Preview 2025 Best 22 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

My 23 first picked - roughly in order. Chuck em wherever they fit.
Serong
Young
Brayshaw
Pearce
Darcy
Clark
Jackson
Ryan
Treacy
Bolton
Amiss
Cox
Chappy
Walker
Switta
Johnson
Sharp
Draper
Sturt
O'Driscoll
Reid
Freddy
Wagner


On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Lazy journalism hoss, put them in their starting positions please. 😁
 
My 23 first picked - roughly in order. Chuck em wherever they fit.
Serong
Young
Brayshaw
Pearce
Darcy
Clark
Jackson
Ryan
Treacy
Bolton
Amiss
Cox
Chappy
Walker
Switta
Johnson
Sharp
Draper
Sturt
O'Driscoll
Reid
Freddy
Wagner


On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app

I agree with you but there’s three glaring omissions that I fear JL won’t have the guts to leave out.
 
I agree with you but there’s three glaring omissions that I fear JL won’t have the guts to leave out.
I've noticed this phenomenon across many teams, this idea the coach doesn't have the "guts" to drop certain "favourites".

I mean if they believed it would make the team better there's very few cases I believe they'd keep them in the team.

More likely in my mind, and which I've spoken about before, is that there are roles and requirements which aren't obvious to the average observer.
 
My 23 first picked - roughly in order. Chuck em wherever they fit.
Serong
Young
Brayshaw
Pearce
Darcy
Clark
Jackson
Ryan
Treacy
Bolton
Amiss
Cox
Chappy
Walker
Switta
Johnson
Sharp
Draper
Sturt
O'Driscoll
Reid
Freddy
Wagner


On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app

100%

3 players unfortunately have to make way for Banfield Fyfe O'Meara
 
I've noticed this phenomenon across many teams, this idea the coach doesn't have the "guts" to drop certain "favourites".

I mean if they believed it would make the team better there's very few cases I believe they'd keep them in the team.

More likely in my mind, and which I've spoken about before, is that there are roles and requirements which aren't obvious to the average observer.
Exactly. The "tough" decision selection committee will have to make is more likely picking Fyfe, Walters, while the FB/Twitter/Instagram pages are full of Flagmantle types banging on about bringing in "the future".
 
Ideally, all of Fyfe, Walters and O'Meara would be out of the team at the start of the year, how long do we actually believe it'll be until they get phased out though?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I know moving him forward was a disaster but now we've got the JJJs he could be pretty handy as a third tall rotation
I really don't think so. He was never that good permanent forward when he was gun. Can't see how he'd be anything other than a liability now. Zero pressure and probably only half the arial presence.

Worse yet, his man would come off him all day because worst case scenario for the other team, Fyfe takes a mark and kicks a set shot.

He just can't play there.
 
Exactly. The "tough" decision selection committee will have to make is more likely picking Fyfe, Walters, while the FB/Twitter/Instagram pages are full of Flagmantle types banging on about bringing in "the future".
The people making the decision also have significantly more info than us popcorn eaters.
There doesn't have to be a conspiracy or "photos" or the usual tropes that gets trotted out.

Just to be clear I'm not suggesting they don't get it wrong, but making decisions is always tougher than it looks from the outside (even Cox mentioned it in his Sydney presser).

The other thing that always irks me is the magic beans that are new draftees. I've never got within cooee of high level sport, but even I know stepping up from an U18 comp to the big time is a serious jump that not many can manage, yet we always have new draftees being put in the B23 instantly.
 
Ideally, all of Fyfe, Walters and O'Meara would be out of the team at the start of the year, how long do we actually believe it'll be until they get phased out though?

Walters, Aish got dropped last year. Banfield as well.

I don't doubt JL can do it.

I expect Fyfe and Erasmus to play half the games each this year. Not sure O'Meara, but if he is our 22nd player then we will be OK.
 
Went forward in 2024? From 2022 or 2023?

I am ballsy, gutsy or smart? Personal and career wise no but investing in property is another matter.

As for my point, kicking long to contest from a kick out isn't brave and lacks creativity. Having the same 6-6-6 set up 100% of the time again shows he doesn't go outside of the box.

There are no surprises at team selection, and he's sent one of the tall backs forward a few times.

My guess he wouldn't have the guts to drop Fyfe, or Walters if they become witch's hats.
"investing in property" , everyones ballsy, gutsy and smart in a rising market...
pretty hard to be a loser ...whereas only one winner in the afl!
afl coaching teams decisions are more like "life or death", essentially different and not comparable.
Winning is so simple on BF!
 
Last edited:
Fyfe is on 240 games and Walters is on 239.

I wonder if the plan is to manage them in a way so that they both reach the big 250 milestone during the home and away season. Though it can disrupt the chemistry of the midfield and forward line if there are near weekly selection changes.
I dont think think there is any chance of that being a factor...poor risk/reward ratio.
The "management" is balancing development and H&A wins as top priorities....
Bravely managing the Risks!
 
Last edited:
Coaches will always need to make hard decisions on Veterans. The question do they have the guts and smarts to transition older players.

Banfield has never been a top line player, and it's just a hard conversation that he needs to fight for games.

O'Meara isn't a Docker champion, and he already knows that he could be dropped like last year.

Walters is a club legend and the coach should be smart and transition him out. Maybe, say to him that he won't be playing every week and be managed as sub or play limited number of games. Playing him at Peel would be a slap in the face.

Fyfe last season had some great games but other games he was a witch's hat. We need to play him 15-16 games. Reduced travel and never play a game less than a 7-day break.
All 4 of the players you mentioned should be selected on merit. Shouldn't even be an alternative for Banfield and O'Meara.

You seem to be suggesting Walters should be used as a sub but not played at Peel. Terrible idea and one that seems designed to benefit him (his ego) but doesn't benefit the team. If playing at Peel keeps him in the best condition, then play him at Peel.

Same with Fyfe.
 
I dont think think there is any chance of that being a factor...poor risk/reward ratio.
The "management" is balancing development and H&A wins as top priorities....
Bravely managing the Risks!
Oh I agree that it shouldn’t be a factor.

But whether it is their on-field experience that he values or their status and standing at the club that makes them hard to drop, I’m not convinced that JLo will leave them out of the team for extended periods.

Maybe stronger competition from the likes of Bolton and Erasmus will help make the decisions for him.

Managing our fading superstars will be a huge challenge for him in 2025.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview 2025 Best 22 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top