Past #24: Levi Greenwood - officially traded to Collingwood FC for pick 25 (2014) - retires rd16 2021 due to concussion symptoms - go well Pig

Remove this Banner Ad

It is ridiculous to claim that this was anything other than about the money. Greenwood chased the money. No way we can deny that.

whether you begrudge him for that is a different story. But he has left to get more money, that is doubtless.

This. he would rather play for the pies FOR more money. What, does everyone think if collingwood offered less than what we did he would still leave

Come on....
 

Log in to remove this ad.

With all due respect to you guys, Levi is not in the same class as Beams. So asking for pick 4 for him is fantasy. I think a trade facilitating JOR might be on the cards if we can persuade Brisbane to send Patffull to Gws.

Also for what it's worth listening to his manager sounds like the Club really dropped the ball on extending his contract. If they had offered him what they are offering him now we would not be having this debate.

Thankyou for sharing your opinion.
 
Im disappointed he wants to go now, but you can hardly blame him. No opportunities for 2 years, and then he finally gets a game. No contract offer until the end of the year. Cant blame him at all, and your comment is misguided!!

It was a joke but please explain to me how it's misguided? Many players leave because of the $$$$
 
Ok serious question:

Levi sits behind Swallow, Cunners, Dal Santo, Wells and JZ .... i think thats clear

Should we have offered our 6th string mid 450k and 4 years?

EFA
 
Fair statement i would have thought.

Lost a great young player, wasted money on Higgins and Waite.

Seriously

Last year we wasted money on Dal Santo we were told. I would be surprised if Waite does not work out l would expect he could kick 40 goals next year. We have added Higgins who has great foot skills one of the real things we lack when kicking inside 50 l think they will both work out.

I do agree we have lost a great young player though, all this crap about he did nothing the last 2 years means nothing as he has a new level.
Levi's improvement meant that JZ & Cunners could go forward.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

****s sake.

Pathetic list management by the Roos.

Huge backward step.
Not sure of a 'huge backward step', but I tend to think we didn't do our best work here and are worse off for it.

Wisdom of hindsight a little bit though, with the early offer etc. Levi's worth graph rose pretty steeply with every match he played and the list management didn't keep up with that situation.
 
How much is the salary cap, 10 million or thereabouts. So people wanted us to pay between 4 to 5 percent of the cap on him.
 
****s sake.

Pathetic list management by the Roos.

Huge backward step.

Wtf? Huge step backwards? How?

This is a guy who has been at our footy club for 7 years, he has had one season where he has played decent/good footy. If he is playing this game for money, good on him piss off to whoever wants to pay him the most.

Like I said, not one player is bigger then our football club. Levi is easily replaced, Dumont now gets his chance. It's not like we are losing a Swallow, Cunnington type, let's not make this bigger then it has to be.
 
I'd rather risk having a Speight/Richardson/Anthony/McMahon situation than risk losing a guy who was arguably our best player this year.

How about risking a no room to move when Cunnington/Ziebell/Swallow/Thomas/Brown/insert player name here need a new contract situation?

Levi had a great season. He was one of our best players across this year, for the first time.

But once Swallow was back to fitness, he was not even our best inside midfielder any more. If Wells had played more than a handful of games, he'd probably be back further.

The more I've thought about it, the more I can see the attraction for him of going to Collingwood to fill Ball's place in the team. More money for less pressure on his spot, and more love. They need him more than North does, so they are paying him more. And we need other current players and other types of players more than we need him, so we are not matching.
 
"I only found out this morning that he was 100% going."

"Collingwood and North need to get a trade done."

North don't need to do anything. I'm sure we would like to but we don't need to do sh*t.
 
How about this for a three way trade:
Brisbane trade picks 5 & 25 - gain Beams
Collingwood trade Beams - gain Greenwood, pick 16 & 25
North trade Greenwood & pick 16 - gain pick 5
I like it. Collingwood getting a bit much for Beams but I would feel we have done well out of losing Greenwood
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Past #24: Levi Greenwood - officially traded to Collingwood FC for pick 25 (2014) - retires rd16 2021 due to concussion symptoms - go well Pig

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top