AFL Player # 4: Kyle Langford

Kyle is a...

  • pure mid

  • pure forward

  • mid/forward

  • forward/mid

  • AFL footballer! (and I don't care where he plays)


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Kyle isn't our biggest problem but I would look at letting him drift up the ground more then he does.

Tbh, he has had 1 great year in 10 years.

Yeah, yeah I know out of position etc but I think he needs to be a lot more useful and accountable now. Former top 20 pick...ONE great year and most of this one are his only passes.
Accuracy a big thing for him this year, if he was just a little more accurate he would have pretty much matched last year. Considering how bad our entries are I’d say his last two years have been great overall.

2024
IMG_2882.png

2023
IMG_2881.png
 
Kyle, along with the team, looked pretty good in the first half of the season, basically playing as a smart undersized FF.
Somewhere along the way, he got an injury we never heard about publicity, but I see posters saying it was hip, which makes sense.
He lost his zip and kick. Without that, it doesn't matter how smart he is.
The question I have is, is it an injury that can be overcome?
 
Accuracy a big thing for him this year, if he was just a little more accurate he would have pretty much matched last year. Considering how bad our entries are I’d say his last two years have been great overall.

2024
View attachment 2094404

2023
View attachment 2094405
Would you leave him forward then or let him move up the ground somewhat?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why would they not at least give him a few weeks to rest?

It wouldn't have healed a meniscus tear in that time, but it would give him a few %, and it's not like he played very well in the second half of the year anyway.
 
I don't really like that the club kept playing him knowing he had meniscus tear, even if minor.

No wonder he was turning like a bus and could rarely get any separation off his man.

Bizarre statement. Majority of AFL players would be playing through some form of injury. He wasn’t completely useless out there he just wasn’t his prime self for the second half of the year. Club managed him well to get him through the season from what I can see.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

need some serious consistency from this bloke now that Stringer has moved on.

Was AA Squad worthy 12 months ago bu didn't reach anywhere near the heights in 2024. We need him to contribute 12 - 15 touches, 6 - 10 marks and 1.5 goals a week (or there about cause I know Ethan will say player x was only one to be around that mark) lol
 
need some serious consistency from this bloke now that Stringer has moved on.

Was AA Squad worthy 12 months ago bu didn't reach anywhere near the heights in 2024. We need him to contribute 12 - 15 touches, 6 - 10 marks and 1.5 goals a week (or there about cause I know Ethan will say player x was only one to be around that mark) lol
If he does not have a hip injury again he probably will be okay . He started off well enough.
 
See this bloke being spoken about a bit in the other thread(s), I dont see why he couldn't become our Luke Breust.

LB obviously a fairly intellectual footballer, Langford could do the same imho
 
See this bloke being spoken about a bit in the other thread(s), I dont see why he couldn't become our Luke Breust.

LB obviously a fairly intellectual footballer, Langford could do the same imho

You think the Kyle Langford who ran away from a ball-in-play to the interchange can be an intellectual footballer like Luke Bruest?
 
need some serious consistency from this bloke now that Stringer has moved on.

Was AA Squad worthy 12 months ago bu didn't reach anywhere near the heights in 2024. We need him to contribute 12 - 15 touches, 6 - 10 marks and 1.5 goals a week (or there about cause I know Ethan will say player x was only one to be around that mark) lol
1. Teams worked out he’s our best forward and started to send their #1 defender to him somewhere around the halfway mark of the season.
2. Copped a hip injury that to me eye impacted his kicking for the rest of the season.

I have no concerns re Langford personally.
 
Yep I think that's the issue for Langford. If he's copping the best defender each week he is simply not big/athletic enough to beat them with any kind of consistency. So as long as he is our 'best' forward he is going to struggle.
 
Yep I think that's the issue for Langford. If he's copping the best defender each week he is simply not big/athletic enough to beat them with any kind of consistency. So as long as he is our 'best' forward he is going to struggle.

For a guy to be our highest goal kicker (at 43 - it was even above Stringer!!!!) despite apparently being injured and copping the best defender is a sign of quality.

If he repeats that in 2025 and Caddy, 2MP/Drapper get second or third line defenders, I’ll happily take that.

No injury & hopefully better delivery into F50 - can he break out further? Shouldn’t go backwards???
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player # 4: Kyle Langford

Back
Top