The toilet or the picks?Allegedly.
3 firsts sounds terrible, but I think it entirely depends on what comes with Bolton.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The toilet or the picks?Allegedly.
They’d want to be paying all of it for three years.I don't think I could handle that. Maybe if they were paying 80% of his salary.
Yeah so why would we trade him before seeing how he comes back in the off season?That's why I'd trade him if he's not going to get in professional athlete shape. He's gun when he's fit, but he simply doesn't give himself the best chance of being fit. That needs to change now.
West coast. Water closet.The toilet or the picks?
3 firsts sounds terrible, but I think it entirely depends on what comes with Bolton.
We should be prepared to walk the **** away. In no world is any player worth three firstsThey’d want to be paying all of it for three years.
Would expect there’s something back, also don’t think it will come to that, just that we may be prepared to pay that.
Honestly even a fit Darcy for half a season is more value to us than Bolton at 3 firstsYeah so why would we trade him before seeing how he comes back in the off season?
Have you even known someone that tells you they're going to do the right thing over and over but never does? At some point you cut that person loose but for all you know the next time was the time they made the change. Always that risk.Yeah so why would we trade him before seeing how he comes back in the off season?
Well when that person has been available and played good consistent footy to a high level up until mid last year then and then had their whole pre season interrupted by multiple surgeries then you give them another chance.If we're getting 2nd round change and significant salary, I actually think it's palatable if and only if Chad is still on next year. But we'd want to be sure about that.
Have you even known someone that tells you they're going to do the right thing over and over but never does? At some point you cut that person loose but for all you know the next time was the time they made the change. Always that risk.
If we give three firsts, and get three seconds back, deep draft with clubs needing points, does that make it ok?If we're getting 2nd round change and significant salary, I actually think it's palatable if and only if Chad is still on next year. But we'd want to be sure about that.
Have you even known someone that tells you they're going to do the right thing over and over but never does? At some point you cut that person loose but for all you know the next time was the time they made the change. Always that risk.
the year before we waited until the end for CrowdenI'm not sure thats how its worked in previous years though, think some have known before they finished up
Maybe some ask for it earlier
edit: Like last year, we delisted Colyer, Wilson and Benning in August
Benning didn't play finals but the other 2 did
Well when that person has been available and played good consistent footy to a high level up until mid last year then and then had their whole pre season interrupted by multiple surgeries then you give them another chance.
If we give three firsts, and get three seconds back, deep draft with clubs needing points, does that make it ok?
I’d still like one of those firsts, but maybe it’s not so much of a leap.
Still think that it’s a “we’ll
Do it if we have to” not a fait accompli
If we give three firsts, and get three seconds back, deep draft with clubs needing points, does that make it ok?
I’d still like one of those firsts, but maybe it’s not so much of a leap.
Still think that it’s a “we’ll
Do it if we have to” not a fait accompli
Plus hopefully salary cap space
I actually don’t care how fat Darcy is when he has the impact he does for us. He’s had one season where multiple injuries keep derailing him and it came after two surgeries. 2023 they made the decision to send him for surgery so he missed a lot. There’s no world where you don’t give him at least an extra year to get his shit together. Same thing happens next year and it’s a genuine discussion, with Knobel et al developing in the background.You can't possibly think he's in anywhere near the physical shape 99% of the AFL is? He's a clear outlier and that is independent of injury otherwise Morabito would have been 200kg.
He's 26, at what point do you concede this is what he is? I'm giving him 1 more max but I think I'd cash out now for Warner if that was on the table.
If we got 3 seconds I think that's perfectly fine. I wouldn't expect that though. 1 or 2 + $2.5m works for me though.
Would winning a premiership do?If you do the trade, Bolton needs to kick 50 goals a year to make it worth it.
Would winning a premiership do?
Nobody (other than Cornes) is questioning his ability.Pretty sure there’s a wait and see
I actually don’t care how fat Darcy is when he has the impact he does for us. He’s had one season where multiple injuries keep derailing him and it came after two surgeries. 2023 they made the decision to send him for surgery. There’s no world where you don’t give him at least an extra year to get his shit together. Same thing happens next year and it’s a genuine discussion, with Knobel et al developing in the background.