Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm actually astonished how many nuffies on the eagles board lap up his dribble. Not sure if he's the ultimate troll, or just an absolute w@nker who gets off from this stuffWCE_Phil
His state league form has always been excellent. That's how he tricks teams into giving him a shot.Narkle played his way into a finals team with just five SANFL games this year. His form at SANFL level was excellent.
He has speed and his ball use is excellent meaning he could be a good sub option. If we recruited him as an SSP he would only be costing a rookie spot and wage. As a depth player he would at least give as a good ball user if he played any games. Apparently more than a few Port supporters were surprised he was delisted. i wouldnt mind him as a SSP signing.
SANFL Showreel, R19: Quinton Narkle highlights
Enjoy Quinton Narkle's standout SANFL performance for Port Adelaidewww.afl.com.au
Isn't the biggest issue with Narkle his lack of two way running?
He played 5 games at SANFL level after an injury ruined most of his season before getting back into a AFL finals team. I like him as an SSP selection due to how his skills are very good and if got an injury or three I want a player with skills getting a game. Far from a spud Narkle can impact a game with low possessions.His state league form has always been excellent. That's how he tricks teams into giving him a shot.
State league form and AFL potential don't have a perfect correlation otherwise we wouldn't see guys in their mid-20s win Sandovers and get overlooked for in the draft for guys of a similar age and output at state league level.
People are seriously, ridiculously over exaggerating this big time. Part of the reason Port are useless in finals is because they consistently play blokes like Evans and Narkle in finals.He played 5 games at SANFL level after an injury ruined most of his season before getting back into a AFL finals team. I like him as an SSP selection due to how his skills are very good and if got an injury or three I want a player with skills getting a game. Far from a spud Narkle can impact a game with low possessions.
It looks to have improved a ton. He averaged 20 possessions at SANFL level last year so he's able to accumulate more and spent time playing midfield.Isn't the biggest issue with Narkle his lack of two way running?
Shane was very very good. We use to call him 'nosey'.
His highlighs say oherwise. Some players take extra time to get afl finess. I think Narkle's slowly built his fitness at afl level. We are about an SSP selection only.People are seriously, ridiculously over exaggerating this big time. Part of the reason Port are useless in finals is because they consistently play blokes like Evans and Narkle in finals.
GWS are no different with O'Halloran and Lachie Keefe.
Just because you play in a finals team, doesn't mean you're a good player.
Narkle is meh, if we take him, so be it, but he is bang on average at absolute best
His highlighs say oherwise. Some players take extra time to get afl finess. I think Narkle's slowly built his fitness at afl level. We are about an SSP selection only.
Im not. Its an SSP selection so he's on the rookie list and a depth player. All Im saying is I like a depth player who has good skills.Highlights reel? Mate, everybody's highlights reel looks sexy. Slowly built to afl fitness? He's bloody nearly 27 and been delisted twice, how slow can you be haha!!
It seems 99% likely we'll take him, so it is what it is. But I wouldn't be getting my hopes up if I were you.
Yeah that's not what Bussy means..Shane Parker's Nick name at the club was "bussy" because his arms looked like he was driving a bus when he ran.
I'm going to agree to disagree. My opinion isn't going to change anything and neither is yours.
I genuinely believe my post is fair though .
Just think there's so many better uses of a list spot. I don't think he's needed depth. At best he'll be like Brodie. Stuck behind the actual depth players as a last resort robbing someone like Cooper Simpson the opportunity he needs to reach his potential.
Pants is bad.I’m trying to work out what Lach72 means with “ Emmett has been pants for nearly all games “ ?
What is Pants ?
Yeah it’s brutal.
I think it’s no exaggeration to say on the whole we have been the worst goalscoring team in the AFL over the last 10 or 15 years.
It’s only in the last season or two that I’ve really felt we finally have some natural goalscorers. Amiss, Treacy, Sturt.
They types you don’t even realise it but they are piling on goals week in week out.
Lobb and tabs were there for years and we used to get so excited when they made it to 35 goals a season when they were in their prime.
Meanwhile 36 year old Buddy Franklin would have 55 kicked and everyone would be saying he’s cooked. The likes of Ollie Henry at Geelong would have 40 kicked as a medium forward 21 year old and would be a distant third on their goalkickers list but would probably won our leading goalkicker award with that total for most of the last 10 years.
It’s 2012 I think, since a freo player kicked 50 in a season.
Every other club has had a 50 goal season player in the last 3 years.
Long long overdue, should happen next year if Treacy or amiss play a full season.
If I had to guess its come from what pants tend to hold - arsePants is bad.
Can also be used to replace slurs in a child friendly environment.
Not sure on the origin of it
Don’t think he’d be any higher than fifth, maybe even sixth in the KPD pecking order.
The Narkle signing makes sense to me now I know who his manager is. It’s an absolute disgrace.
Pants is bad.
Can also be used to replace slurs in a child friendly environment.
Not sure on the origin of it
Obviously not but that's a high bar.Is Tom Emmett better than Mitch Crowden?
Answer that and you'll have your view if he can make it or not.
I think your extreme opinion that Narkle is one of the worst players you've ever seen (extreme hyperbole really) is clouding things on this.Don’t think he’d be any higher than fifth, maybe even sixth in the KPD pecking order.
The Narkle signing makes sense to me now I know who his manager is. It’s an absolute disgrace.
Anthony Van Der Wielen who has had a few run ins with the club over the years, mainly with RTB I think.And who is his manager or needn’t I ask ?