Training 2025 Pre-Season

Remove this Banner Ad

I'd be surprised if Soligo didn't finish his career with more individual accolades than Edwards did.
That would likely have more to do with the class of Crows players Edwards had around him career wise than what Soligo is likely to have around him to take the accolades. I don't get why people can't just be happy both play/played for the Crows instead of comparing players from different eras.
 
That would likely have more to do with the class of Crows players Edwards had around him career wise than what Soligo is likely to have around him to take the accolades. I don't get why people can't just be happy both play/played for the Crows instead of comparing players from different eras.
The Des Headland Effect
 
I think our key defenders are better but I think their smalls and their run from defence is better on paper. Bergmann is also looking good down back. The loss of Houston is huge.

Laird won't fix our issues as he doesn't have penatrating kick.

McGuane really has no idea about our team though.

Do they?

The only good runners the only good runners they have are Bergman and Farrell, and farrell spends a lot of time on the wing.

We have Hinge (who is better than Bergman), Michalaney and will one of Cumming or Nankervis on hb.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do they?

The only good runners the only good runners they have are Bergman and Farrell, and farrell spends a lot of time on the wing.

We have Hinge (who is better than Bergman), Michalaney and will one of Cumming or Nankervis on hb.
Geez, Bergman is a bloody good footballer, bit of underrating there.
 
How?
Explain how Bergman is a better player than Hinge?
For starters where did I say Bergman was better?

I said you appear to be underrating Bergman.

They are both decent footballers for their team.
 
For starters where did I say Bergman was better?

I said you appear to be underrating Bergman.

They are both decent footballers for their team.

I made 2 statements about Bergman.

1. Bergman is good.

2. Hinge is better than Bergman

If you I’m underrating him, you must think he’s better than Hinge. Explain how?

Clearly, you did not read my post properly.
 
I made 2 statements about Bergman.

1. Bergman is good.

2. Hinge is better than Bergman

If you I’m underrating him, you must think he’s better than Hinge. Explain how?

Clearly, you did not read my post properly.
You're entitled to that opinion doesn't mean I have to agree, both at their best are good footballers albeit a bit different in the way they play their roles.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He's a better kick, as good a mark and has better footy IQ

Disagree on points 1 and 3.

Bergman long kicking is good but he is very hit and miss with his short kicking.

has a higher Clanger and turnover rate per disposal than Hinge.

Plus Hinge averages 40% more disposals than Bergman.
 
I made 2 statements about Bergman.

1. Bergman is good.

2. Hinge is better than Bergman

If you I’m underrating him, you must think he’s better than Hinge. Explain how?

Clearly, you did not read my post properly.

That logic doesnt hold mate.

1) Bergman is good - lets say 6/10
2) Hinge is better - lets say 8/10

If he believes Bergman is really 7/10 and claims "you're underrating him", it doesnt hold that he "must think he is better than Hinge".

(Numbers for explanation purposes only.)
 
That logic doesnt hold mate.

1) Bergman is good - lets say 6/10
2) Hinge is better - lets say 8/10

If he believes Bergman is really 7/10 and claims "you're underrating him", it doesnt hold that he "must think he is better than Hinge".

(Numbers for explanation purposes only.)
Pretty much.

Hinge is a good player, Bergman is also a good player. There is not a significant difference between the two, they just got about things in a slightly different way.
 
That logic doesnt hold mate.

1) Bergman is good - lets say 6/10
2) Hinge is better - lets say 8/10

If he believes Bergman is really 7/10 and claims "you're underrating him", it doesnt hold that he "must think he is better than Hinge".

(Numbers for explanation purposes only.)

I understand these numbers are an example, but even then they hold no relevance.

The term good is too vague to get a number rating out it. How do you or Mutineer know that I don't consider Bergman a 7?

It is a stretch to say I'm underrating him based on the original post.

Mutineer has to disagree with one of the statements. It seems that he is going to with they're 'as good as each other'.

I think you guys are underrating Hinge.
 
I understand these numbers are an example, but even then they hold no relevance.

The term good is too vague to get a number rating out it. How do you or Mutineer know that I don't consider Bergman a 7?

It is a stretch to say I'm underrating him based on the original post.

Mutineer has to disagree with one of the statements. It seems that he is going to with they're 'as good as each other'.

I think you guys are underrating Hinge.
Nope.

We rate them the same, its not that hard to understand, or at least I didnt think it was.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Training 2025 Pre-Season


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top