Training 2024 training updates.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m hoping they only take Teakle as we need an additional ready to play ruck imo

and maybe 1 other from that list… leave spots open in the MSD

Kelly no - had 5 years. Is he a winger? Defender? More identity issues than tik tok

Bytel no - ditto had 5 years at saints. Good VFL stats like Macrae but not at the next level

Sosofrinidis no - Spindly build gives me Oxley flashbacks. Club could’ve taken an immediately better ready made intercept defender in Marty Hore but ignored him

Hustwaite no - why invite him ti train when he has been at the club for years? Would’ve been taken in the rookie draft if they really wanted him

Eyre 50/50 - with Murphy’s issues, Deans injuries… pies need another KPD in my opinion. Kid has shown some glimpses in the VFL this year.

But why haven’t they invited the fullback Phillips from Port Melbourne down?

Much more likely success story than Eyre

Edit: Bytel might be worth a look. Had a several impactful games at the saints 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

I’m hoping they only take Teakle as we need an additional ready to play ruck imo

and maybe 1 other from that list… leave spots open in the MSD

Kelly no - had 5 years. Is he a winger? Defender? More identity issues than tik tok

Bytel no - ditto had 5 years at saints. Good VFL stats like Macrae but not at the next level

Sosofrinidis no - Spindly build gives me Oxley flashbacks. Club could’ve taken an immediately better ready made intercept defender in Marty Hore but ignored him

Hustwaite no - why invite him ti train when he has been at the club for years? Would’ve been taken in the rookie draft if they really wanted him

Eyre 50/50 - with Murphy’s issues, Deans injuries… pies need another KPD in my opinion. Kid has shown some glimpses in the VFL this year.

But why haven’t they invited the fullback Phillips from Port Melbourne down?

Much more likely success story than Eyre
Not sure I understand the reasoning for leaving a list spot open for the MSD, I know that we've done alright out of the MSD in the past, but as we found out last year with Markov, if there's a spot free and we've got a player who can justify a spot on our list, then why not sign them up? Take someone at the MSD if we've opened up a list spot as a result of a retirement or long term injury - if we don't have either, by the mid-way mark of the year, then our SSP signings have had an extra 6 months on our list to fit into our program.
 
Not sure I understand the reasoning for leaving a list spot open for the MSD, I know that we've done alright out of the MSD in the past, but as we found out last year with Markov, if there's a spot free and we've got a player who can justify a spot on our list, then why not sign them up? Take someone at the MSD if we've opened up a list spot as a result of a retirement or long term injury - if we don't have either, by the mid-way mark of the year, then our SSP signings have had an extra 6 months on our list to fit into our program.
Maybe this year because we're trialling so many they may not leave a spot open for the MSD.
 
Love the 2 maniac old timers Pendles and Titch starting day 1
Good thing they did, as none of the leadership group was there. Mitchell and Pendles were leading from the front, and they prob trusted the experience out there to help the kids along.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dean, Steene (21), Begg, & Allan all looked noticeably bigger.

(HDM wearing 13; TJ: 19).
I agree, Steene clearly has added some strength to his upper body. Looked much bigger.
 
Maybe this year because we're trialling so many they may not leave a spot open for the MSD.
It might depend on if Dean looks fit & firing, although Eyre can play at both ends.

Plenty of good judges down there.

In Fly I trust.
 
Not sure I understand the reasoning for leaving a list spot open for the MSD, I know that we've done alright out of the MSD in the past, but as we found out last year with Markov, if there's a spot free and we've got a player who can justify a spot on our list, then why not sign them up? Take someone at the MSD if we've opened up a list spot as a result of a retirement or long term injury - if we don't have either, by the mid-way mark of the year, then our SSP signings have had an extra 6 months on our list to fit into our program.

For mine the MSD is seeing which mature age players have performed best at state level eg Noble/Johnson

… or taking an overage 19 year old kid who may have been hampered in his draft year

I prefer when we have a spot in it rather than missing out like last year

Also as I mentioned in my previous post I’m just not really into the list of players that they currently have training…
 
He was impressive today. His tackling, running and bursting through packs. he's been working in the off season.
Excellent. Seems like he’s learned his lesson the hard way, potentially at the cost of a premiership medal.

(Yes I know he had a broken bone, but odds are that injury would never have happened if he was in the senior squad instead of in the VFL)
 
Not sure I understand the reasoning for leaving a list spot open for the MSD, I know that we've done alright out of the MSD in the past, but as we found out last year with Markov, if there's a spot free and we've got a player who can justify a spot on our list, then why not sign them up? Take someone at the MSD if we've opened up a list spot as a result of a retirement or long term injury - if we don't have either, by the mid-way mark of the year, then our SSP signings have had an extra 6 months on our list to fit into our program.
It's a great way to save some money on the SC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top