- Thread starter
- #20,351
I'm in at this price point.
This is why I like targeting out of contract players.
You get them for unders.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm in at this price point.
I hope Aish has a great preseason. He's still decent, flexible and excellent depth. He can still push for the 23.Aish isn’t best 22 anymore.
I think bnfs are misleading in terms of player value to a team as weird as that sentence is. Would you have Switta as our 5th best player?
Players that are better / more important than Baker next year: Treacy, Amiss, Darcy, Young, Serong, Brayshaw, Clark, Pearce, Ryan, Jackson, Bolton.
I don't think it's debatable those players have a higher ceiling / output / importance Baker next year, even if a couple need to rediscover their best.
There's a few more you could argue about but those are pretty definitive IMO.
He probably only just scrapes into Richmond top 10 actual best players this year ad well.
There's a video on YouTube showing what the ladder looks like if the close games were reversed. He does 6 points and 10 points. Long story short, we make finals.Maybe getting in someone that has a heap of finals experience and is known for his clean one touch play would help?
Definitely not a good year for the twosome.Cornes makes a valid point.
jackson is supposed to be a generational/unicorn/could be anything player.
Darcy had a known injury record when we did the Big Deal.
Positionally they substantially overlap.
To have only 1 in the Top 10 for 2024, and that 9th, is a very poor return on our massive investment.
Not saying the die is cast.
But if Darcy/Jackson deliver 80% on what we signed them up for in 2025 then we will play a GF with no other list changes whatsoever.
Over to you, lads...
The nature of this clubs supportersWait where's the mentality of Baker and NOD being correlated coming from? They've got nothing to do with each other. We can fit both.
I'm not taking numbers per se. I've watch a bit of Richmond this year and paid a lot attention on Baker (and Bolton). He wasn't performing to the same level qualitatively.He was playing the high half forward role in the worst team in the AFL. No shock his numbers were down.
Wait where's the mentality of Baker and NOD being correlated coming from? They've got nothing to do with each other. We can fit both.
No current season stats available
Might be getting him mixed up with Paul Curtis? (The good smallCurtis Taylor from Norths has been delisted. Did I only see his good games?
Yeah, dumb.
Oh no! Getting Baker means someone who isn’t as good is ‘forced’ out!!
It’s like people don’t even want to improve our best 22.
I’m also not saying NOD isn’t as good, just the general vibe of getting Baler pushes someone out.
Well no der!
But aren't things that are rare considered to be more valuable?Paul Curtis, thirty goals this year.
Curtis Taylor, 33 goals in six seasons.
at Peel?I have a feeling we are going to see Banfield on the wing unfortunately...
I am. Paul Curtis is terrific from the little I have seen.Might be getting him mixed up with Paul Curtis? (The good small
Forward)
“Nothing but a complete disaster”: Cornes takes aim at Freo list calls after B&F results
“It is unbelievable.”www.sen.com.au
Just Corned having another Rant Sighhhh
I am. Paul Curtis is terrific from the little I have seen.
...not if you stop playing them when they're sore or injured.It’s going to be very difficult putting 28 players into 23 Spots.
I think people are saying you need to be careful bringing in players who are 16-23 on your list, especially when you have a young list and a number of people could improve and push him out of the 22. (Especially on a long contract)
So for baker, it depends if you rate him 11-16 player on your list, or 17 -23.
I have him in the 11-16 bracket, so I would like to bring him in.
In reality, all players like Baker and Bolton come down to cost (salary and draft capital ) vs output.
Will they improve 22, but are they worth the salary and picks you are giving up?
And the answer to that question, will differ greatly depending on where your list is. I can't see West Coast giving up any picks, while we should be looking to improve our 22 if the price is reasonable.
No current season stats available