TradeDraft
Post-Human
- Thread starter
- #1,801
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Noble, Newcombe, Durham and Pickett suggest otherwise.
yeah my bad. I didn’t really state my point very welll!!I’d argue we have a few times now, with Noble, AJ and now Long all being mature age recruits who could step in almost immediately after being drafted.
Noble, Newcombe, Durham and Pickett suggest otherwise.
The year of those drafts is off (by one year)! If you just looked at Draftguru, for some reason they're all wrongly named e.g. this one: https://www.draftguru.com.au/years/2018/midseason_draftReally?
Noble - 2018 MSD debuted R17 2019
Newcombe - 2020 MSD debuted R13 2021
Durham - 2020 MSD debuted R18 2021
Pickett - 2018 MSD debuted 2018 GF, the only 1 who played in his draft year.
Surely all of those selections were about longer term.
The year of those drafts is off (by one year)! If you just looked at Draftguru, for some reason they're all wrongly named e.g. this one: https://www.draftguru.com.au/years/2018/midseason_draft
The site calls it the 2018 AFL Mid-Season Draft, but it happened a year later!
John Noble debuted for Collingwood only a few weeks after we selected him (in 2019), and Marlion Pickett wasn't picked up in 2018, it was 2019, and that year's Grand Final when he debuted. There wasn't an MSD in 2020, and Durham and Newcombe were picked up in the middle of 2021.
I absolutely agree with that. I think a large percentage of the players selected would be in that category (players the clubs expected to be on their lists for years to come). Almost certainly 100% of those Collingwood have picked up in the MSD over the last few years would be. Even if it's correct that Ned Long only nominated a 6-month contract I doubt we'd be seriously considering axing him at the end of the season if he doesn't perform well enough. Smit is one they'll be prepared to give plenty of time to, and I think the approach our club has had all along towards this draft is the best one. We probably could have found a reasonable standard mature ruckman playing state league football and put him on the list for 6 months, but I wasn't keen on us doing that.That makes more sense. Still think all of those players were largely selected with a longer term view.
We went for best available to who was available, and this kid was the top of our list.I just can't help but feel Saad El-Hawli is who we should have grabbed first pick.
I think rucks are generally gettable from other teams
Smit looks to have great potential.We went for best available to who was available, and this kid was the top of our list.
Saad probably not exactly a need. And while a longer term option, talent first. I'm perfectly happy with the choices we made given who we available.
Last few years clubs generally have targeted rucks in MSD. You can get them for free basically wiithout trading any ND picks.
He's also a good character which should mean we're not dealing with a "Club Statement".Smit looks to have great potential.
For his age, he looks unusually coordinated and agile, if his highlights are anything to go by.
El-Hawli is going to be a JETI just can't help but feel Saad El-Hawli is who we should have grabbed first pick.
I think rucks are generally gettable from other teams
They're all going to be jets until you realise they were picked up in the MSD. There's reasons they weren't picked up in more traditional pathwaysEl-Hawli is going to be a JET