- May 5, 2016
- 46,267
- 51,807
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Stats can be deceiving . Its the position where your expected to have the highest average. A strike rate of 120 , is 60 runs off 50 balls. Alot of those grounds played on in the PSL, are 200+ wickets and some are 220+ and 240+ wickets. Watched a fair bit of PSL, you do notice a dramatic acceleration in the last 10 overs in those fixtures, probably more so than any other franchise leagues around the world.
I know they are different wickets but its just intent for me.
The game has changed . Ive watched SA V India, West Indies v England and Australia v Pakistan bat over the last week. The contrasts between 4 of those nations, South Africa and Pakistan couldn't be more different. South Africa simply dont have the talent in batting , especially in the Top 3. Pakistan have the talent but the intent isnt there. The other 4 are going from the get-go, they know they have to attack that first 6. And thats where the Power Surge in the BBL is showing in the international game. You have a Power Surge (2 overs), as a batting side, you know you cant waste 12 deliveries. The minimum expectation in a BBL Power surge is around 25+ runs, and teams tend to be clearing 30+ at times.
I actually dont have a problem with Aussies losing 4 wickets or whatever was the other night inside the powerplay, i put a bit more blame on that middle order for not playing the right shots in the middle overs. Gone are the days where you lose 2 to 3 wickets in the Powerplay (first 6 overs) and look to consolidate and get yourself in.
That score above tells you all you need to know.
India 129/1 after 10 the other day v SA. (Yes I know they are different wickets but again look at the intent)
The averages can be deceiving in T20 especially for an opener. Pakistan wickets are high scoring grounds and Dubai/Abu Dhabi (assuming that Pakistan played a fair bit) are high scoring grounds. I can make a bit of an exception for a lower strike rate at Sharjah, having attended that ground in person before, seems like a surface that is generally harder to score on. (I dont have the exact numbers on me)
A closer look at Rizwans numbers:
View attachment 2167939
Ill also say that because Pakistan players dont get to play in the IPL- it hinders a bit their ability by no fault of their own. Rizwan might be compatible on Australian grounds for Test matches and ODI games. He's shown that in Tests multiple times. But he can't bat fast here because his release shots do not get him boundaries here. I also consider a 120 strike rate on overseas flat wickets not comparable to 120 strike rates on Australian wickets . Australian grounds mostly are bigger grounds compared to alot of grounds the world.
After watching Samson, Abhishek, Fraser McGurk, Short, Salt , Jacks, Lewis and Hope bat, the contrasts in method couldnt be more different.
Im reading from some Pakistan fans saying he should be used at 4 in case wickets falls but that record doesnt make for great reading either. Looking at those numbers, I would have gone 'horses for courses'. You dont have power, you dont get picked.
Pakistan play South Africa next and my feeling is those grounds will suit his style as they tend to be better batting wickets for T20 due to a few of those games being at altitude and the records sort of support that.
What has the PSL got to do with his international numbers where he has a strike rate of 140 in Pakistan?
If it’s so easy to average nearly 50, why is Virat Kohli the only player from a tier 1 nation with 1000+ runs with a better average?
Whatever the analysis, there is no circumstance in which you could accuse him of being a shit t20 batsman.