Going back to Elijah Hollands and his 1 year contract, does anyone find it slightly questionable that we reduced the length of his contract based on his court case?
Obviously he has talent, pontential and we wanted to bring him over, but to reduce the contract length possibly seems unnecessary?
i think (changing to 1 year) is astute by the Club. Ball entirely in his court in terms of risk and opportunity - next year/tenure now fully performance based in terms of output, and attitude. no doubt if he delivers on these, as i expect he will, hell be well looked after