Combined Rankings 15-Oct
New
Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,248
- 87,309
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Last edited:
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2024 Young Talent Time (Drafting)
- Thread starter Ysaye
- Start date
- Tagged users None
At our first pick Lindsay or Berry, happy with Gerryn next, and they must see silky skills in Carr…. So start the Carr.
Good haul if it happens.
Prefer Lindsay over Berry by the way but I’ve been a bad judge in the past and in Walls I trust
Good haul if it happens.
Prefer Lindsay over Berry by the way but I’ve been a bad judge in the past and in Walls I trust
- Dec 6, 2020
- 3,570
- 7,589
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Snuffaluphagus are you going to update the table with all the recent phantoms that have been released?
Wallsy78
Debutant
- May 28, 2024
- 119
- 630
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
The latest phantom draft from The Age with information gained from recruiters. A few mentions of how Freo could trade up for St Kilda's 2nd top 10 pick. It's mentioned it would likely be for Bo Allan. Personally think Travaglia would be the other option if we did trade up
Also, among the players linked to freo in the second round are Cooper Hynes (Richmond, Port, Freo), Angus Clarke (Freo)
- Jul 13, 2012
- 1,957
- 4,015
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Do we have enough to move up to 8? Would 14 + F1 get it done?
Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #2,005
Would you be content with Fremantle making that trade if it were the other way around? A six place slide for a future first?
I think our board will be upset if we pay that much to move up to pick a player that doesn't really fit an immediate need - then if/when Bo turns into a gun midfielder/half back we will look at it as massive value.
Bigger picture I'd struggle to see how we'd give up 10 and 11 to then trade 14 back up to 8 for a F1.
Any chance we're doing StK a solid, if StK want to split 8 and we've got the pick directly before GWS take 15 and 16? Make some noise StK are open to splitting 8, we're narrowing it down to GWS preferred target(s)?
Wallsy78
Debutant
- May 28, 2024
- 119
- 630
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Cal mentioned on Gettable Wednesday that we are trying to bundle 14 + 30 to move up. So is St Kilda happy to slide back 6 spots to add pick 30? Potentially if they want a player that will be there later. Also the option of future pick swaps to add in
I think F1 is untouchable for us considering players like Chad and Kozzy could be gettable.
We surveyed 13 AFL recruiters. This is how we predict the draft will unfold
The best and brightest young football prospects in the land will learn their fate in next week’s AFL draft. We’ve studied the form and the needs of the clubs to devise our phantom draft for the first round of selections.
On SM-S918B using BigFooty.com mobile app
We would offer F2. Doubt that gets any interest from St Kilda. The other option would be 8, F2 > 14, F1 or 8 > 14/30.
Don’t like it myself but that would be closer to the mark.
F1 for a 6 place upgrade would be a terrible deal.
I just can’t , for the life of me , understand how , after giving up 10/11 (without too much fight let’s be real here)to slide back to 14 … to only then , seek to trade BACK up , during the actual draft itself no less ,when you can be assured theres always at least a 20% surcharge (probably 30+ % in this draft) … and finally all for Bo Allan, who’s a player /even on projection in areas we already have great developing depth??
Other than wallsy perhaps trying to play 4d chess (fair chance tbh)in the hope the “chatter” panics a team into picking another player (not just Allan) that in turn see the player we really want possibly sliding ??
Outside of that ,can someone make sense of it all for me?
Other than wallsy perhaps trying to play 4d chess (fair chance tbh)in the hope the “chatter” panics a team into picking another player (not just Allan) that in turn see the player we really want possibly sliding ??
Outside of that ,can someone make sense of it all for me?
I doubt we know how much we fought or didn't. Clearly getting Bolton was the number one priority and then take it from there. Seems the latter is where we are at now.
