3

5star

M

1.8

2star

T

2.3

4star

CL

2.8

5star

probably not performing to his typical lofty standards. GWS surely would have hoped Finn Callaghan was set to become an inside ball-getter, however he still seems a player more likely to do serious damage on the outside. Picks 14, 34, 52, 55 and 70 gives GWS some wriggle room on the trade table

Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained

Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained

www.foxsports.com.au

 

[3207]

Fox has listed us as one of the (many) possible suitors for Clayton Oliver - Melbourne will pay a (significant?) portion of his $1million salary

GWS might be another to assess the potential upside of acquiring Oliver in order to further bolster its list. Despite the likelihood that the Giants are storming to another finals berth, they haven’t quite been the same side in the second half of the year as they were in the first. Possibly a byproduct of that is Tom Green probably not performing to his typical lofty standards. GWS surely would have hoped Finn Callaghan was set to become an inside ball-getter, however he still seems a player more likely to do serious damage on the outside. Picks 14, 34, 52, 55 and 70 gives GWS some wriggle room on the trade table

Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained

Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained

www.foxsports.com.au

Trust me when I say this:

Clarry ain’t going anywhere.

Especially to us.

Not happening.

We would have gotten one Dees premiership player (no longer at Dees) had Yze been announced our coach but none of that core would consider a move to us.

Not happening.

At all.

 

[3207]

Fox has listed us as one of the (many) possible suitors for Clayton Oliver - Melbourne will pay a (significant?) portion of his $1million salary

GWS might be another to assess the potential upside of acquiring Oliver in order to further bolster its list. Despite the likelihood that the Giants are storming to another finals berth, they haven’t quite been the same side in the second half of the year as they were in the first. Possibly a byproduct of that is Tom Green probably not performing to his typical lofty standards. GWS surely would have hoped Finn Callaghan was set to become an inside ball-getter, however he still seems a player more likely to do serious damage on the outside. Picks 14, 34, 52, 55 and 70 gives GWS some wriggle room on the trade table

Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained

Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained

www.foxsports.com.au

I didn’t read the article prior to my first comment. Having read it this phrase sticks out:

“There’s frustration and tension building between the two parties — Clayton Oliver is frustrated about lately starting on the bench, this new role that he’s been given — he doesn’t think he’s being utilised the best way he can be”

So; a bloke with the worst (unwarranted) reputation in league footy in years is somehow now a competitive beast that doesn’t want to be benched?

What is it?

Is he a useless drug dependant dead beat or his he a fierce competitor who doesn’t want to benched?

Media and fans can’t have it both ways.

Pick a side and flipping stick to it.

Fk I hate the media

 

[Orange Agent]

Can understand the EH angle, from his perspective, who's spot does he take? At his age he can't really afford to spend 12 months to break into a regular spot. Not sure Ward has another season and don't really want to see him end up in role Keefe is playing this year.

 

[Colonial]

Can understand the EH angle, from his perspective, who's spot does he take? At his age he can't really afford to spend 12 months to break into a regular spot. Not sure Ward has another season and don't really want to see him end up in role Keefe is playing this year.

Think we could use the Keefe style of player. Think EH would fill that role nicely.
Ward will always be needed. His leadership and knowledge developing and helping the next batch of Giants would be beneficial.

 

[Giant Strides]

Think we could use the Keefe style of player. Think EH would fill that role nicely.
Ward will always be needed. His leadership and knowledge developing and helping the next batch of Giants would be beneficial.

We want him as a backup utility; he wants to play first grade. I can see why he might have changed his mind to come to GWS.

 

[Colonial]

We want him as a backup utility; he wants to play first grade. I can see why he might have changed his mind to come to GWS.

Don’t think it’s a backup. Think we are struggling for players who just are about the hard work.
A Keefe like is needed.

 

[captainMyCaptain]

I didn’t read the article prior to my first comment. Having read it this phrase sticks out:

“There’s frustration and tension building between the two parties — Clayton Oliver is frustrated about lately starting on the bench, this new role that he’s been given — he doesn’t think he’s being utilised the best way he can be”

So; a bloke with the worst (unwarranted) reputation in league footy in years is somehow now a competitive beast that doesn’t want to be benched?

What is it?

Is he a useless drug dependant dead beat or his he a fierce competitor who doesn’t want to benched?

Media and fans can’t have it both ways.

Pick a side and flipping stick to it.

Fk I hate the media

Clearly the master plan is for him to join Freo for 2 years and once that's a disaster we pick him up for a 4th rounder, and he moves into Mummy's granny flat.

 

[PaythePerryman]

Don’t think it’s a backup. Think we are struggling for players who just are about the hard work.
A Keefe like is needed.

Well he adds to the list of Cadman, Riccardi and Gruz. I don't think he is getting in front of any of those guys.
The forward/ruck position requires being a good forward...more so than a good ruck

 

[Giant Pete]

Don’t think we should go after Oliver.

 

[JC100]

If Oliver was available and wanted to come to us without a big hit to the salary cap we should jump at it and back ourselves in.

Look at what being in Sydney has done for Hogan. Instantly makes us a better side

 

[Orange crush]

If Oliver was available and wanted to come to us without a big hit to the salary cap we should jump at it and back ourselves in.

Look at what being in Sydney has done for Hogan. Instantly makes us a better side

Double ninja power

 

[dlanod]

We want him as a backup utility; he wants to play first grade. I can see why he might have changed his mind to come to GWS.

Last year that was the plan and everyone was happy with it since he was languishing in reserves at Adelaide and at least he's got his brother up here and family nearby.

This year he's... well, not cemented a senior spot, but at a minimum hasn't looked out of place in the AFL. So I can 100% see why coming up here as a reserve (and probably on a reserves pay scale) is no longer attractive. Before the options were "delisted" vs "GWS reserves", now it's "seniors somewhere, even at an average club" vs "GWS reserves" and most will take the former.