The Filth Wizard
Just here for the zipline
- Jul 26, 2007
- 94,476
- 166,209
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Coney Island Warriors
- Moderator
- #9,051
Nice guy Jack, but too injury prone for somebody that started at 25.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Only for a late pickDougal Howard?
There are always ways to get players in, as difficult as it may be. In case of Parker, we can offer more money and longer contract than most. We can also potentially offer better trade to the Swans, which is also a factor given he's contracted.Surely as a supporter base we can be honest with ourselves and acknowledge that we're unlikely to get the best available talent on the market. This has always been the case. Even for those toward the end of the career, there is little motivation to choose to come and play for North at this point. Why would Luke Parker come and play for North when he he'd likely be coveted by big Victorian teams that are in a position to contend. Houston - genuine pipe dream. We've invested in the draft, we need some established players that have high standards on and off field to help plug holes temporarily while the team develops.
Need a general. Someone who commands attention and oozes leadership. Because the ones we have now arent worth a pinch of shitIf we bring 4 experienced players in, at the end of their careers, we will waste 80 games next year of players assimilating to a new game plan, 80 games that could go to the kids learning in the big stage, and 80 games of chemistry being built.
I can live with 20 or 30 for blokes who can bring big game experience, but if they aren’t here in four years there’s no point.
Better to find the Josh Gibson project types that have already played 50-100 games so they can grow too if you are looking for experienced players for the other 50-60 games you’re giving to older players.
I’m not sure if Tucker is in our next premiership side but he has been far better this year than last and could be a valuable player through the rebuild.
And Fisher or Stephens may prove to be that next year, maybe not.
But getting four ageing blokes in is a waste of time - we had Greenwood as an example and he died on the vine in the twos.
I'd keep Pink as insurance for 1 more year, consider keeping Drury as he's one of the few showing something in VFL, while Taylor and Harvey are touch and go. I'd delist Biggie as well, or is he contracted?I think we have to remove 2x rookie spots this year so I have 8 delisting's required to have 6 list spots open:
- 3-4 draft
- 1-2 trade
- 1 DFA
Delisting group for me in order to choose from:
- Thomas
- Greenwood
- Shiels
- Taylor
- Lazarro
- Drury
- Sellers
- Harvey
- Pink
- Free
Key targets for me are:
- small forward (with pace)
- small defender (with pace)
- Inside/Outside mid (with 2-way repeatable pace)
- KP forward
I think we have to remove 2x rookie spots this year so I have 8 delisting's required to have 6 list spots open:
- 3-4 draft
- 1-2 trade
- 1 DFA
Delisting group for me in order to choose from:
- Thomas
- Greenwood
- Shiels
- Taylor
- Lazarro
- Drury
- Sellers
- Harvey
- Pink
- Free
Key targets for me are:
- small forward (with pace)
- small defender (with pace)
- Inside/Outside mid (with 2-way repeatable pace)
- KP forward
Pink triggered an extension and Biggie is contracted for next year.I'd keep Pink as insurance for 1 more year, consider keeping Drury as he's one of the few showing something in VFL, while Taylor and Harvey are touch and go. I'd delist Biggie as well, or is he contracted?
I think we have to remove 2x rookie spots this year so I have 8 delisting's required to have 6 list spots open:
- 3-4 draft
- 1-2 trade
- 1 DFA
Delisting group for me in order to choose from:
- Thomas
- Greenwood
- Shiels
- Taylor
- Lazarro
- Drury
- Sellers
- Harvey
- Pink
- Free
Key targets for me are:
- small forward (with pace)
- small defender (with pace)
- Inside/Outside mid (with 2-way repeatable pace)
- KP forward
Pink hit a contract trigger, he's here until 2025.I think we have to remove 2x rookie spots this year so I have 8 delisting's required to have 6 list spots open:
- 3-4 draft
- 1-2 trade
- 1 DFA
Delisting group for me in order to choose from:
- Thomas
- Greenwood
- Shiels
- Taylor
- Lazarro
- Drury
- Sellers
- Harvey
- Pink
- Free
Key targets for me are:
- small forward (with pace)
- small defender (with pace)
- Inside/Outside mid (with 2-way repeatable pace)
- KP forward
We have 46 on our lists at the moment, ie. we are 4 over not 2. The two extra rookie places we will lose plus the two players we took in the msd to cover LTI's. We will need to delist or trade out ten players to get those six free list spots.I think we have to remove 2x rookie spots this year so I have 8 delisting's required to have 6 list spots open:
- 3-4 draft
- 1-2 trade
- 1 DFA
Delisting group for me in order to choose from:
- Thomas
- Greenwood
- Shiels
- Taylor
- Lazarro
- Drury
- Sellers
- Harvey
- Pink
- Free
Key targets for me are:
- small forward (with pace)
- small defender (with pace)
- Inside/Outside mid (with 2-way repeatable pace)
- KP forward
Sounds like they are going down the path we went which is to gut the list and go to the draft.Now it starts, Richmond are going to have some amazing picks in this draft, so interesting.
