I'd say wingWhere is McDuffy going to be played, tall midfielder/wing, or running defender??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'd say wingWhere is McDuffy going to be played, tall midfielder/wing, or running defender??
& O’Monahan this year?I'd say wing
Sounds like he's probably got the tank to play wing as well.I'd say wing
Sounds like he's probably got the tank to play wing as well.
Won a 2km time trial in 6m24s over in Ireland - which would have placed him just outside of the top half dozen in the AFL draft combine this year....and sounded like the conditions were less than ideal. First time running the trial, and reckons he could break the 6 minute barrier in Australia.
"Over the last fortnight, club representatives flew into Ireland and put some hopefuls through their paces, including a 2km time trial.
Duffy won that race in six minutes 24 seconds and reckons he could have gone faster in different conditions. It clearly impressed Carlton, who described him as a “running machine” when announcing his signing."
Rising Longford star Matt Duffy: AFL was too big a chance to turn down
It’s been a breakthrough 12 months for ‘The Irish Experiment’ in the AFL.www.independent.ie
You'd hope soRate him better than Monahan
Of the top 10 in the Brownlow 1 was traded but 4 were not available in the open draft. So half of the top 10 have been traded or you are unable to draft.I found today's "Gettable", on the AFL app, quite interesting.
From about the 12min mark Twomey discusses Trade/FA approach vs the draft.
Top 10 Brownlow 2024 - 1 not drafted by club.
14 club B&F winners drafted by club.
Top 21 vote getters in Players Assoc Award - 17 drafted by club.
Cripps, Serong, Gulden, Butters, McLuggage, Max Holmes, Merrett, Newcombe, A Brayshaw, Noah Anderson and N Daicos (FS but still drafted)
Trade/FA certainly has its place and needs to be done occasionally to fill areas of need, but primarily the best team's lists are built through the draft. Just gotta get the selections right.
On SM-G980F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Oh I agree. Whenever it's required to improve your list, absolutely.Of the top 10 in the Brownlow 1 was traded but 4 were not available in the open draft. So half of the top 10 have been traded or you are unable to draft.
The top 21 of the AFLCA vote 7 of the top 21 are the same.
Considering probably 10 times the value of draft picks are used in the draft rather then traded I still think I would be looking to make as many trades as I could every single year your salary cap allows.
Save one rookie spot for SSP - we've already indicated we'll have a spot free. Prob means just one rookie in your scenario.With Haynes, the elevating of Boyd, and the return of Duffy as a rookie A player, we have 32 senior list players, 4 rookie A and 1 rookie B.
That's 7 spots to fill and they can 4-6 seniors, or 1-3 rookies.
I think we will go with 5 seniors and 2 rookies at this stage. Pick 3, Pick 38 and the Campo boys, one DFA and 2 rookies.
If 38 is burnt on Ben Camporeale though, we'd probably take an extra DFA.
I'm loving the flexibility we have right now.
The point is we have room to add the likes of Allison if he suits us. With his endurance base and marking ability, he could be a tall winger like Mason Wood. He could end up being a lead up link player that means McKay can stay at home or we have a dual threat up the line.
We don't have that exact type. Acres would never be accused of being a key forward, so height and reach are two different things.
The Saints couldn't use him in that role as they already had Wood.
I at least like the out of the box thinking and reinventing of players with decent attributes but no form to fall back on.
Duffy will be Cat B.With Haynes, the elevating of Boyd, and the return of Duffy as a rookie A player, we have 32 senior list players, 4 rookie A and 1 rookie B.
That's 7 spots to fill and they can 4-6 seniors, or 1-3 rookies.
I think we will go with 5 seniors and 2 rookies at this stage. Pick 3, Pick 38 and the Campo boys, one DFA and 2 rookies.
Duffy is already listed as a Cat-B player on the AFL website, though whether that's accurate or not, I don't know - there's a published date of 13-Nov for "International signings". And you'd like to think Carlton would have published something if it was already done. Either way, I agree, he will be Cat-B.Duffy will be Cat B.
The DFA period is closed.
I’d be pretty shocked if we add more than 4 to the Senior List (all in the ND) then probably 1-2 in the Rookie Draft, leaving 1-2 spots open for SSP.
25% of the fringe.The list ain't 90% there. We just delisted 25% of our list.
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
But our traded out players are still valued at bugger all.
Duffy will be Cat B.
The DFA period is closed.
I’d be pretty shocked if we add more than 4 to the Senior List (all in the ND) then probably 1-2 in the Rookie Draft, leaving 1-2 spots open for SSP.
The rookie spot makes no difference as the list size can only be 44 anyway. However, there is/was a rule that you can only have one Irish Rookie B on your list and any others have to be Rookie A. Unless Monahan is Rookie A, this would mean Duffy has to be A. I guess we could have asked for special dispensation.
DFA or SSP, we can sign delisted players regardless.
There was an interview with Liam in the papers the other day where he talked about how after being drafted in the 2nd round he barely played year 1 due to covid and then had a reasonable year in the 2s in defense where he though he was tracking well. At his exit interview Fly said the Pies were closer to a Premiership than they had thought and were going for more experienced options and then brought in Frampton (and maybe Kreuger). I guess it worked for the Pies but it has left them with a hole in their youth. Liam was very stiff to be dropped and we definitely need the depth.I went back and looked at Cooper Lord's VFL highlights yesterday. The two things you pick up from those clips were firstly, how ridiculously impressive he was from his first game in the navy.
And secondly, if we don't add Liam McMahon to our senior list, we're crazy imo. He can easily slot in as a 3rd marking option up forward behind Charles and H. Leads into space, excellent overhead, and a bewdiful set shot at the big sticks....AND can pinch hit down back as well - although he's more of a natural forward.
Still only 22yo, and a far less speculative option than your gonna get late in the draft or as a rookie.
Agreed, I guess it depends on if someone decides to be a prick and bids on Lucas.Duffy will be Cat B.
The DFA period is closed.
I’d be pretty shocked if we add more than 4 to the Senior List (all in the ND) then probably 1-2 in the Rookie Draft, leaving 1-2 spots open for SSP.
Yep, that rule went away a few years ago.Bringing it here, not a rumour.
It makes a difference, because if Duffy is Cat A, we do lose a list spot unless we find another Cat B.
The rule about only 1 Irish Cat B seems to be done away with. Although the AFL is absolutely pathetic about announcing such changes, or being clear to the public about the rules. The AFL website said Duffy was Cat B. But again, that could be wrong.
The difference between DFA and SSP is whether they join the Senior List or the Rookie List.
To add to Stam's comment, see:The rookie spot makes no difference as the list size can only be 44 anyway. However, there is/was a rule that you can only have one Irish Rookie B on your list and any others have to be Rookie A. Unless Monahan is Rookie A, this would mean Duffy has to be A. I guess we could have asked for special dispensation.
DFA or SSP, we can sign delisted players regardless.
I doubt that is the case for clubs finishing in finals, let alone top 4 the year before. Our list was weak, as argued 2 years agoAverage across the league for the last decade is 9 changes per club, nothing unusual