Half Back Pocket
Premiership Player
Straight in to FB….
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Correct. Worth noting he went hands on after work commitments changed.
I find the constant defence of poor ceo footy gms list managers frustrating.
Finnis wasn't a good football club ceo.
Lethers wasn't either. Wasn't a good footy gm.
Trout was terrible. Libba worse. Toce although better still under whelming.
Rath horrible.
Gags and cox the worst appointments I've seen. Just terrible.
Hopefully we can do better moving forward.
Hopefully bassat can get some outcomes from the AFL.
They all were head recruiters at some point bar gags. All were terrible.Toce was a recruiter, as others left he rose through the ranks.
Maybe too much.
Thoughts on having a sniff at the lad that lost us the Giants game earlier this year, James Peatling? Has been a good performer for the Giants but they've got so much midfield depth he keeps getting pushed out to VFL or sub. Well-rounded midfielder who can also play half forward and wing. Played 2 VFL games this year for 25 and 31 disposals, kicking 3 and 2 goals. Has 27 disposals at 3QT today in the VFL. Could possibly get him for a 3rd rounder or late second. 23 yrs old View attachment 2033569
I think it’s the other way round. The AFL are only interested in maximising revenue for the AFL. Hence they give the big clubs (Collingwood, Essendon, Richmond, Carlton) prime time slots, and want them up the pointy end of the ladder.I'd love someone to ask the AFL either off the record or on it... if the high level of financial assistance we receive from the AFL means we have to take a "back seat" in other areas.
For example the fixture and draw. Which can make or break a clubs run at the top 4.
I'd even go as far as saying MRP and tribunal outcomes especially ones that are used to set the standard moving forward.
How about the evaluation on what is consider in cap and out of cap income for a player. For example if a club like Collingwood receives very little AFL assistance does it mean they have more wiggle room when it comes to what payments a player receives will be included in the cap?
The reason I ask is we have been pretty vocal about wanting to get off AFL financial help. Then you had clubs like dogs speaking very loudly about the need to get off it and when they did get off were not prepared to go back for help even during covid. The fear of going back on was strong for them. Have to wonder why that is.
The sooner we get off the bitch list the better.I'd love someone to ask the AFL either off the record or on it... if the high level of financial assistance we receive from the AFL means we have to take a "back seat" in other areas.
For example the fixture and draw. Which can make or break a clubs run at the top 4.
I'd even go as far as saying MRP and tribunal outcomes especially ones that are used to set the standard moving forward.
How about the evaluation on what is consider in cap and out of cap income for a player. For example if a club like Collingwood receives very little AFL assistance does it mean they have more wiggle room when it comes to what payments a player receives will be included in the cap?
The reason I ask is we have been pretty vocal about wanting to get off AFL financial help. Then you had clubs like dogs speaking very loudly about the need to get off it and when they did get off were not prepared to go back for help even during covid. The fear of going back on was strong for them. Have to wonder why that is.
Exactly. We can’t really demand more rights when we’re queuing up at the soup kitchen. Even though it’s half the afls fault that we are .The sooner we get off the bitch list the better.
Had a day to think about thislol exactly this, you'd think marshall wilkie and nas have all requested a trade.
the two candidates are battle and steele
love battle and would love to keep him but also another first rounder used on a mid would be a good/great return for our list
steele... tbh I've never been that big on steele, he's decent, don't think he's a great leader, quite one paced and not damaging enought to be a top line mid. In another era he'd be a 3rd or even 4th stringer in our midfield. If he goes he goes.
gresham I was happy to see go.
if we were to lose Nas, Chito, Windhager, Wilkie, Wilson... then I'd be worried
Things can change quickIt would mean we are expecting big things from Arie and Howard.
Also- we'd be banking on wilkie staying fit and elite well into his 30s
Devon Robertson as wellThoughts on having a sniff at the lad that lost us the Giants game earlier this year, James Peatling? Has been a good performer for the Giants but they've got so much midfield depth he keeps getting pushed out to VFL or sub. Well-rounded midfielder who can also play half forward and wing. Played 2 VFL games this year for 25 and 31 disposals, kicking 3 and 2 goals. Has 27 disposals at 3QT today in the VFL. Could possibly get him for a 3rd rounder or late second. 23 yrs old View attachment 2033569
I think if Deven leaves, it'll be back to WA especially with Eagles having previous interest. Worth a try tho, I liked him in his draft yearDevon Robertson as well
To be fair we have a whole new recruiting team pretty muchStengle not available best news today!
Couldn't trust the clowns we have trading to not do another Hannebery/Hill!
Once bitten, twice shy!To be fair we have a whole new recruiting team pretty much
No doubt we’ll nab 2 at the draft. Time to develop them!Once bitten, twice shy!
No more small forwards or half back flankers, need mids and more mids.
Yes, that was the excuse given for the Hannebery debacle and for overpaying for Hill.No doubt we’ll nab 2 at the draft. Time to develop them!
We do struggle getting FA across the line. We’re like the kid at school who gets picked last for the Newcombe team because we’re geeks
They all were head recruiters at some point bar gags. All were terrible.