We start with: 2, 22, 40, 58, 65
Trade Pick 2 and F2 for GC's pick 6, 11, 20
6, 11, 20, 22, 40, 58, 65
Trade 11 & 58 For Houston.
Trade 40 For Parker.
Go to the draft with 6, 20, 22, 65
Pick 6 - Harry Armstrong or Jack Whitlock (Key Forward)
Pick 20 - Joe Berry (Small Forward)
Pick 22 - Kayle Gerreyn or Jobe Shanahan (Key Forward)
Pick 65 - Pat Retschko or Jack Ough or Luca Greggo (Utilities)
Rookie 1: River Stevens (half forward)
Rookie 2: Evan Bradley (small forward)
Round 1 2024:
B: Goater, Comben, Corr
HB: Houston, Logue, Archer
C: Mckercher, Parker, Scott
HF: Sheezel, Teakle, Zurhaar
F: Curtis, Larkey, Berry
Foll: Xerri, LDU, Wardlaw
Int/Depth: Powell, Simpkin, Fisher, Tucker, McDonald, Ford, Hardeman, Payne, Stephens ect.
Sounds like they are going down the path we went which is to gut the list and go to the draft.
Yes they will get draft picks, but they are giving up quality that is in the prime age bracket, so it’s a massive risk if you don’t nail those draft picks.
What would you rather keep a player like LDU now entering his prime years or to take a punt on 2 x most likely mid to late first rounders?
Good hypothetical but I think Port are going to probably want a top 10 pick for Houston and not sure Berry lasts to pick 20.We start with: 2, 22, 40, 58, 65
Trade Pick 2 and F2 for GC's pick 6, 11, 20
6, 11, 20, 22, 40, 58, 65
Trade 11 & 58 For Houston.
Trade 40 For Parker.
Go to the draft with 6, 20, 22, 65
Pick 6 - Harry Armstrong or Jack Whitlock (Key Forward)
Pick 20 - Joe Berry (Small Forward)
Pick 22 - Kayle Gerreyn or Jobe Shanahan (Key Forward)
Pick 65 - Pat Retschko or Jack Ough or Luca Greggo (Utilities)
Rookie 1: River Stevens (half forward)
Rookie 2: Evan Bradley (small forward)
Round 1 2024:
B: Goater, Comben, Corr
HB: Houston, Logue, Archer
C: Mckercher, Parker, Scott
HF: Sheezel, Teakle, Zurhaar
F: Curtis, Larkey, Berry
Foll: Xerri, LDU, Wardlaw
Int/Depth: Powell, Simpkin, Fisher, Tucker, McDonald, Ford, Hardeman, Payne, Stephens ect.
Wouldn't it be grand if it indeed was that simple.
And Comben will be up the other end of the ground where he belongs.
You crazy buggers need to get use to that
Hi Tigers supporter - interested in the opinions of supporters who are attached to a rebuilding club as this is our next few years.Sounds like they are going down the path we went which is to gut the list and go to the draft.
Yes they will get draft picks, but they are giving up quality that is in the prime age bracket, so it’s a massive risk if you don’t nail those draft picks.
What would you rather keep a player like LDU now entering his prime years or to take a punt on 2 x most likely mid to late first rounders?
Other clubs seem to make it simple like that. For some reason, we can never seen to address the missing links on our list.
Regarding Comben, I don't care which end of the ground he plays at, just so long as we don't ignore picking up a few more talls in the draft. We desperately need more talls coming through the ranks.
Hi Tigers supporter - interested in the opinions of supporters who are attached to a rebuilding club as this is our next few years.
Firstly Richmond has no choice but to trade out players in their prime such as Bolton, Rioli etc as they have trade value now, however, will not in 2 or 3 years. We are an aged team whose list is stuffed/past it and totally injury prone. We need youth injections and the risk is to not trade out as our players will eventually have less suitors as they age further.
Has North erred in not keeping a few of their older players or bringing in a few from other clubs whilst kids were developing?
Your rebuild has taken too long and I’d like to no why this is.
Even though your ladder position is not good, your base now is and it won’t be long until you impact.
Pink triggered an extension and Biggie is contracted for next year.
Biggie should be paid out.
Along with CCJ and Stephenson.